From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, yinghai@kernel.org, dyoung@redhat.com,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com, bp@suse.de,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jerry_hoemann@hp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Do not reserve crashkernel high memory if crashkernel low memory reserving failed
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 10:43:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151014084328.GU10641@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443065091-28198-1-git-send-email-bhe@redhat.com>
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:24:51AM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> People reported that when allocating crashkernel memory using
> ",high" and ",low" syntax, there were cases where the reservation
> of the "high" portion succeeds, but the reservation of the "low"
> portion fails. Then kexec can load kdump kernel successfully, but
> the boot of kdump kernel fails as there's no low memory. This is
> because allocation of low memory for kdump kernel can fail on large
> systems for reasons. E.g it could be manually specified crashkernel
> low memory is too large to find in memblock region.
>
> In this patch add return value for reserve_crashkernel_low. Then
> try to reserve crashkernel low memory after crashkernel high memory
> has been allocated. If crashkernel low memory reservation failed
> free crashkernel high memory and return. User can take measures
> when they found kdump kernel cann't be loaded successfully.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
> ---
> v1->v2:
> Boris commented that error value EINVAL is negative, should
> use "return -EINVAL".
>
> v2->v3:
> Yinghai pointed out that during memblock_reserve, we could double
> the memblock reserve array. New memblock reserve could be overlapped
> with range for crashkernel high. So we have to reserve crashkernel
> high firstly, then free it if crashkernel low memory allocation
> failed.
>
> v3->v4:
> Dave suggested using "return -ENOMEM" when low memory reservation
> failed and printing failure message anyway.
>
> v4->v5:
> Andrew suggested changing the content of failure message and taking
> higher severity KERN_ERR.
>
> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 20 +++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
The patch is also in SLES for some time now and was successfully tested
there.
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-10-14 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-24 3:24 Baoquan He
2015-10-14 6:16 ` Baoquan He
2015-10-14 8:43 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2015-10-14 10:43 ` Borislav Petkov
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-07-19 11:07 Baoquan He
2015-07-19 13:40 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-19 14:23 ` Baoquan He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151014084328.GU10641@suse.de \
--to=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jerry_hoemann@hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yinghai@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®