mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
Cc: paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] sched: disable task group re-weighting on the desktop
Date: Sat, 10 Oct 2015 19:13:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151010171351.GN11639@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151010170142.GI3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 07:01:42PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 03:22:49PM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> > Ah, but now onward to interactivity...
> >
> > master, 8 groups of 1 (pert) vs desktop (mplayer BigBuckBunny-DivXPlusHD.mkv)
> >   PID USER      PR  NI    VIRT    RES    SHR S  %CPU  %MEM     TIME+ P COMMAND
> >  4068 root      20   0    8312    724    628 R 99.64 0.004   1:04.32 6 pert
> >  4065 root      20   0    8312    744    648 R 99.45 0.005   1:04.92 5 pert
> >  4071 root      20   0    8312    748    652 R 99.27 0.005   1:03.12 7 pert
> >  4077 root      20   0    8312    840    744 R 98.72 0.005   1:01.46 3 pert
> >  4074 root      20   0    8312    796    700 R 98.18 0.005   1:03.38 1 pert
> >  4079 root      20   0    8312    720    624 R 97.99 0.004   1:01.45 4 pert
> >  4062 root      20   0    8312    836    740 R 96.72 0.005   1:03.44 0 pert
> >  4059 root      20   0    8312    720    624 R 94.16 0.004   1:04.92 2 pert
> >  4082 root      20   0 1094400 154324  33592 S 4.197 0.954   0:02.69 0 mplayer
> >  1029 root      20   0  465332 151540  40816 R 3.285 0.937   0:24.59 2 Xorg
> >  1773 root      20   0  662592  73308  42012 S 2.007 0.453   0:12.84 5 konsole
> >   771 root      20   0   11416   1964   1824 S 0.730 0.012   0:10.45 0 rngd
> >  1722 root      20   0 2866772  65224  51152 S 0.365 0.403   0:03.44 2 kwin
> >  1769 root      20   0  711684  54212  38020 S 0.182 0.335   0:00.39 1 kmix

Ah wait, so you have 8 groups of cycle soakers vs 1 group of desktop?
That means your desktop will get 1/9 th of the total time and that is
almost so:

 2.69+24.59+12.84+10.45+3.44+.39 = 54.4

vs

 (64.32+64.92+63.12+61.46+63.38+61.45+63.44+64.92)/8 = 63.37625

Which isn't too far off.

This really appears to be a case where you get what you ask for.


  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-10 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-05 21:48 CFS scheduler unfairly prefers pinned tasks paul.szabo
2015-10-06  2:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-06 10:06   ` paul.szabo
2015-10-06 12:17     ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-06 20:44       ` paul.szabo
2015-10-07  1:28         ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-08  8:19   ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-08 10:54     ` paul.szabo
2015-10-08 11:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-10 13:22         ` [patch] sched: disable task group re-weighting on the desktop Mike Galbraith
2015-10-10 14:03           ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-10 14:41             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-10 17:01           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-10 17:13             ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-10-11  2:25             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-11 17:42               ` 4.3 group scheduling regression Mike Galbraith
2015-10-12  7:23                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-12  7:44                   ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-12  8:04                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-12  0:53                       ` Yuyang Du
2015-10-12  9:12                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-12  2:12                           ` Yuyang Du
2015-10-12 10:23                             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-12 19:55                               ` Yuyang Du
2015-10-13  4:08                                 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-12 20:42                                   ` Yuyang Du
2015-10-13  8:06                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-13  0:35                                   ` Yuyang Du
2015-10-13  8:10                                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-13  0:37                                     ` Yuyang Du
2015-10-12 11:47                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-12 19:32                               ` Yuyang Du
2015-10-13  8:07                                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-10-13  2:22                               ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-12  8:48                       ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-10 20:14           ` [patch] sched: disable task group re-weighting on the desktop paul.szabo
2015-10-11  2:38             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-11  9:25               ` paul.szabo
2015-10-11 12:49                 ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-11 19:46           ` paul.szabo
2015-10-12  1:59             ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-08 14:25       ` CFS scheduler unfairly prefers pinned tasks Mike Galbraith
2015-10-08 21:55         ` paul.szabo
2015-10-09  1:56           ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-09  2:40           ` Mike Galbraith
2015-10-11  9:43             ` paul.szabo
2015-10-10  3:59     ` Wanpeng Li
2015-10-10  7:58       ` Wanpeng Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151010171351.GN11639@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul.szabo@sydney.edu.au \
    --cc=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome