From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, rostedt@goodmis.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/12] sched: Robustify preemption leak checks
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 09:10:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150930072304.285433585@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150930071035.514587432@infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1: peterz-kill-preempt_active-3.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1564 bytes --]
When we warn about a preempt_count leak; reset the preempt_count to
the known good value such that the problem does not ripple forward.
This is most important on x86 which has a per cpu preempt_count that is
not saved/restored (after this series). So if you schedule with an
invalid (!2*PREEMPT_DISABLE_OFFSET) preempt_count the next task is
messed up too.
Enforcing this invariant limits the borkage to just the one task.
Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
kernel/exit.c | 4 +++-
kernel/sched/core.c | 4 +++-
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -706,10 +706,12 @@ void do_exit(long code)
smp_mb();
raw_spin_unlock_wait(&tsk->pi_lock);
- if (unlikely(in_atomic()))
+ if (unlikely(in_atomic())) {
pr_info("note: %s[%d] exited with preempt_count %d\n",
current->comm, task_pid_nr(current),
preempt_count());
+ preempt_count_set(PREEMPT_ENABLED);
+ }
/* sync mm's RSS info before statistics gathering */
if (tsk->mm)
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2968,8 +2968,10 @@ static inline void schedule_debug(struct
BUG_ON(unlikely(task_stack_end_corrupted(prev)));
#endif
- if (unlikely(in_atomic_preempt_off()))
+ if (unlikely(in_atomic_preempt_off())) {
__schedule_bug(prev);
+ preempt_count_set(PREEMPT_DISABLED);
+ }
rcu_sleep_check();
profile_hit(SCHED_PROFILING, __builtin_return_address(0));
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-30 7:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-30 7:10 [PATCH v2 00/12] sched: Killing PREEMPT_ACTIVE Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 01/12] sched: Simplify INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 9:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-30 20:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-10-01 13:25 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 02/12] sched: Rework TASK_DEAD preemption exception Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 03/12] sched: Create preempt_count invariant Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 9:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-30 11:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 13:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 04/12] sched: Add preempt argument to __schedule() Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 05/12] sched: Fix trace_sched_switch() Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 06/12] sched: Stop setting PREEMPT_ACTIVE Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01 15:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-30 7:10 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-09-30 9:35 ` [PATCH v2 07/12] sched: Robustify preemption leak checks Steven Rostedt
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 08/12] sched: Simplify preempt_count tests Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01 15:31 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 09/12] sched, x86: Kill saved_preempt_count Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01 15:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 10/12] sched: Kill PREEMPT_ACTIVE Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-01 15:41 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 11/12] sched: More notrace Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 7:10 ` [PATCH v2 12/12] sched: Add preempt_count invariant check Peter Zijlstra
2015-09-30 9:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-09-30 11:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150930072304.285433585@infradead.org \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®