RE: [Xen-devel] [Patch V6 00/16] xen: support pv-domains larger than 512GB

RE: [Xen-devel] [Patch V6 00/16] xen: support pv-domains larger than 512GB

[Boris Ostrovsky]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; boundary="__1438873167431TOUCHDOWN_BOUNDARY__"; charset=utf-8, Size: 973 bytes --]

Queued for nightly.

Note though that I don't have anything even close to 512GB in the test farm.


-----Original Message-----

From: David Vrabel [david.vrabel@citrix.com]
Received: Thursday, 06 Aug 2015, 9:59AM
To: Juergen Gross [jgross@suse.com]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org [linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org]; xen-devel@lists.xensource.com [xen-devel@lists.xensource.com]; konrad.wilk@oracle.com [konrad.wilk@oracle.com]; david.vrabel@citrix.com [david.vrabel@citrix.com]; boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com [boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com]
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch V6 00/16] xen: support pv-domains larger than 512GB

On 17/07/15 05:51, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Support 64 bit pv-domains with more than 512GB of memory.

Applied to for-linus-4.3, thanks.

Boris, can we get a test run with this branch, please?

David
ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥

Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch V6 00/16] xen: support pv-domains larger than 512GB

[David Vrabel]

On 17/07/15 05:51, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Support 64 bit pv-domains with more than 512GB of memory.

Applied to for-linus-4.3, thanks.

Boris, can we get a test run with this branch, please?

David

Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch V6 00/16] xen: support pv-domains larger than 512GB

[David Vrabel]

On 17/07/15 05:51, Juergen Gross wrote:
> Support 64 bit pv-domains with more than 512GB of memory.
> 
> Following test have been done:
> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine
> - 64 bit dom0 on 1TB machine (resolving p2m/E820-map conflict)
> - 32 bit dom0 on 8GB machine
> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine with faked kernel/E820-map conflict
> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine with faked pgtable/E820-map conflict
> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine with faked initrd/E820-map conflict
> - 64 bit dom0 on 8GB machine with faked p2m/E820-map conflict
> - 64 bit domU (sizes up to 900GB)
> - 32 bit domU

Thanks.  #12 needs an MM maintainer ack and it's good to go in I think.

David