From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>, Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] perf core: Allow setting up max frame stack depth via sysctl
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 16:04:12 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160420230410.GA41736@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160420224730.GX3677@kernel.org>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 07:47:30PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> The default remains 127, which is good for most cases, and not even hit
> most of the time, but then for some cases, as reported by Brendan, 1024+
> deep frames are appearing on the radar for things like groovy, ruby.
>
> And in some workloads putting a _lower_ cap on this may make sense. One
> that is per event still needs to be put in place tho.
>
> The new file is:
>
> # cat /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_stack
> 127
>
> Chaging it:
>
> # echo 256 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_stack
> # cat /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_stack
> 256
>
> But as soon as there is some event using callchains we get:
>
> # echo 512 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_stack
> -bash: echo: write error: Device or resource busy
> #
>
> Because we only allocate the callchain percpu data structures when there
> is a user, which allows for changing the max easily, its just a matter
> of having no callchain users at that point.
>
> Reported-by: Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-cgls6uuncwjtq969tys1j6b0@git.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
Nice. I like it. That's a great approach to hard problem.
Java guys will be happy too.
Please also adjust two places in kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> + {
> + .procname = "perf_event_max_stack",
> + .data = NULL, /* filled in by handler */
> + .maxlen = sizeof(sysctl_perf_event_max_stack),
> + .mode = 0644,
> + .proc_handler = perf_event_max_stack_handler,
> + .extra1 = &zero,
zero seems to be the wrong minimum. I think it should be at least 2 to
to fit user/kernel tags ?
Probably needs to define max as well.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-20 23:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-20 22:47 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-20 23:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov [this message]
2016-04-22 20:52 ` [PATCH/RFC v2] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-22 21:37 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-22 22:05 ` David Ahern
2016-04-22 22:18 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-25 16:14 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-25 16:27 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-25 19:22 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-25 20:06 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-25 20:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-25 21:59 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-25 23:41 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-26 0:07 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-26 0:29 ` [PATCH/RFC v3] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-26 0:44 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-26 0:47 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-26 0:49 ` Brendan Gregg
2016-04-26 16:33 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-26 16:45 ` David Ahern
2016-04-27 13:20 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-26 20:02 ` Brendan Gregg
2016-04-26 21:05 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-26 21:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-27 12:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-26 21:58 ` Brendan Gregg
2016-04-26 22:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-27 12:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-26 21:58 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-04-27 12:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-27 16:09 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-04-27 16:27 ` David Ahern
2016-04-27 15:39 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-20 23:10 ` [PATCH/RFC] " David Ahern
2016-04-21 0:18 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-21 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-21 15:17 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-21 15:42 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160420230410.GA41736@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com \
--to=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com \
--cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®