* Re: rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel [not found] <AM2PR04MB09643A16272FB78B0D9FA103E76B0@AM2PR04MB0964.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> @ 2016-04-18 13:02 ` Akinobu Mita 2016-04-19 2:36 ` Qianyu Gong 2016-04-18 16:21 ` Alexandre Belloni 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Akinobu Mita @ 2016-04-18 13:02 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Qianyu Gong; +Cc: alexandre.belloni, Mingkai Hu, rtc-linux, linux-kernel 2016-04-18 15:15 GMT+09:00 Qianyu Gong <qianyu.gong@nxp.com>: > Hi Akinobu, > > > > I got an rtc call trace when booting 4.6 kernel on our board and I found it > > was caused by this patch: > > > > commit fc1dcb0b39dbb10d3290f2fcd6e154670f699166 > > Author: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> > > Date: Mon Mar 7 00:27:53 2016 +0900 > > > > rtc: ds3232: use rtc->ops_lock to protect alarm operations > > > > ds3232->mutex is used to protect for alarm operations which > > need to access status and control registers. > > > > But we can use rtc->ops_lock instead. rtc->ops_lock is held when most > > of rtc_class_ops methods are called, so we only need to explicitly > > acquire it from irq handler in order to protect form concurrent > > accesses. > > > > Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com > > > > The problem is that rtc->ops_lock would be accessed in ds3232_irq() > > without being initialized as rtc_device_register() is called too late. You have already identified the root cause of this issue. > As I’m not familiar with rtc things, could I just revert the patch or you > already > > have a solution to this problem? Thanks in advance. Could you check if the problem is resolved by moving the call of devm_rtc_device_register() from the end of ds3232_probe() to just before registering irq handler? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel 2016-04-18 13:02 ` rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel Akinobu Mita @ 2016-04-19 2:36 ` Qianyu Gong 2016-04-19 3:58 ` Akinobu Mita 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Qianyu Gong @ 2016-04-19 2:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Akinobu Mita; +Cc: alexandre.belloni, Mingkai Hu, rtc-linux, linux-kernel > -----Original Message----- > From: Akinobu Mita [mailto:akinobu.mita@gmail.com] > Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:02 PM > To: Qianyu Gong <qianyu.gong@nxp.com> > Cc: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; > rtc-linux@googlegroups.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel > > 2016-04-18 15:15 GMT+09:00 Qianyu Gong <qianyu.gong@nxp.com>: > > Hi Akinobu, > > > > > > > > I got an rtc call trace when booting 4.6 kernel on our board and I > > found it > > > > was caused by this patch: > > > > > > > > commit fc1dcb0b39dbb10d3290f2fcd6e154670f699166 > > > > Author: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> > > > > Date: Mon Mar 7 00:27:53 2016 +0900 > > > > > > > > rtc: ds3232: use rtc->ops_lock to protect alarm operations > > > > > > > > ds3232->mutex is used to protect for alarm operations which > > > > need to access status and control registers. > > > > > > > > But we can use rtc->ops_lock instead. rtc->ops_lock is held when > > most > > > > of rtc_class_ops methods are called, so we only need to explicitly > > > > acquire it from irq handler in order to protect form concurrent > > > > accesses. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com > > > > > > > > The problem is that rtc->ops_lock would be accessed in ds3232_irq() > > > > without being initialized as rtc_device_register() is called too late. > > You have already identified the root cause of this issue. > > > As I’m not familiar with rtc things, could I just revert the patch or > > you already > > > > have a solution to this problem? Thanks in advance. > > Could you check if the problem is resolved by moving the call of > devm_rtc_device_register() from the end of ds3232_probe() to just before > registering irq handler? Yes. It works(no call trace now). Regards, Qianyu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel 2016-04-19 2:36 ` Qianyu Gong @ 2016-04-19 3:58 ` Akinobu Mita 2016-04-19 4:11 ` Qianyu Gong 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Akinobu Mita @ 2016-04-19 3:58 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Qianyu Gong; +Cc: alexandre.belloni, Mingkai Hu, rtc-linux, linux-kernel 2016-04-19 11:36 GMT+09:00 Qianyu Gong <qianyu.gong@nxp.com>: > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Akinobu Mita [mailto:akinobu.mita@gmail.com] >> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:02 PM >> To: Qianyu Gong <qianyu.gong@nxp.com> >> Cc: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; >> rtc-linux@googlegroups.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >> Subject: Re: rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel >> >> 2016-04-18 15:15 GMT+09:00 Qianyu Gong <qianyu.gong@nxp.com>: >> > Hi Akinobu, >> > >> > >> > >> > I got an rtc call trace when booting 4.6 kernel on our board and I >> > found it >> > >> > was caused by this patch: >> > >> > >> > >> > commit fc1dcb0b39dbb10d3290f2fcd6e154670f699166 >> > >> > Author: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> >> > >> > Date: Mon Mar 7 00:27:53 2016 +0900 >> > >> > >> > >> > rtc: ds3232: use rtc->ops_lock to protect alarm operations >> > >> > >> > >> > ds3232->mutex is used to protect for alarm operations which >> > >> > need to access status and control registers. >> > >> > >> > >> > But we can use rtc->ops_lock instead. rtc->ops_lock is held when >> > most >> > >> > of rtc_class_ops methods are called, so we only need to explicitly >> > >> > acquire it from irq handler in order to protect form concurrent >> > >> > accesses. >> > >> > >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com >> > >> > >> > >> > The problem is that rtc->ops_lock would be accessed in ds3232_irq() >> > >> > without being initialized as rtc_device_register() is called too late. >> >> You have already identified the root cause of this issue. >> >> > As I’m not familiar with rtc things, could I just revert the patch or >> > you already >> > >> > have a solution to this problem? Thanks in advance. >> >> Could you check if the problem is resolved by moving the call of >> devm_rtc_device_register() from the end of ds3232_probe() to just before >> registering irq handler? > > Yes. It works(no call trace now). Thanks for testing. Do you mind submitting your patch to rtc-linux@googlegroups.com ? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel 2016-04-19 3:58 ` Akinobu Mita @ 2016-04-19 4:11 ` Qianyu Gong 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Qianyu Gong @ 2016-04-19 4:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Akinobu Mita; +Cc: alexandre.belloni, Mingkai Hu, rtc-linux, linux-kernel > -----Original Message----- > From: Akinobu Mita [mailto:akinobu.mita@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 11:58 AM > To: Qianyu Gong <qianyu.gong@nxp.com> > Cc: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; > rtc-linux@googlegroups.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel > > 2016-04-19 11:36 GMT+09:00 Qianyu Gong <qianyu.gong@nxp.com>: > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Akinobu Mita [mailto:akinobu.mita@gmail.com] > >> Sent: Monday, April 18, 2016 9:02 PM > >> To: Qianyu Gong <qianyu.gong@nxp.com> > >> Cc: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com; Mingkai Hu > >> <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; rtc-linux@googlegroups.com; > >> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > >> Subject: Re: rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel > >> > >> 2016-04-18 15:15 GMT+09:00 Qianyu Gong <qianyu.gong@nxp.com>: > >> > Hi Akinobu, > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > I got an rtc call trace when booting 4.6 kernel on our board and I > >> > found it > >> > > >> > was caused by this patch: > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > commit fc1dcb0b39dbb10d3290f2fcd6e154670f699166 > >> > > >> > Author: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> > >> > > >> > Date: Mon Mar 7 00:27:53 2016 +0900 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > rtc: ds3232: use rtc->ops_lock to protect alarm operations > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > ds3232->mutex is used to protect for alarm operations which > >> > > >> > need to access status and control registers. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > But we can use rtc->ops_lock instead. rtc->ops_lock is held > >> > when most > >> > > >> > of rtc_class_ops methods are called, so we only need to > >> > explicitly > >> > > >> > acquire it from irq handler in order to protect form concurrent > >> > > >> > accesses. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni > >> > <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > The problem is that rtc->ops_lock would be accessed in ds3232_irq() > >> > > >> > without being initialized as rtc_device_register() is called too late. > >> > >> You have already identified the root cause of this issue. > >> > >> > As I’m not familiar with rtc things, could I just revert the patch > >> > or you already > >> > > >> > have a solution to this problem? Thanks in advance. > >> > >> Could you check if the problem is resolved by moving the call of > >> devm_rtc_device_register() from the end of ds3232_probe() to just > >> before registering irq handler? > > > > Yes. It works(no call trace now). > > Thanks for testing. Do you mind submitting your patch to rtc- > linux@googlegroups.com ? No problem.:) Regards, Qianyu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel [not found] <AM2PR04MB09643A16272FB78B0D9FA103E76B0@AM2PR04MB0964.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> 2016-04-18 13:02 ` rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel Akinobu Mita @ 2016-04-18 16:21 ` Alexandre Belloni 2016-04-19 2:54 ` Qianyu Gong 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Alexandre Belloni @ 2016-04-18 16:21 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Qianyu Gong; +Cc: akinobu.mita, Mingkai Hu, rtc-linux, linux-kernel On 18/04/2016 at 06:15:40 +0000, Qianyu Gong wrote : > Hi Akinobu, > > I got an rtc call trace when booting 4.6 kernel on our board and I found it > was caused by this patch: > > commit fc1dcb0b39dbb10d3290f2fcd6e154670f699166 > Author: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> > Date: Mon Mar 7 00:27:53 2016 +0900 > > rtc: ds3232: use rtc->ops_lock to protect alarm operations > > ds3232->mutex is used to protect for alarm operations which > need to access status and control registers. > > But we can use rtc->ops_lock instead. rtc->ops_lock is held when most > of rtc_class_ops methods are called, so we only need to explicitly > acquire it from irq handler in order to protect form concurrent > accesses. > > Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com > > The problem is that rtc->ops_lock would be accessed in ds3232_irq() > without being initialized as rtc_device_register() is called too late. > > As I'm not familiar with rtc things, could I just revert the patch or you already > have a solution to this problem? Thanks in advance. > > Well, many RTC drivers actually suffer from that. I'm planning to change the infrastructure to handle this case better. Meanwhile, this is worth fixing. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* RE: rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel 2016-04-18 16:21 ` Alexandre Belloni @ 2016-04-19 2:54 ` Qianyu Gong 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Qianyu Gong @ 2016-04-19 2:54 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alexandre Belloni; +Cc: akinobu.mita, Mingkai Hu, rtc-linux, linux-kernel > -----Original Message----- > From: Alexandre Belloni [mailto:alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com] > Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2016 12:22 AM > To: Qianyu Gong <qianyu.gong@nxp.com> > Cc: akinobu.mita@gmail.com; Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@nxp.com>; rtc- > linux@googlegroups.com; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel > > On 18/04/2016 at 06:15:40 +0000, Qianyu Gong wrote : > > Hi Akinobu, > > > > I got an rtc call trace when booting 4.6 kernel on our board and I > > found it was caused by this patch: > > > > commit fc1dcb0b39dbb10d3290f2fcd6e154670f699166 > > Author: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> > > Date: Mon Mar 7 00:27:53 2016 +0900 > > > > rtc: ds3232: use rtc->ops_lock to protect alarm operations > > > > ds3232->mutex is used to protect for alarm operations which > > need to access status and control registers. > > > > But we can use rtc->ops_lock instead. rtc->ops_lock is held when most > > of rtc_class_ops methods are called, so we only need to explicitly > > acquire it from irq handler in order to protect form concurrent > > accesses. > > > > Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@gmail.com> > > Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com > > > > The problem is that rtc->ops_lock would be accessed in ds3232_irq() > > without being initialized as rtc_device_register() is called too late. > > > > As I'm not familiar with rtc things, could I just revert the patch or > > you already have a solution to this problem? Thanks in advance. > > > > > > Well, many RTC drivers actually suffer from that. I'm planning to change the > infrastructure to handle this case better. > Meanwhile, this is worth fixing. > > > -- > Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com Thanks. I followed Akinobu's suggest and put devm_rtc_device_register() just before registering the irq handler. The call trace disappeared. Looks like it's working well. Regards, Qianyu ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-04-19 4:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <AM2PR04MB09643A16272FB78B0D9FA103E76B0@AM2PR04MB0964.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
2016-04-18 13:02 ` rtc ds3232 call trace in kernel Akinobu Mita
2016-04-19 2:36 ` Qianyu Gong
2016-04-19 3:58 ` Akinobu Mita
2016-04-19 4:11 ` Qianyu Gong
2016-04-18 16:21 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-04-19 2:54 ` Qianyu Gong
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®