From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Vince Weaver <vince@deater.net>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 02/12] perf: Fix cgroup event scheduling
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:03:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160111220315.GI6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPqkBQXfyiTWN0FjZPfRokMTnp=+WdjkjT4OGk52MPf4vqKLA@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 11:43:40AM -0800, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Peter,
>
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > There appears to be a problemin __perf_event_task_sched_in() wrt
> > cgroup event scheduling.
> >
> > The normal event scheduling order is:
> >
> > CPU pinned
> > Task pinned
> > CPU flexible
> > Task flexible
> >
> > And since perf_cgroup_sched*() only schedules the cpu context, we must
> > call this _before_ adding the task events.
> >
> I understand this but I am trying to understand why cgroup system-wide event
> would be treated differently from regular system-wide events w.r.t. task events
> here.
This patch is about making cgroup events behave similarly to regular
system-wide events.
> If I do a cgroup flexible and a task pinned, what happens?
Look at perf_event_context_sched_in(), it will first remove the
cpu-flexible and then install everything:
cpu-pinned (skipped, because that would still be present)
task-pinned (new)
cpu-flexible (re-issue, possibly truncated due to the new pinned events)
task-flexible (new)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-11 22:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 67+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-11 16:24 [RFC][PATCH 00/12] various perf fixes Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-11 16:24 ` [RFC][PATCH 01/12] perf: Add lockdep assertions Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-11 16:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 02/12] perf: Fix cgroup event scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-11 19:43 ` Stephane Eranian
2016-01-11 22:03 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-01-11 16:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 03/12] perf: Fix cgroup scheduling in enable_on_exec Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-11 16:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 04/12] perf: Remove stale comment Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-11 16:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 05/12] perf: Fix enable_on_exec event scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-11 16:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 06/12] perf: Use task_ctx_sched_out() Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-11 16:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 07/12] perf: Simplify/fix perf_event_enable() event scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-08 10:04 ` James Morse
2016-03-08 10:26 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-03-08 10:42 ` James Morse
2016-03-08 11:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-11 16:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 08/12] perf: Optimize perf_sched_events usage Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-11 16:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 09/12] perf: Make ctx->is_active and cpuctx->task_ctx consistent Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-11 16:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 10/12] perf: Fix task context scheduling Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-11 16:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 11/12] perf: Specialize perf_event_exit_task() Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-11 16:25 ` [RFC][PATCH 12/12] perf: Collapse and fix event_function_call() users Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-13 10:50 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-13 13:46 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-01-13 17:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-13 15:00 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-01-13 15:38 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-01-13 18:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-13 20:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-14 10:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-14 16:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-17 22:38 ` Sasha Levin
2016-02-18 7:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-18 12:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-11 18:44 ` [RFC][PATCH 00/12] various perf fixes Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-11 19:56 ` Andi Kleen
2016-01-11 22:00 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-12 9:59 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-01-12 10:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2016-01-12 10:57 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-12 11:00 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-12 11:01 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-12 11:26 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-12 11:35 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-12 12:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-13 15:18 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-01-13 15:22 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-01-13 15:35 ` Alexander Shishkin
2016-01-14 9:35 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-14 10:05 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-15 15:04 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-15 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-15 15:47 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-15 16:01 ` Vince Weaver
2016-02-15 16:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-15 16:29 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-15 16:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-15 16:35 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-15 16:38 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-15 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-15 17:04 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-15 17:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-15 17:45 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-15 18:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-15 18:33 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-15 16:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-15 16:54 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2016-02-15 16:59 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-12 13:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-12 13:31 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160111220315.GI6344@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=vince@deater.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome