From: Huang Shijie <shijie.huang@arm.com>
To: Han Xu <b45815@freescale.com>
Cc: dwmw2@infradead.org, computersforpeace@gmail.com,
boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com, fabio.estevam@freescale.com,
hofrat@osadl.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vinod.koul@intel.com,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/6] mtd: nand: gpmi: may use minimum required ecc for 744 oobsize NAND
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 14:40:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150818064053.GA10641@free64-pc.asiapac.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1439868289-24843-1-git-send-email-b45815@freescale.com>
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 10:24:49PM -0500, Han Xu wrote:
> By default NAND driver will choose the highest ecc strength that oob
> could contain, in this case, for some 8K+744 NAND flash, the ecc
> strength will be up to 52bit, which beyonds the i.MX6QDL BCH capability
> (40bit).
>
> This patch allows the NAND driver try to use minimum required ecc
> strength if it failed to use the highest ecc, even without explicitly
> claiming "fsl,use-minimum-ecc" in dts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Han Xu <b45815@freescale.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c | 24 +++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
> index dfd0ba1..01d24dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/gpmi-nand/gpmi-nand.c
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ static inline bool gpmi_check_ecc(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
> *
> * We may have available oob space in this case.
> */
> -static bool set_geometry_by_ecc_info(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
> +static int set_geometry_by_ecc_info(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
> {
> struct bch_geometry *geo = &this->bch_geometry;
> struct mtd_info *mtd = &this->mtd;
> @@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ static bool set_geometry_by_ecc_info(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
> unsigned int block_mark_bit_offset;
>
> if (!(chip->ecc_strength_ds > 0 && chip->ecc_step_ds > 0))
> - return false;
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> switch (chip->ecc_step_ds) {
> case SZ_512:
> @@ -158,19 +158,19 @@ static bool set_geometry_by_ecc_info(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
> dev_err(this->dev,
> "unsupported nand chip. ecc bits : %d, ecc size : %d\n",
> chip->ecc_strength_ds, chip->ecc_step_ds);
> - return false;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
> geo->ecc_chunk_size = chip->ecc_step_ds;
> geo->ecc_strength = round_up(chip->ecc_strength_ds, 2);
> if (!gpmi_check_ecc(this))
> - return false;
> + return -EINVAL;
>
> /* Keep the C >= O */
> if (geo->ecc_chunk_size < mtd->oobsize) {
> dev_err(this->dev,
> "unsupported nand chip. ecc size: %d, oob size : %d\n",
> chip->ecc_step_ds, mtd->oobsize);
> - return false;
> + return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> /* The default value, see comment in the legacy_set_geometry(). */
> @@ -242,7 +242,7 @@ static bool set_geometry_by_ecc_info(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
> + ALIGN(geo->ecc_chunk_count, 4);
>
> if (!this->swap_block_mark)
> - return true;
> + return 0;
>
> /* For bit swap. */
> block_mark_bit_offset = mtd->writesize * 8 -
> @@ -251,7 +251,7 @@ static bool set_geometry_by_ecc_info(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
>
> geo->block_mark_byte_offset = block_mark_bit_offset / 8;
> geo->block_mark_bit_offset = block_mark_bit_offset % 8;
> - return true;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int legacy_set_geometry(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
> @@ -366,10 +366,12 @@ static int legacy_set_geometry(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
>
> int common_nfc_set_geometry(struct gpmi_nand_data *this)
> {
> - if (of_property_read_bool(this->dev->of_node, "fsl,use-minimum-ecc")
> - && set_geometry_by_ecc_info(this))
> - return 0;
> - return legacy_set_geometry(this);
> +
Please remove the empty line.
> + if ((of_property_read_bool(this->dev->of_node, "fsl,use-minimum-ecc"))
> + || legacy_set_geometry(this))
If the legacy_set_geometry() fails, it will print out an error message.
could you please also change the error log?
thanks
Huang Shijie
> + return set_geometry_by_ecc_info(this);
> +
> + return 0;
> }
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-18 6:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-18 3:24 Han Xu
2015-08-18 6:40 ` Huang Shijie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150818064053.GA10641@free64-pc.asiapac.arm.com \
--to=shijie.huang@arm.com \
--cc=b45815@freescale.com \
--cc=boris.brezillon@free-electrons.com \
--cc=computersforpeace@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=fabio.estevam@freescale.com \
--cc=hofrat@osadl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=vinod.koul@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®