mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wangnan (F)" <wangnan0@huawei.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, pi3orama <pi3orama@163.com>,
	"lizefan 00213767" <lizefan@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [BUG REPORT] perf tools: x86_64: Broken calllchain when sampling taken at 'callq' instruction
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2015 16:00:17 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <564C3011.8090002@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <564C26C4.2040603@huawei.com>



On 2015/11/18 15:20, Wangnan (F) wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> When analysising Jiri's patchset [1] I found a dwarf unwind problem.
> On x86 platform, when sample is at a 'callq' instruction, dwarf based
> stack unwind always fail.
>
> I compile a small C source file with debug information, turn off
> frame pointer and disable optimization:
>
> $ gcc -g -O0 -fomit-frame-pointer ./test_dwarf_unwind.c -o 
> ./test_dwarf_unwind

For whom want to test it: here is the test code I used.

#include <stdio.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sys/time.h>

static volatile int x = 0;

int funcc(void)
{
     struct timeval tv1, tv2;
     unsigned long us1, us2;

     gettimeofday(&tv1, NULL);

     us1 = tv1.tv_sec * 1000000 + tv1.tv_usec;

     while(1) {
         x = x + 100;
         gettimeofday(&tv2, NULL);
         us2 = tv2.tv_sec * 1000000 + tv2.tv_usec;
         if (us2 - us1 >= 3000000)
             break;
     }
     return x;
}
int funcb(void) { return funcc();}
int funca(void) { return funcb();}
int main() { funca(); return 0;}




  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-18  8:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-18  7:20 Wangnan (F)
2015-11-18  8:00 ` Wangnan (F) [this message]
2015-11-18  8:20   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-18  8:42     ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-18  8:49       ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-19  6:37         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-19  6:45           ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-19 10:23             ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-19 10:43               ` Wangnan (F)
2015-11-19 11:28                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-19 11:23               ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-11-27  8:38                 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-30  9:28                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-01  7:28                     ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-01  8:38                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-01 16:11                         ` Ingo Molnar
2015-12-01 17:21                           ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-02  9:55                             ` Ingo Molnar
2015-11-18  8:48 ` Jiri Olsa
2015-11-18  9:02   ` Wangnan (F)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=564C3011.8090002@huawei.com \
    --to=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pi3orama@163.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome