mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com>,
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
	Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>,
	David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
	Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
	Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>, Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] perf core: Allow setting up max frame stack depth via sysctl
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:48:58 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160421104858.GH3408@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160420224730.GX3677@kernel.org>

On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 07:47:30PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> The default remains 127, which is good for most cases, and not even hit
> most of the time, but then for some cases, as reported by Brendan, 1024+
> deep frames are appearing on the radar for things like groovy, ruby.

yea gawds ;-)



> index 343c22f5e867..1390747b2195 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/callchain.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/callchain.c
> @@ -18,6 +18,14 @@ struct callchain_cpus_entries {
>  	struct perf_callchain_entry	*cpu_entries[0];
>  };
>  
> +int sysctl_perf_event_max_stack __read_mostly = PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH;
> +
> +static size_t perf_callchain_entry__sizeof(void)
> +{
> +	return sizeof(struct perf_callchain_entry) +
> +	       sizeof(__u64) * sysctl_perf_event_max_stack;
> +}
> +
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, callchain_recursion[PERF_NR_CONTEXTS]);
>  static atomic_t nr_callchain_events;
>  static DEFINE_MUTEX(callchain_mutex);
> @@ -73,7 +81,7 @@ static int alloc_callchain_buffers(void)
>  	if (!entries)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	size = sizeof(struct perf_callchain_entry) * PERF_NR_CONTEXTS;
> +	size = perf_callchain_entry__sizeof() * PERF_NR_CONTEXTS;
>  
>  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
>  		entries->cpu_entries[cpu] = kmalloc_node(size, GFP_KERNEL,

And this alloc _will_ fail if you put in a decent sized value..

Should we put in a dmesg WARN if this alloc fails and
perf_event_max_stack is 'large' ?

> @@ -215,3 +223,25 @@ exit_put:
>  
>  	return entry;
>  }
> +
> +int perf_event_max_stack_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write,
> +				 void __user *buffer, size_t *lenp, loff_t *ppos)
> +{
> +	int new_value = sysctl_perf_event_max_stack, ret;
> +	struct ctl_table new_table = *table;
> +
> +	new_table.data = &new_value;

cute :-)

> +	ret = proc_dointvec_minmax(&new_table, write, buffer, lenp, ppos);
> +	if (ret || !write)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&callchain_mutex);
> +	if (atomic_read(&nr_callchain_events))
> +		ret = -EBUSY;
> +	else
> +		sysctl_perf_event_max_stack = new_value;
> +	
> +	mutex_unlock(&callchain_mutex);
> +
> +	return ret;
> +}

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-21 10:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-20 22:47 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-20 23:04 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-22 20:52   ` [PATCH/RFC v2] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-22 21:37     ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-22 22:05     ` David Ahern
2016-04-22 22:18       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-25 16:14         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-25 16:27           ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-25 19:22             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-25 20:06               ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-25 20:17                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-25 21:59                   ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-25 23:41                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-26  0:07                       ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-26  0:29                         ` [PATCH/RFC v3] " Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-26  0:44                           ` Alexei Starovoitov
2016-04-26  0:47                             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-26  0:49                               ` Brendan Gregg
2016-04-26 16:33                                 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-26 16:45                                   ` David Ahern
2016-04-27 13:20                                     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-26 20:02                                 ` Brendan Gregg
2016-04-26 21:05                                   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-26 21:55                                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-27 12:53                                       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-26 21:58                                     ` Brendan Gregg
2016-04-26 22:10                                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-27 12:56                                       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-26 21:58                           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-04-27 12:53                             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-27 16:09                               ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-04-27 16:27                                 ` David Ahern
2016-04-27 15:39                           ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-20 23:10 ` [PATCH/RFC] " David Ahern
2016-04-21  0:18   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-21 10:48 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-04-21 15:17   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2016-04-21 15:42     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160421104858.GH3408@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com \
    --cc=dsahern@gmail.com \
    --cc=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=hekuang@huawei.com \
    --cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lizefan@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=milian.wolff@kdab.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
    --cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome