From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pi3orama <pi3orama@163.com>,
lizefan 00213767 <lizefan@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 2015 12:23:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151119112315.GL3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151119102300.GA2830@gmail.com>
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:23:00AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> PEBS is an asynchronous hardware tracing mechanism, when batched PEBS is used it
> might not even result in any interruption of execution. The 'pt_regs' does not
> necessarily correspond to an interrupted, restartable context - we take the RIP
> from the PEBS machinery and also use LBR and disassembly to determine the previous
> instruction, before reporting it to user-space.
Note that modern PEBS hardware (hsw+) does the rollback in hardware.
Prior to that we indeed to it manually using the LBR.
As to pt_regs, we construct a franken pt_regs based on the actual PEBS
buffer overflow PMI and bits from the PEBS record (which also includes
some register state). See
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_ds.c:setup_pebs_sample_data().
We always copy the flags, ip, bp and sp from the PEBS record into the
interrupt pt_regs.
And note that the PEBS record is constructed at instruction retirement,
so it shows the state _after_ the instruction, with exception of the
(hsw+) real_ip field.
So the unwinder will have to be taught that if the IP points at a stack
altering instruction (call, push, etc.) it will have to 'undo' the
effects on the actual stack (I appreciate this might be 'interesting'
for things like: pop, ret, etc.).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-19 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-18 7:20 Wangnan (F)
2015-11-18 8:00 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-18 8:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-18 8:42 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-18 8:49 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-19 6:37 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-19 6:45 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-19 10:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-19 10:43 ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-19 11:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-19 11:23 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-11-27 8:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-30 9:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-01 7:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-01 8:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-01 16:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-01 17:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-02 9:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-18 8:48 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-11-18 9:02 ` Wangnan (F)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151119112315.GL3816@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pi3orama@163.com \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome