From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 04/12] sched: Add preempt argument to __schedule()
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:10:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150930072303.951325024@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150930071035.514587432@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-kill-preempt_active-5.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2087 bytes --]
There is only a single PREEMPT_ACTIVE use in the regular __schedule()
path and that is to circumvent the task->state check. Since the code
setting PREEMPT_ACTIVE is the immediate caller of __schedule() we can
replace this with a function argument.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -3037,7 +3037,7 @@ pick_next_task(struct rq *rq, struct tas
*
* WARNING: must be called with preemption disabled!
*/
-static void __sched __schedule(void)
+static void __sched __schedule(bool preempt)
{
struct task_struct *prev, *next;
unsigned long *switch_count;
@@ -3077,7 +3077,7 @@ static void __sched __schedule(void)
rq->clock_skip_update <<= 1; /* promote REQ to ACT */
switch_count = &prev->nivcsw;
- if (prev->state && !(preempt_count() & PREEMPT_ACTIVE)) {
+ if (!preempt && prev->state) {
if (unlikely(signal_pending_state(prev->state, prev))) {
prev->state = TASK_RUNNING;
} else {
@@ -3142,7 +3142,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __sched schedu
sched_submit_work(tsk);
do {
preempt_disable();
- __schedule();
+ __schedule(false);
sched_preempt_enable_no_resched();
} while (need_resched());
}
@@ -3183,7 +3183,7 @@ static void __sched notrace preempt_sche
{
do {
preempt_active_enter();
- __schedule();
+ __schedule(true);
preempt_active_exit();
/*
@@ -3248,7 +3248,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __sched notrac
* an infinite recursion.
*/
prev_ctx = exception_enter();
- __schedule();
+ __schedule(true);
exception_exit(prev_ctx);
barrier();
@@ -3277,7 +3277,7 @@ asmlinkage __visible void __sched preemp
do {
preempt_active_enter();
local_irq_enable();
- __schedule();
+ __schedule(true);
local_irq_disable();
preempt_active_exit();
} while (need_resched());
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-30 7:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-30 7:10 [PATCH v2 00/12] sched: Killing PREEMPT_ACTIVE Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] sched: Simplify INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 9:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-30 20:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-01 13:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] sched: Rework TASK_DEAD preemption exception Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] sched: Create preempt_count invariant Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 9:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-30 11:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 13:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-30 7:10 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] sched: Fix trace_sched_switch() Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] sched: Stop setting PREEMPT_ACTIVE Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01 15:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] sched: Robustify preemption leak checks Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 9:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] sched: Simplify preempt_count tests Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01 15:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] sched, x86: Kill saved_preempt_count Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01 15:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] sched: Kill PREEMPT_ACTIVE Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01 15:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] sched: More notrace Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] sched: Add preempt_count invariant check Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 9:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-30 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150930072303.951325024@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®