From: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>, Dave Jones <dsj@fb.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jon Christopherson <jon@jons.org>
Subject: [PATCH] lock_page() doesn't lock if __wait_on_bit_lock returns -EINTR
Date: Sat, 12 Dec 2015 11:23:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151212162342.GF11257@ret.masoncoding.com> (raw)
We have two reports of frequent crashes in btrfs where asserts in
clear_page_dirty_for_io() were triggering on missing page locks.
The crashes were much easier to trigger when processes were catching
ctrl-c's, and after much debugging it really looked like lock_page was a
noop.
This recent commit looks pretty suspect to me, and I confirmed that we
were exiting __wait_on_bit_lock() with -EINTR when it was called with
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE
commit 68985633bccb6066bf1803e316fbc6c1f5b796d6
Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date: Tue Dec 1 14:04:04 2015 +0100
sched/wait: Fix signal handling in bit wait helpers
The patch below is mostly untested, and probably not the right solution.
Dave's trinity run doesn't explode immediately anymore, and I wanted to
get this out for discussion. A quick look on the list doesn't show
anyone else has tracked this down, sorry if it's a dup.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <dsj@fb.com>,
Reported-by: Jon Christopherson <jon@jons.org>
Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
diff --git a/kernel/sched/wait.c b/kernel/sched/wait.c
index f10bd87..12f69df 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/wait.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/wait.c
@@ -434,6 +434,8 @@ __wait_on_bit_lock(wait_queue_head_t *wq, struct wait_bit_queue *q,
ret = action(&q->key);
if (!ret)
continue;
+ if (ret == -EINTR && mode == TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE)
+ continue;
abort_exclusive_wait(wq, &q->wait, mode, &q->key);
return ret;
} while (test_and_set_bit(q->key.bit_nr, q->key.flags));
next reply other threads:[~2015-12-12 16:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-12 16:23 Chris Mason [this message]
2015-12-12 18:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-12-12 19:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-12-13 0:07 ` Chris Mason
2015-12-14 18:33 ` Dave Jones
2015-12-14 20:01 ` Chris Mason
2015-12-14 23:59 ` Chris Mason
2015-12-13 9:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-12-13 15:55 ` Chris Mason
2015-12-13 20:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-12-13 21:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151212162342.GF11257@ret.masoncoding.com \
--to=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsj@fb.com \
--cc=jon@jons.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome