Re: livepatch/module: remove livepatch module notifier

[Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>]

+++ Jiri Kosina [16/02/16 00:42 +0100]:
>On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
>
>> So I think the commit causing the regression is 5156dca34a3e, which
>> occurred in the 4.5 cycle, *not* in 4.4.
>
>Agreed, by "4.4 regresion" I mean "regression compared to 4.4"; i.e.
>regression that will become real issue once 4.5 is released.
>
>> Also it's my understanding that only the third patch ("remove ftrace
>> module notifier") is needed to fix the regression, and the other patches
>> are just general improvements.  So if needed I think we can just rebase
>> that patch (which already has Rusty's ack I believe) and send it to
>> Linus now.
>
>3/4 and 4/4 are be sufficient, yes (although I'd like to have this
>confimed by Jessica, as she apparently already has a reliable testcase).

Yes, so Josh is right; technically only patch 3/4 "ftrace/module:
remove ftrace module notifier" is sufficient enough to fix the bug,
and patch 4/4 is just a natural extension of that change. Since I'm
going to be sending out another patchset anyway without the module.c
cleanups, I'll just keep them together.

Jessica

>To be honest: I was skiing (and being offline) thursday - sunday :), so my
>original plan was to get Ack from Rusty in the meantime, and then send
>pull request to Linus once I am back on sunday evening.
>
>This is not going to happen, so we have to start with plan B (which is
>pushing just 3/4 and 4/4). Jessica, could you please send me updated (and
>tested on your side) patchset with module.c cleanups omitted?
>
>Steven, I'd appreciate if you could tell me whether your Ack to
>"ftrace/module: remove ftrace module notifier" still holds even if
>module.c changes are not happening.
>
>Thanks,
>
>-- 
>Jiri Kosina
>SUSE Labs
>