From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Start stopper early
Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2015 20:47:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151008184743.GA829@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151008180557.GA28123@redhat.com>
On 10/08, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> To avoid the confusion, let me repeat that I am not arguing with
> this change, perhaps it makes sense too.
>
> But unless I missed something it is not really correct and can't
> fix the problem. So I still think the series I sent should be
> applied first.
...
> But note that kthread_unpark() will only wake the stopper thread up.
>
> cpu_stopper->enabled is still false, and it will be false until
> smpboot_unpark_thread() calls ->pre_unpark() later. And this means
> that stop_two_cpus()->cpu_stop_queue_work() can silently fail until
> then. So I don't this patch can fix the problem.
So I'd suggest something like the patch below (uncompiled/untested)
on top of the series I sent.
Note also that (at least imo) it looks like a cleanup, and even
->selfparking becomes more consistent.
What do you think?
Oleg.
--- a/include/linux/smpboot.h
+++ b/include/linux/smpboot.h
@@ -40,7 +40,6 @@ struct smp_hotplug_thread {
void (*cleanup)(unsigned int cpu, bool online);
void (*park)(unsigned int cpu);
void (*unpark)(unsigned int cpu);
- void (*pre_unpark)(unsigned int cpu);
bool selfparking;
const char *thread_comm;
};
diff --git a/include/linux/stop_machine.h b/include/linux/stop_machine.h
index 7b76362..0adedca 100644
--- a/include/linux/stop_machine.h
+++ b/include/linux/stop_machine.h
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@ void stop_one_cpu_nowait(unsigned int cpu, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg,
int stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg);
int try_stop_cpus(const struct cpumask *cpumask, cpu_stop_fn_t fn, void *arg);
void stop_machine_park(int cpu);
+void stop_machine_unpark(int cpu);
#else /* CONFIG_SMP */
--- a/kernel/smpboot.c
+++ b/kernel/smpboot.c
@@ -221,9 +221,8 @@ static void smpboot_unpark_thread(struct smp_hotplug_thread *ht, unsigned int cp
{
struct task_struct *tsk = *per_cpu_ptr(ht->store, cpu);
- if (ht->pre_unpark)
- ht->pre_unpark(cpu);
- kthread_unpark(tsk);
+ if (!ht->selfparking)
+ kthread_unpark(tsk);
}
void smpboot_unpark_threads(unsigned int cpu)
--- a/kernel/stop_machine.c
+++ b/kernel/stop_machine.c
@@ -513,6 +513,14 @@ static void cpu_stop_unpark(unsigned int cpu)
spin_unlock_irq(&stopper->lock);
}
+void stop_machine_unpark(int cpu)
+{
+ struct cpu_stopper *stopper = &per_cpu(cpu_stopper, cpu);
+
+ cpu_stop_unpark(cpu);
+ kthread_unpark(stopper->thread);
+}
+
static struct smp_hotplug_thread cpu_stop_threads = {
.store = &cpu_stopper.thread,
.thread_should_run = cpu_stop_should_run,
@@ -521,7 +529,6 @@ static struct smp_hotplug_thread cpu_stop_threads = {
.create = cpu_stop_create,
.setup = cpu_stop_unpark,
.park = cpu_stop_park,
- .pre_unpark = cpu_stop_unpark,
.selfparking = true,
};
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5515,11 +5515,14 @@ static void set_cpu_rq_start_time(void)
static int sched_cpu_active(struct notifier_block *nfb,
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
{
+ int cpu = (long)hcpu;
+
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_STARTING:
set_cpu_rq_start_time();
return NOTIFY_OK;
case CPU_ONLINE:
+ stop_machine_unpark(cpu);
/*
* At this point a starting CPU has marked itself as online via
* set_cpu_online(). But it might not yet have marked itself
@@ -5528,7 +5531,7 @@ static int sched_cpu_active(struct notif
* Thus, fall-through and help the starting CPU along.
*/
case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
- set_cpu_active((long)hcpu, true);
+ set_cpu_active(cpu, true);
return NOTIFY_OK;
default:
return NOTIFY_DONE;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-08 18:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-07 8:41 Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 12:30 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-07 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-07 13:20 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-07 13:24 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-07 13:36 ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-08 14:50 ` [PATCH 0/3] (Was: [RFC][PATCH] sched: Start stopper early) Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-08 14:51 ` [PATCH 1/3] stop_machine: ensure that a queued callback will be called before cpu_stop_park() Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-14 15:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-14 19:03 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-14 20:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-15 17:02 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-16 10:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-20 9:32 ` [tip:sched/core] stop_machine: Ensure " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-08 14:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] stop_machine: introduce __cpu_stop_queue_work() and cpu_stop_queue_two_works() Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-20 9:33 ` [tip:sched/core] stop_machine: Introduce " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-08 14:51 ` [PATCH 3/3] stop_machine: change cpu_stop_queue_two_works() to rely on stopper->enabled Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-08 15:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-08 15:59 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-08 16:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-08 17:01 ` [PATCH v2 " Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-09 16:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-09 16:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-20 9:33 ` [tip:sched/core] stop_machine: Change " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-08 18:05 ` [RFC][PATCH] sched: Start stopper early Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-08 18:47 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-10-09 16:00 ` [PATCH 0/3] make stopper threads more "selfparking" Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-09 16:00 ` [PATCH 1/3] stop_machine: kill smp_hotplug_thread->pre_unpark, introduce stop_machine_unpark() Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-20 9:33 ` [tip:sched/core] stop_machine: Kill smp_hotplug_thread-> pre_unpark, " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-09 16:00 ` [PATCH 2/3] stop_machine: kill cpu_stop_threads->setup() and cpu_stop_unpark() Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-20 9:34 ` [tip:sched/core] stop_machine: Kill " tip-bot for Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-09 16:00 ` [PATCH 3/3] sched: start stopper early Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-09 16:49 ` Oleg Nesterov
2015-10-20 9:34 ` [tip:sched/core] sched: Start " tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-16 8:22 ` [RFC][PATCH] " Heiko Carstens
2015-10-16 9:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-16 12:01 ` Heiko Carstens
2015-10-26 14:24 ` Michael Holzheu
2015-10-26 20:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151008184743.GA829@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome