mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-efi@vger.kernel.org,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Sai Praneeth Prakhya <sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
	Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] Documentation/x86: Update EFI memory region description
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 09:18:59 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151118081859.GB23844@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151113092906.GD2716@codeblueprint.co.uk>


* Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Nov, at 10:22:10AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > 
> > * Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > > +We map EFI runtime services in the efi_pgd PGD in the virtual range of
> > > +64Gb (arbitrarily set, can be raised if needed). The mappings are not
> > > +part of any other kernel PGD and are only available during EFI runtime
> > > +calls.
> > 
> > Is that virtual address range 0-64Gb, i.e.:
> > 
> > 	0x00000000.00000000 - 0x00000010.00000000
> > 
> > or is it somewhere else?
> 
> You've snipped the patch hunk that gives the address range used,
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt
> b/Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt
> index 05712ac83e38..a9885bb1ac22 100644
> --- a/Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/x86/x86_64/mm.txt
> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@ ffffec0000000000 - fffffc0000000000 (=44 bits) kasan
> shadow memory (16TB)
>  ... unused hole ...
>  ffffff0000000000 - ffffff7fffffffff (=39 bits) %esp fixup stacks
>  ... unused hole ...
> +ffffffef00000000 - ffffffff00000000 (=64 GB) EFI region mapping space
> +... unused hole ...
>  ffffffff80000000 - ffffffffa0000000 (=512 MB)  kernel text mapping,
> from phys 0
>  ffffffffa0000000 - ffffffffff5fffff (=1525 MB) module mapping space
>  ffffffffff600000 - ffffffffffdfffff (=8 MB) vsyscalls

Ah yes - but then the text is misleading, what does 'in the virtual range of 64Gb' 
mean? A virtual memory range is a specific range of addresses - like in the table 
you extended.

A better phrasing would be something like:

 We map EFI runtime services in the 'efi_pgd' PGD in a 64Gb large virtual memory
 window (this size is arbitrary, it can be raised later if needed).

Agreed?

Thanks,

	Ingo

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-18  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-12 15:40 [GIT PULL 0/6] EFI page table isolation Matt Fleming
2015-11-12 15:40 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/mm/pageattr: Ensure cpa->pfn only contains page frame numbers Matt Fleming
2015-11-12 18:47   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-12 15:40 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/mm/pageattr: Do not strip pte flags from cpa->pfn Matt Fleming
2015-11-12 18:47   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-12 19:28     ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-12 15:40 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/efi: Map RAM into the identity page table for mixed mode Matt Fleming
2015-11-12 18:01   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-12 19:45     ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-12 15:40 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86/efi: Hoist page table switching code into efi_call_virt() Matt Fleming
2015-11-12 18:44   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-12 20:01     ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-13  7:59       ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-13 16:19         ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-12 18:47   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-12 20:15     ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-12 15:40 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86/efi: Build our own page table structures Matt Fleming
2015-11-12 18:38   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-12 21:38     ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-12 15:40 ` [PATCH 6/6] Documentation/x86: Update EFI memory region description Matt Fleming
2015-11-12 18:37   ` Borislav Petkov
2015-11-13  9:22   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-13  9:29     ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-13 16:42       ` Linus Torvalds
2015-11-13 22:22         ` Matt Fleming
2015-11-18  8:18       ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-11-19 11:22         ` Matt Fleming

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151118081859.GB23844@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=davej@codemonkey.org.uk \
    --cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=sai.praneeth.prakhya@intel.com \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome