mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@freescale.com>
Cc: nico@linaro.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: SWP emulation: Restore original *data when failed
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 09:57:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151015085700.GY32532@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151015083629.GA32630@shlinux2>

On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 04:36:31PM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 09:24:17AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 10:51:17AM +0800, Shengjiu Wang wrote:
> > > __user_swpX_asm maybe failed in first STREX operation, emulate_swpX
> > > will try again, but the *data has been changed in first time. which
> > > cause the result is wrong. So need to recover the *data when failed.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@freescale.com>
> > > ---
> > >  arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c b/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
> > > index 5b26e7e..c61fbf92 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/swp_emulate.c
> > > @@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
> > >  	"1:	strex"B"	%0, %2, [%3]\n"			\
> > >  	"	cmp		%0, #0\n"			\
> > >  	"	movne		%0, %4\n"			\
> > > +	"	movne		%1, %2\n"			\
> > >  	"2:\n"							\
> > >  	"	.section	 .text.fixup,\"ax\"\n"		\
> > >  	"	.align		2\n"				\
> > 
> > I think I'd prefer this to be:
> > 
> > 	__asm__ __volatile__(					\
> > 	"0:	ldrex"B"	%2, [%3]\n"			\
> > 	"1:	strex"B"	%0, %1, [%3]\n" 		\
> > 	"	cmp		%0, #0\n"			\
> > 	"	moveq		%1, %2\n"			\
> > 	"	movne		%0, %4\n"			\
> > 
> > so that we're not loading into %1 (an in-out non-temporary) but rather
> > loading it into a temporary - and only overwriting the saved register
> > value if the swap succeeds.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> 
> I am ok with your change. Need I send another patch for this change? or will
> you send it by yourself?

Please send a new patch, thanks.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.

  reply	other threads:[~2015-10-15  8:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-14  2:51 Shengjiu Wang
2015-10-15  8:24 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-10-15  8:36   ` Shengjiu Wang
2015-10-15  8:57     ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2015-10-15  9:17       ` Vladimir Murzin
2015-10-15 13:02         ` Will Deacon
2015-10-15 13:25           ` Vladimir Murzin
2015-10-16  7:52             ` Vladimir Murzin
2015-10-16 10:37               ` Catalin Marinas
2015-10-27 15:44                 ` Will Deacon
2015-10-28 16:16                   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151015085700.GY32532@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nico@linaro.org \
    --cc=shengjiu.wang@freescale.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®