mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Seth Forshee" <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
	"Stéphane Graber" <stgraber@ubuntu.com>,
	serge@hallyn.com, "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: user namespace and fully visible proc and sys mounts
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 02:28:20 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160306082820.GA1917@mail.hallyn.com> (raw)

Hi,

So we've been over this many times...  but unfortunately there is more
breakage to report.  Regular privileged and unprivileged containers
work all right for us.  But running an unprivileged container inside a
privileged container is blocked.

When creating privileged containers, lxc by default does a few things:
it mounts some fuse.lxcfs files over procfiles include /proc/meminfo and
/proc/uptime.  It mounts proc rw but /proc/sysrq-trigger ro as well as
moves /proc/sys/net out of the way, bind-mounts /proc/sys readonly
(because this container is not in a user namespace) then moves
/proc/sys/net back.  Finally it mounts sys ro but bind-mounts
/sys/devices/virtual/net as writeable.

If any of these are left enabled, unprivileged containers can't be
started.  If all are disabled, then they can be.

Can we find a way to make these not block remounts in child user
namespaces?  A boot flag, a procfs and sysfs mount option, a sysctl?

-serge

             reply	other threads:[~2016-03-06  8:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-06  8:28 Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2016-03-06 21:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-03-06 23:38   ` Serge E. Hallyn
2016-03-07  2:24   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-07  3:45     ` Serge E. Hallyn
2016-03-07  3:49       ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-07  5:03         ` Serge E. Hallyn
2016-03-08  0:07     ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-03-08  0:24       ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-08  4:05         ` Eric W. Biederman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160306082820.GA1917@mail.hallyn.com \
    --to=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
    --cc=stgraber@ubuntu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®