From: "Radim Krčmář" <rkrcmar@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: add KVM_USER_EXIT vcpu ioctl for userspace exit
Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 15:44:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150806134415.GB31952@potion.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55C23B91.4010900@redhat.com>
2015-08-05 18:36+0200, Paolo Bonzini:
> On 05/08/2015 18:33, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> +4.97 KVM_USER_EXIT
>> +
>> +Capability: KVM_CAP_USER_EXIT
>> +Architectures: x86
>> +Type: vcpu ioctl
>> +Parameters: struct kvm_user_exit (in)
>> +Returns: 0 on success,
>> + -EFAULT if the parameter couldn't be read,
>> + -EINVAL if 'reserved' is not zeroed,
>> +
>> +struct kvm_user_exit {
>> + __u8 reserved[32];
>> +};
>
> Can we just return EINVAL if the parameter is not NULL?
It complicates handling if we extend the ioctl, but removes the useless
clearing/copying/checking now ...
The two obvious extensions are flags to skip kvm_make_request() or
kvm_vcpu_kick(), both of dubious use. Another possibility is setting up
conditional exits, but that would be better as a separate control, like
most other sophisticated extensions.
I think that u32 flags would be sufficient -- is casting the 'unsigned
long arg' (data pointer) to a value still an accepted solution?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-06 14:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-05 16:32 [PATCH v2 0/5] KVM: optimize userspace exits with a new ioctl Radim Krčmář
2015-08-05 16:32 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] KVM: add kvm_has_request wrapper Radim Krčmář
2015-08-12 19:57 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-08-13 9:11 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-08-13 9:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-13 10:03 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-08-14 8:42 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-08-05 16:32 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] KVM: add KVM_REQ_EXIT request for userspace exit Radim Krčmář
2015-08-05 16:32 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] KVM: x86: add request_exits debug counter Radim Krčmář
2015-08-05 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] KVM: add KVM_USER_EXIT vcpu ioctl for userspace exit Radim Krčmář
2015-08-05 16:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-06 13:44 ` Radim Krčmář [this message]
2015-08-06 13:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-06 17:21 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-08-16 20:27 ` Avi Kivity
2015-08-17 13:15 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-18 18:30 ` Avi Kivity
2015-08-18 19:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-08-19 6:43 ` Avi Kivity
2015-08-05 16:33 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] KVM: refactor asynchronous vcpu ioctl dispatch Radim Krčmář
2015-08-12 20:03 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-08-13 8:53 ` Radim Krčmář
2015-08-13 9:29 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150806134415.GB31952@potion.brq.redhat.com \
--to=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome