mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Liviu Dudau <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>,
	linux-rockchip <linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org>,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	LAKML <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Improve drm_of_component_probe() and move rockchip to use it
Date: Fri, 25 Dec 2015 10:38:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151225103817.3aa1d89433607ee7fbf5181f@free.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151224123610.GE8644@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>

On Thu, 24 Dec 2015 12:36:10 +0000
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:

> It seems that you're trying to work around a limitation in Linux by
> modifying the hardware representation...

Sorry to come back to this topic, but I think you are wrong.

Looking at the imx6 DTs, the problem comes from the display-subsystem
node which is a pure Linux specific software entity.

If you want to describe only the hardware in the DT, everything is
simple.

A IPU is a image controller with its sub-devices. Seen from the system, it
is like a 'board' with its devices (LCDs, camera...).

When 2 IPUs, there are 2 independant boards.

Here is what could be a pure hardware DT:

/* no display-subsystem */

	ipu1: ipu@02400000 {		/* image controller / board 1 */
		compatible = "fsl,imx6q-ipu";
		...
		ports = <&ipu1_di0>, <&ipu1_di1>;
	};
	ipu1_di0: di@0 {		/* display interface / crtc 1 */
		compatible = "fsl,imx6q-di";
		...
		ipu1_di0_hdmi: endpoint@1 {
			remote-endpoint = <&hdmi_mux_0>;
		};
		ipu1_di0_mipi: endpoint@2 {
			remote-endpoint = <&mipi_mux_0>;
		}
		...
	};
	ipu1_di1: di@1 {		/* display interface / crtc 2 */
		compatible = "fsl,imx6q-di";
		...
		ipu1_di1_hdmi: endpoint@1 {
			remote-endpoint = <&hdmi_mux_1>;
		};
		ipu1_di1_mipi: endpoint@2 {
			remote-endpoint = <&mipi_mux_1>;
		}
		...
	};

	ipu2: ipu@02800000 {		/* image controller / board 2 */
		compatible = "fsl,imx6q-ipu";
		...
		ports = <&ipu2_di0>, <&ipu2_di1>;
	};
	ipu2_di0: di@0 {		/* display interface / crtc 1 */
		compatible = "fsl,imx6q-di";
		...
		ipu2_di0_hdmi: endpoint@1 {
			remote-endpoint = <&hdmi_mux_2>;
		};
		ipu2_di0_mipi: endpoint@2 {
			remote-endpoint = <&mipi_mux_2>;
		}
		...
	};
	ipu2_di1: di@1 {		/* display interface / crtc 2 */
		compatible = "fsl,imx6q-di";
		...
		ipu2_di1_hdmi: endpoint@1 {
			remote-endpoint = <&hdmi_mux_3>;
		};
		ipu2_di1_mipi: endpoint@2 {
			remote-endpoint = <&mipi_mux_3>;
		}
		...
	};

Then, a standard component binding (port->parent) works fine...

(you may note that the same problem exists with audio: the
'simple-card' is also a pure Linux specific software entity)

-- 
Merry Christmas	|	      ** Breizh ha Linux atav! **
Jef		|		http://moinejf.free.fr/

      reply	other threads:[~2015-12-25  9:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-20 14:22 Liviu Dudau
2015-11-20 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] drm: Improve drm_of_component_probe() to correctly handle ports and remote ports Liviu Dudau
2016-02-22 11:51   ` Liviu Dudau
2016-02-22 15:51     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2016-02-22 15:57       ` Liviu Dudau
2015-11-20 14:22 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] drm/rockchip: Convert the probe function to the generic drm_of_component_probe() Liviu Dudau
2015-11-23  9:39   ` Mark yao
2015-11-23 23:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Improve drm_of_component_probe() and move rockchip to use it Heiko Stübner
2015-12-12 13:29 ` Heiko Stübner
2015-12-22 17:38 ` Liviu Dudau
2015-12-23  1:33   ` Dave Airlie
2015-12-23  9:39   ` Jean-Francois Moine
2015-12-23 10:05     ` Liviu Dudau
2015-12-23 17:20       ` Jean-Francois Moine
2015-12-23 18:59         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-24  8:15           ` Jean-Francois Moine
2015-12-24 10:52             ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-24 12:27               ` Jean-Francois Moine
2015-12-24 12:36                 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-12-25  9:38                   ` Jean-Francois Moine [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151225103817.3aa1d89433607ee7fbf5181f@free.fr \
    --to=moinejf@free.fr \
    --cc=Liviu.Dudau@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®