mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: mingo@kernel.org, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, eranian@google.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vince@deater.net,
	dvyukov@google.com, andi@firstfloor.org, jolsa@redhat.com,
	sasha.levin@oracle.com, oleg@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/7] perf: Fix scaling vs enable_on_exec
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 16:27:29 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160223152729.GT6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160219144132.043429490@infradead.org>

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 03:37:47PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Oleg reported that enable_on_exec results in weird scale factors.
> 
> The recent commit 3e349507d12d ("perf: Fix perf_enable_on_exec() event
> scheduling") caused this by moving task_ctx_sched_out() from before
> __perf_event_mask_enable() to after it.
> 
> The overlooked concequence of that change is that task_ctx_sched_out()
> would update the ctx time fields, and now __perf_event_mask_enable()
> uses stale time.
> 
> Fix this by adding an explicit time update.
> 
> While looking at this, I also found that we need an ctx->is_active
> check in perf_install_in_context().
> 
> XXX: does this actually fix the reported issue? I'm not sure what the
> reproduction case is. Also an earlier version made Jiri's machine
> explode -- something I've not managed to reproduce either.

Jiri, can you have a look at this and perhaps share the reproducer?

> Fixes: 3e349507d12d ("perf: Fix perf_enable_on_exec() event scheduling")
> Reported-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> ---
>  kernel/events/core.c |   18 ++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -2170,12 +2170,12 @@ perf_install_in_context(struct perf_even
>  		raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
>  		return;
>  	}
> -	update_context_time(ctx);
> -	/*
> -	 * Update cgrp time only if current cgrp matches event->cgrp.
> -	 * Must be done before calling add_event_to_ctx().
> -	 */
> -	update_cgrp_time_from_event(event);
> +
> +	if (ctx->is_active) {
> +		update_context_time(ctx);
> +		update_cgrp_time_from_event(event);
> +	}
> +
>  	add_event_to_ctx(event, ctx);
>  	raw_spin_unlock_irq(&ctx->lock);
>  
> @@ -3122,6 +3122,12 @@ static void perf_event_enable_on_exec(in
>  
>  	cpuctx = __get_cpu_context(ctx);
>  	perf_ctx_lock(cpuctx, ctx);
> +
> +	if (ctx->is_active) {
> +		update_context_time(ctx);
> +		update_cgrp_time_from_cpuctx(cpuctx);
> +	}
> +
>  	list_for_each_entry(event, &ctx->event_list, event_entry)
>  		enabled |= event_enable_on_exec(event, ctx);
>  
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-23 15:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-19 14:37 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] perf: more fuzzer inspired patches Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] perf: Close install vs exit race Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] perf: Do not double free Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] perf: Allow perf_release() with !event->ctx Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] perf: Fix scaling vs enable_on_exec Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-23 15:27   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-02-23 15:48     ` Jiri Olsa
2016-02-23 16:35       ` Pratyush Anand
2016-02-23 17:47         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 11:53           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 14:02             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-24 16:02               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-25  4:07                 ` Pratyush Anand
2016-02-23 21:44       ` Jiri Olsa
2016-02-26  2:25         ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] perf: Fix cloning Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] perf: Fix race between event install and jump_labels Peter Zijlstra
2016-02-19 14:37 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] perf: Cure event->pending_disable race Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160223152729.GT6357@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dvyukov@google.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    --cc=vince@deater.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome