* [PATCH tip/core/rcu] Silence lockdep false positive for expedited grace periods
@ 2015-08-10 15:31 Paul E. McKenney
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2015-08-10 15:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Cc: mingo, jiangshanlai, dipankar, akpm, mathieu.desnoyers, josh,
tglx, peterz, rostedt, dhowells, edumazet, dvhart, fweisbec,
oleg, bobby.prani
In a CONFIG_PREEMPT=y kernel, synchronize_rcu_expedited()
acquires the ->exp_funnel_mutex in rcu_preempt_state, then invokes
synchronize_sched_expedited, which acquires the ->exp_funnel_mutex in
rcu_sched_state. There can be no deadlock because rcu_preempt_state
->exp_funnel_mutex acquisition always precedes that of rcu_sched_state.
But lockdep does not know that, so it gives false-positive splats.
This commit therefore associates a separate lock_class_key structure
with the rcu_sched_state structure's ->exp_funnel_mutex, allowing
lockdep to see the lock ordering, avoiding the false positives.
Later changes break the dependency between synchronize_rcu_expedited()
and synchronize_sched_expedited(), after which this commit will be
reverted. However, those later changes are not ready for mainline,
hence this commit.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 3af0dee2d045..439112e9d1b3 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ MODULE_ALIAS("rcutree");
static struct lock_class_key rcu_node_class[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
static struct lock_class_key rcu_fqs_class[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
static struct lock_class_key rcu_exp_class[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
+static struct lock_class_key rcu_exp_sched_class[RCU_NUM_LVLS];
/*
* In order to export the rcu_state name to the tracing tools, it
@@ -4049,6 +4050,7 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp,
static const char * const buf[] = RCU_NODE_NAME_INIT;
static const char * const fqs[] = RCU_FQS_NAME_INIT;
static const char * const exp[] = RCU_EXP_NAME_INIT;
+ static const char * const exp_sched[] = RCU_EXP_SCHED_NAME_INIT;
static u8 fl_mask = 0x1;
int levelcnt[RCU_NUM_LVLS]; /* # nodes in each level. */
@@ -4108,8 +4110,14 @@ static void __init rcu_init_one(struct rcu_state *rsp,
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&rnp->blkd_tasks);
rcu_init_one_nocb(rnp);
mutex_init(&rnp->exp_funnel_mutex);
- lockdep_set_class_and_name(&rnp->exp_funnel_mutex,
- &rcu_exp_class[i], exp[i]);
+ if (rsp == &rcu_sched_state)
+ lockdep_set_class_and_name(
+ &rnp->exp_funnel_mutex,
+ &rcu_exp_sched_class[i], exp_sched[i]);
+ else
+ lockdep_set_class_and_name(
+ &rnp->exp_funnel_mutex,
+ &rcu_exp_class[i], exp[i]);
}
}
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.h b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
index 80d974df0ea0..0412030ca882 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.h
@@ -70,6 +70,8 @@
# define RCU_NODE_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_0" }
# define RCU_FQS_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_fqs_0" }
# define RCU_EXP_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_exp_0" }
+# define RCU_EXP_SCHED_NAME_INIT \
+ { "rcu_node_exp_sched_0" }
#elif NR_CPUS <= RCU_FANOUT_2
# define RCU_NUM_LVLS 2
# define NUM_RCU_LVL_0 1
@@ -79,6 +81,8 @@
# define RCU_NODE_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_0", "rcu_node_1" }
# define RCU_FQS_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_fqs_0", "rcu_node_fqs_1" }
# define RCU_EXP_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_exp_0", "rcu_node_exp_1" }
+# define RCU_EXP_SCHED_NAME_INIT \
+ { "rcu_node_exp_sched_0", "rcu_node_exp_sched_1" }
#elif NR_CPUS <= RCU_FANOUT_3
# define RCU_NUM_LVLS 3
# define NUM_RCU_LVL_0 1
@@ -89,6 +93,8 @@
# define RCU_NODE_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_0", "rcu_node_1", "rcu_node_2" }
# define RCU_FQS_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_fqs_0", "rcu_node_fqs_1", "rcu_node_fqs_2" }
# define RCU_EXP_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_exp_0", "rcu_node_exp_1", "rcu_node_exp_2" }
+# define RCU_EXP_SCHED_NAME_INIT \
+ { "rcu_node_exp_sched_0", "rcu_node_exp_sched_1", "rcu_node_exp_sched_2" }
#elif NR_CPUS <= RCU_FANOUT_4
# define RCU_NUM_LVLS 4
# define NUM_RCU_LVL_0 1
@@ -100,6 +106,8 @@
# define RCU_NODE_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_0", "rcu_node_1", "rcu_node_2", "rcu_node_3" }
# define RCU_FQS_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_fqs_0", "rcu_node_fqs_1", "rcu_node_fqs_2", "rcu_node_fqs_3" }
# define RCU_EXP_NAME_INIT { "rcu_node_exp_0", "rcu_node_exp_1", "rcu_node_exp_2", "rcu_node_exp_3" }
+# define RCU_EXP_SCHED_NAME_INIT \
+ { "rcu_node_exp_sched_0", "rcu_node_exp_sched_1", "rcu_node_exp_sched_2", "rcu_node_exp_sched_3" }
#else
# error "CONFIG_RCU_FANOUT insufficient for NR_CPUS"
#endif /* #if (NR_CPUS) <= RCU_FANOUT_1 */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2015-08-10 15:31 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-10 15:31 [PATCH tip/core/rcu] Silence lockdep false positive for expedited grace periods Paul E. McKenney
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome