mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: cmetcalf@ezchip.com, will.deacon@arm.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, luto@amacapital.net,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] arm64: entry: remove pointless SPSR mode check
Date: Wed, 6 Jan 2016 12:15:25 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160106121524.GL6301@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452015215-29506-1-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 05:33:34PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> In work_pending  we may skip work if the stacked SPSR value represents
> anything other than an EL0 context. We then immediately invoke the
> kernel_exit 0 macro as part of ret_to_user, assuming a return to EL0.
> This is somewhat confusing.
> 
> We use work_pending as part of the ret_to_user/ret_fast_syscall state
> machine. We only use ret_fast_syscall in the return from an SVC issued
> from EL0. We use ret_to_user for return from EL0 exception handlers and
> also for return from ret_from_fork in the case the task was not a kernel
> thread (i.e. it is a user task).
> 
> Thus in all cases the stacked SPSR value must represent an EL0 context,
> and the check is redundant. This patch removes it, along with the now
> unused no_work_pending label.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@ezchip.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>

Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-06 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-04 19:34 [PATCH v9 00/13] support "task_isolation" mode for nohz_full Chris Metcalf
2016-01-04 19:34 ` [PATCH v9 01/13] vmstat: provide a function to quiet down the diff processing Chris Metcalf
2016-01-04 19:34 ` [PATCH v9 02/13] vmstat: add vmstat_idle function Chris Metcalf
2016-01-04 19:34 ` [PATCH v9 03/13] lru_add_drain_all: factor out lru_add_drain_needed Chris Metcalf
2016-01-04 19:34 ` [PATCH v9 04/13] task_isolation: add initial support Chris Metcalf
2016-01-19 15:42   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-01-19 20:45     ` Chris Metcalf
2016-01-28  0:28       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-01-29 18:18         ` Chris Metcalf
2016-01-30 21:11           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-02-11 19:24             ` Chris Metcalf
2016-03-04 12:56               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-03-09 19:39                 ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-08 13:56                   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-04-08 16:34                     ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-12 18:41                       ` Chris Metcalf
2016-04-22 13:16                       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-04-25 20:36                         ` Chris Metcalf
2016-05-26  1:07                       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-06-03 19:32                         ` Chris Metcalf
2016-06-29 15:18                           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-01 20:59                             ` Chris Metcalf
2016-07-05 14:41                               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-05 17:47                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2016-01-04 19:34 ` [PATCH v9 05/13] task_isolation: support PR_TASK_ISOLATION_STRICT mode Chris Metcalf
2016-01-04 19:34 ` [PATCH v9 06/13] task_isolation: add debug boot flag Chris Metcalf
2016-01-04 22:52   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-01-04 23:42     ` Chris Metcalf
2016-01-05 13:42       ` Steven Rostedt
2016-01-04 19:34 ` [PATCH v9 07/13] arch/x86: enable task isolation functionality Chris Metcalf
2016-01-04 21:02   ` [PATCH v9bis " Chris Metcalf
2016-01-04 19:34 ` [PATCH v9 08/13] arch/arm64: adopt prepare_exit_to_usermode() model from x86 Chris Metcalf
2016-01-04 20:33   ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-04 21:01     ` Chris Metcalf
2016-01-05 17:21       ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-05 17:33         ` [PATCH 1/2] arm64: entry: remove pointless SPSR mode check Mark Rutland
2016-01-06 12:15           ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2016-01-05 17:33         ` [PATCH 2/2] arm64: factor work_pending state machine to C Mark Rutland
2016-01-05 18:53           ` Chris Metcalf
2016-01-06 12:30           ` Catalin Marinas
2016-01-06 12:47             ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-06 13:43           ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-06 14:17             ` Catalin Marinas
2016-01-04 22:31     ` [PATCH v9 08/13] arch/arm64: adopt prepare_exit_to_usermode() model from x86 Andy Lutomirski
2016-01-05 18:01       ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-04 19:34 ` [PATCH v9 09/13] arch/arm64: enable task isolation functionality Chris Metcalf
2016-01-04 19:34 ` [PATCH v9 10/13] arch/tile: adopt prepare_exit_to_usermode() model from x86 Chris Metcalf
2016-01-04 19:34 ` [PATCH v9 11/13] arch/tile: move user_exit() to early kernel entry sequence Chris Metcalf
2016-01-04 19:34 ` [PATCH v9 12/13] arch/tile: enable task isolation functionality Chris Metcalf
2016-01-04 19:34 ` [PATCH v9 13/13] arm, tile: turn off timer tick for oneshot_stopped state Chris Metcalf
2016-01-11 21:15 ` [PATCH v9 00/13] support "task_isolation" mode for nohz_full Chris Metcalf
2016-01-12 10:07   ` Will Deacon
2016-01-12 17:49     ` Chris Metcalf
2016-01-13 10:44       ` Ingo Molnar
2016-01-13 21:19         ` Chris Metcalf
2016-01-20 13:27           ` Mark Rutland
2016-01-12 10:53   ` Ingo Molnar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160106121524.GL6301@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome