mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Haber <mh+linux-kernel@zugschlus.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm ML <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Major KVM issues with kernel 4.5 on the host
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:50:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160421145005.GI21755@torres.zugschlus.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160421123711.GD28821@pd.tnic>

On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:37:11PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:39:48AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Currently, I cannot explain how this has happened, I must have flagged
> > an actually good kernel as bad from my understanding of git bisect.
> > 
> > Can you give advice how to continue here?
> 
> Yap, sounds like you marked a bisection step incorrectly, which lead
> into the wrong direction. How reliable is your reproducer?

Usually, the crash or filesystem corruption happens in the first 15 to
30 minutes. I have had one instance running three hours before
corrupting, I have therefore upped the run time to nine hours before
saying "this kernel is good".

What bothers me is that since I ended up with a "suspect" commit that
actually results in a "good" kernel (running for 22 hours now), I must
have said "bad" to an actually "good" kernel, which means that I had
an unrelated crash or corruption. Is that reasoning correct?

> Also, do the bisection as Paolo suggested:
> 
> * try 45bdbcfdf241.

That one qualified as "good" six days ago. I'll retry, maybe I just
didn't wait long enough.

"Trying" means make oldconfig, make deb-pkg in my case right? Does it
matter what I answer to the numerous config questions that keep coming
up during the oldconfig step?

> * then do
> 
> $ git bisect start v4.5-rc1 v4.4
> 
> which marks -rc1 as bad and 4.4 as good.

Would it help to explicitly mark
0e749e54244eec87b2a3cd0a4314e60bc6781115 as good so that the knowledge
gained during the last week is not completely lost?

> While you're doing that bisect, do what Paolo said by applying the diff
> here
> 
>   https://lkml.kernel.org/r/570EADD2.8030300@redhat.com
> 
> when the bisection point you're at at each step contains
> 
>   46896c73c1a4 ("KVM: svm: add support for RDTSCP")
> 
> You should apply the above hunk by doing
> 
> $ patch -p1 --dry-run -i /tmp/hunk
> 
> If it applies fine, you then apply it
> 
> $ patch -p1 -i /tmp/hunk
> 
> All clear?

So I need to git log | grep 46896c73c1a4 and apply the patch again
each time the commit is found?

Greetings
Marc

-- 
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber         | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany    |  lose things."    Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature |  How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-21 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-03-17 16:54 Marc Haber
2016-03-17 18:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-18 10:01   ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-13 18:37     ` Marc Haber
2016-04-13 20:36       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-13 20:52         ` Marc Haber
2016-04-13 22:29         ` Marc Haber
2016-04-14  1:16           ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-14  5:22             ` Marc Haber
2016-04-21  8:39               ` Marc Haber
2016-04-21 12:37                 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-21 14:50                   ` Marc Haber [this message]
2016-04-21 16:51                     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-21 20:04                       ` Marc Haber
2016-04-23 16:04                         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-23 18:43                           ` Marc Haber
2016-04-23 18:52                             ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-05-12 20:20                               ` transparent huge pages breaks KVM on AMD Marc Haber
2016-05-12 20:24                                 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-05-12 20:34                                   ` Marc Haber
2016-05-12 20:42                                     ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-05-13  5:23                                       ` Marc Haber
2016-05-13  8:07                                         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-05-13  8:09                                           ` Borislav Petkov
2016-05-13 13:21                                             ` Marc Haber
2016-05-13 16:08                                               ` Borislav Petkov
2016-05-14  6:19                                             ` Marc Haber
2016-05-13  9:08                                           ` Marc Haber
2016-05-13  9:19                                             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-05-13 14:59                                           ` Marc Haber
2016-05-13  8:35                                 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-05-13 14:03                                   ` Marc Haber
2016-04-23 23:57                             ` Major KVM issues with kernel 4.5 on the host Borislav Petkov
2016-04-14  6:07             ` Marc Haber
2016-04-14 16:47             ` Marc Haber
2016-04-14 17:30               ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-14 17:47                 ` Marc Haber
2016-03-18 18:49   ` Marc Haber
2016-03-18 22:04     ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-19  0:08       ` Marc Haber
2016-03-20 13:31         ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-20 17:14           ` Andrey Korolyov
2016-03-20 18:25             ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-20 18:42               ` Andrey Korolyov
2016-03-20 18:58                 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-13 18:22                   ` Marc Haber
2016-04-13 20:37                     ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-13 18:20           ` Marc Haber
2016-03-21  9:08         ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160421145005.GI21755@torres.zugschlus.de \
    --to=mh+linux-kernel@zugschlus.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®