From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Seth Forshee" <seth.forshee@canonical.com>,
"Stéphane Graber" <stgraber@ubuntu.com>,
serge@hallyn.com, "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@amacapital.net>
Subject: user namespace and fully visible proc and sys mounts
Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2016 02:28:20 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160306082820.GA1917@mail.hallyn.com> (raw)
Hi,
So we've been over this many times... but unfortunately there is more
breakage to report. Regular privileged and unprivileged containers
work all right for us. But running an unprivileged container inside a
privileged container is blocked.
When creating privileged containers, lxc by default does a few things:
it mounts some fuse.lxcfs files over procfiles include /proc/meminfo and
/proc/uptime. It mounts proc rw but /proc/sysrq-trigger ro as well as
moves /proc/sys/net out of the way, bind-mounts /proc/sys readonly
(because this container is not in a user namespace) then moves
/proc/sys/net back. Finally it mounts sys ro but bind-mounts
/sys/devices/virtual/net as writeable.
If any of these are left enabled, unprivileged containers can't be
started. If all are disabled, then they can be.
Can we find a way to make these not block remounts in child user
namespaces? A boot flag, a procfs and sysfs mount option, a sysctl?
-serge
next reply other threads:[~2016-03-06 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-06 8:28 Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2016-03-06 21:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-03-06 23:38 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2016-03-07 2:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-07 3:45 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2016-03-07 3:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-07 5:03 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2016-03-08 0:07 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-03-08 0:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-03-08 4:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160306082820.GA1917@mail.hallyn.com \
--to=serge.hallyn@ubuntu.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=seth.forshee@canonical.com \
--cc=stgraber@ubuntu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®