* [PATCH v2] mm,oom: don't abort on exiting processes when selecting a victim.
@ 2016-02-17 14:31 Tetsuo Handa
2016-02-17 14:39 ` Michal Hocko
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tetsuo Handa @ 2016-02-17 14:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mhocko, akpm
Cc: rientjes, mgorman, oleg, torvalds, hughd, andrea, riel, linux-mm,
linux-kernel, Tetsuo Handa, Johannes Weiner
Currently, oom_scan_process_thread() returns OOM_SCAN_ABORT when there is
a thread which is exiting. But it is possible that that thread is blocked
at down_read(&mm->mmap_sem) in exit_mm() called from do_exit() whereas
one of threads sharing that memory is doing a GFP_KERNEL allocation
between down_write(&mm->mmap_sem) and up_write(&mm->mmap_sem)
(e.g. mmap()).
----------
T1 T2
Calls mmap()
Calls _exit(0)
Arrives at vm_mmap_pgoff()
Arrives at do_exit()
Gets PF_EXITING via exit_signals()
Calls down_write(&mm->mmap_sem)
Calls do_mmap_pgoff()
Calls down_read(&mm->mmap_sem) from exit_mm()
Calls out of memory via a GFP_KERNEL allocation but
oom_scan_process_thread(T1) returns OOM_SCAN_ABORT
----------
down_read(&mm->mmap_sem) by T1 is waiting for up_write(&mm->mmap_sem) by
T2 while oom_scan_process_thread() by T2 is waiting for T1 to set
T1->mm = NULL. Under such situation, the OOM killer does not choose
a victim, which results in silent OOM livelock problem.
This patch changes oom_scan_process_thread() not to return OOM_SCAN_ABORT
when there is a thread which is exiting.
Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
---
mm/oom_kill.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
index cf87153..6e6abaf 100644
--- a/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -292,9 +292,6 @@ enum oom_scan_t oom_scan_process_thread(struct oom_control *oc,
if (oom_task_origin(task))
return OOM_SCAN_SELECT;
- if (task_will_free_mem(task) && !is_sysrq_oom(oc))
- return OOM_SCAN_ABORT;
-
return OOM_SCAN_OK;
}
--
1.8.3.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2] mm,oom: don't abort on exiting processes when selecting a victim.
2016-02-17 14:31 [PATCH v2] mm,oom: don't abort on exiting processes when selecting a victim Tetsuo Handa
@ 2016-02-17 14:39 ` Michal Hocko
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Michal Hocko @ 2016-02-17 14:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Tetsuo Handa
Cc: akpm, rientjes, mgorman, oleg, torvalds, hughd, andrea, riel,
linux-mm, linux-kernel, Johannes Weiner
On Wed 17-02-16 23:31:25, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Currently, oom_scan_process_thread() returns OOM_SCAN_ABORT when there is
> a thread which is exiting. But it is possible that that thread is blocked
> at down_read(&mm->mmap_sem) in exit_mm() called from do_exit() whereas
> one of threads sharing that memory is doing a GFP_KERNEL allocation
> between down_write(&mm->mmap_sem) and up_write(&mm->mmap_sem)
> (e.g. mmap()).
>
> ----------
> T1 T2
> Calls mmap()
> Calls _exit(0)
> Arrives at vm_mmap_pgoff()
> Arrives at do_exit()
> Gets PF_EXITING via exit_signals()
> Calls down_write(&mm->mmap_sem)
> Calls do_mmap_pgoff()
> Calls down_read(&mm->mmap_sem) from exit_mm()
> Calls out of memory via a GFP_KERNEL allocation but
> oom_scan_process_thread(T1) returns OOM_SCAN_ABORT
> ----------
>
> down_read(&mm->mmap_sem) by T1 is waiting for up_write(&mm->mmap_sem) by
> T2 while oom_scan_process_thread() by T2 is waiting for T1 to set
> T1->mm = NULL. Under such situation, the OOM killer does not choose
> a victim, which results in silent OOM livelock problem.
>
> This patch changes oom_scan_process_thread() not to return OOM_SCAN_ABORT
> when there is a thread which is exiting.
Thank you for the updated changelog. This makes much more sense now.
This problem exists for quite some time but I would be hesitant to
mark it for stable because the side effects are quite hard to evaluate.
We could e.g. see a premature OOM killer invocation while the currently
exiting task just didn't get to finish and release its mm.
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> ---
> mm/oom_kill.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/oom_kill.c b/mm/oom_kill.c
> index cf87153..6e6abaf 100644
> --- a/mm/oom_kill.c
> +++ b/mm/oom_kill.c
> @@ -292,9 +292,6 @@ enum oom_scan_t oom_scan_process_thread(struct oom_control *oc,
> if (oom_task_origin(task))
> return OOM_SCAN_SELECT;
>
> - if (task_will_free_mem(task) && !is_sysrq_oom(oc))
> - return OOM_SCAN_ABORT;
> -
> return OOM_SCAN_OK;
> }
>
> --
> 1.8.3.1
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-17 14:39 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-17 14:31 [PATCH v2] mm,oom: don't abort on exiting processes when selecting a victim Tetsuo Handa
2016-02-17 14:39 ` Michal Hocko
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®