From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [RFC][PATCH 09/11] sched, x86: Kill saved_preempt_count
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 11:28:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150929093520.511427093@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150929092825.540553633@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-kill-preempt_active-9.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2868 bytes --]
With the introduction of the context switch preempt_count invariant,
and the demise of PREEMPT_ACTIVE, its pointless to save/restore the
per-cpu preemption count, it must always be 2.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h | 6 +-----
arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h | 2 --
arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c | 8 --------
arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c | 8 --------
4 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 23 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/preempt.h
@@ -30,13 +30,9 @@ static __always_inline void preempt_coun
/*
* must be macros to avoid header recursion hell
*/
-#define init_task_preempt_count(p) do { \
- task_thread_info(p)->saved_preempt_count = \
- 2*PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET + PREEMPT_NEED_RESCHED; \
-} while (0)
+#define init_task_preempt_count(p) do { } while (0)
#define init_idle_preempt_count(p, cpu) do { \
- task_thread_info(p)->saved_preempt_count = PREEMPT_ENABLED; \
per_cpu(__preempt_count, (cpu)) = PREEMPT_ENABLED; \
} while (0)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/thread_info.h
@@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ struct thread_info {
__u32 flags; /* low level flags */
__u32 status; /* thread synchronous flags */
__u32 cpu; /* current CPU */
- int saved_preempt_count;
mm_segment_t addr_limit;
void __user *sysenter_return;
unsigned int sig_on_uaccess_error:1;
@@ -69,7 +68,6 @@ struct thread_info {
.task = &tsk, \
.flags = 0, \
.cpu = 0, \
- .saved_preempt_count = INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT, \
.addr_limit = KERNEL_DS, \
}
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c
@@ -280,14 +280,6 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p,
set_iopl_mask(next->iopl);
/*
- * If it were not for PREEMPT_ACTIVE we could guarantee that the
- * preempt_count of all tasks was equal here and this would not be
- * needed.
- */
- task_thread_info(prev_p)->saved_preempt_count = this_cpu_read(__preempt_count);
- this_cpu_write(__preempt_count, task_thread_info(next_p)->saved_preempt_count);
-
- /*
* Now maybe handle debug registers and/or IO bitmaps
*/
if (unlikely(task_thread_info(prev_p)->flags & _TIF_WORK_CTXSW_PREV ||
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
@@ -401,14 +401,6 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p,
*/
this_cpu_write(current_task, next_p);
- /*
- * If it were not for PREEMPT_ACTIVE we could guarantee that the
- * preempt_count of all tasks was equal here and this would not be
- * needed.
- */
- task_thread_info(prev_p)->saved_preempt_count = this_cpu_read(__preempt_count);
- this_cpu_write(__preempt_count, task_thread_info(next_p)->saved_preempt_count);
-
/* Reload esp0 and ss1. This changes current_thread_info(). */
load_sp0(tss, next);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-29 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-29 9:28 [RFC][PATCH 00/11] sched: Killing PREEMPT_ACTIVE Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 9:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/11] sched: Simplify INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 10:30 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/core: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 13:19 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/11] sched: " Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-29 14:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-29 14:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
[not found] ` <20150929103729.00899e69@gandalf.local.home>
[not found] ` <20150929143559.GL3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
2015-09-29 15:00 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-29 15:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 9:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/11] sched: Create preempt_count invariant Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 10:30 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/core: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 12:55 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/11] sched: " Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-29 13:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 14:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-29 13:11 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-29 14:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 9:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/11] sched: Robustify preemption leak checks Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 10:31 ` [tip:sched/core] sched/core: " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 13:13 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/11] sched: " Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-29 13:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-29 14:24 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 14:32 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-29 15:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-29 15:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 9:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/11] sched: Rework TASK_DEAD preemption exception Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 13:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-29 13:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-29 15:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-29 9:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/11] sched: Add preempt argument to __schedule() Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 13:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-29 13:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-29 15:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-29 15:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-29 15:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 9:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/11] sched: Fix trace_sched_switch() Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 13:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-29 15:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-29 15:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 16:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-29 9:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/11] sched: Stop setting PREEMPT_ACTIVE Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 13:16 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-29 15:41 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-29 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 9:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/11] sched: Simplify preempt_count tests Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 13:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-29 15:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-29 9:28 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-09-29 13:18 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/11] sched, x86: Kill saved_preempt_count Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-29 15:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-29 15:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 9:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/11] sched: Kill PREEMPT_ACTIVE Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 13:18 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-29 15:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-29 9:28 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/11] sched: More notrace Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 13:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-09-29 15:58 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-29 10:27 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/11] sched: Add preempt_count invariant check Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 10:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 10:56 ` [RFC][PATCH v2 " Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 11:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-09-29 11:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-29 10:34 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/11] sched: Killing PREEMPT_ACTIVE Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150929093520.511427093@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®