From: Marc Haber <mh+linux-kernel@zugschlus.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm ML <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Major KVM issues with kernel 4.5 on the host
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 16:50:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160421145005.GI21755@torres.zugschlus.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160421123711.GD28821@pd.tnic>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 02:37:11PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:39:48AM +0200, Marc Haber wrote:
> > Currently, I cannot explain how this has happened, I must have flagged
> > an actually good kernel as bad from my understanding of git bisect.
> >
> > Can you give advice how to continue here?
>
> Yap, sounds like you marked a bisection step incorrectly, which lead
> into the wrong direction. How reliable is your reproducer?
Usually, the crash or filesystem corruption happens in the first 15 to
30 minutes. I have had one instance running three hours before
corrupting, I have therefore upped the run time to nine hours before
saying "this kernel is good".
What bothers me is that since I ended up with a "suspect" commit that
actually results in a "good" kernel (running for 22 hours now), I must
have said "bad" to an actually "good" kernel, which means that I had
an unrelated crash or corruption. Is that reasoning correct?
> Also, do the bisection as Paolo suggested:
>
> * try 45bdbcfdf241.
That one qualified as "good" six days ago. I'll retry, maybe I just
didn't wait long enough.
"Trying" means make oldconfig, make deb-pkg in my case right? Does it
matter what I answer to the numerous config questions that keep coming
up during the oldconfig step?
> * then do
>
> $ git bisect start v4.5-rc1 v4.4
>
> which marks -rc1 as bad and 4.4 as good.
Would it help to explicitly mark
0e749e54244eec87b2a3cd0a4314e60bc6781115 as good so that the knowledge
gained during the last week is not completely lost?
> While you're doing that bisect, do what Paolo said by applying the diff
> here
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/570EADD2.8030300@redhat.com
>
> when the bisection point you're at at each step contains
>
> 46896c73c1a4 ("KVM: svm: add support for RDTSCP")
>
> You should apply the above hunk by doing
>
> $ patch -p1 --dry-run -i /tmp/hunk
>
> If it applies fine, you then apply it
>
> $ patch -p1 -i /tmp/hunk
>
> All clear?
So I need to git log | grep 46896c73c1a4 and apply the patch again
each time the commit is found?
Greetings
Marc
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header
Leimen, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402
Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-21 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-17 16:54 Marc Haber
2016-03-17 18:11 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-18 10:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-13 18:37 ` Marc Haber
2016-04-13 20:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-13 20:52 ` Marc Haber
2016-04-13 22:29 ` Marc Haber
2016-04-14 1:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-14 5:22 ` Marc Haber
2016-04-21 8:39 ` Marc Haber
2016-04-21 12:37 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-21 14:50 ` Marc Haber [this message]
2016-04-21 16:51 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-21 20:04 ` Marc Haber
2016-04-23 16:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-23 18:43 ` Marc Haber
2016-04-23 18:52 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-05-12 20:20 ` transparent huge pages breaks KVM on AMD Marc Haber
2016-05-12 20:24 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-05-12 20:34 ` Marc Haber
2016-05-12 20:42 ` Kirill A. Shutemov
2016-05-13 5:23 ` Marc Haber
2016-05-13 8:07 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-05-13 8:09 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-05-13 13:21 ` Marc Haber
2016-05-13 16:08 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-05-14 6:19 ` Marc Haber
2016-05-13 9:08 ` Marc Haber
2016-05-13 9:19 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-05-13 14:59 ` Marc Haber
2016-05-13 8:35 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2016-05-13 14:03 ` Marc Haber
2016-04-23 23:57 ` Major KVM issues with kernel 4.5 on the host Borislav Petkov
2016-04-14 6:07 ` Marc Haber
2016-04-14 16:47 ` Marc Haber
2016-04-14 17:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-14 17:47 ` Marc Haber
2016-03-18 18:49 ` Marc Haber
2016-03-18 22:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-19 0:08 ` Marc Haber
2016-03-20 13:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-20 17:14 ` Andrey Korolyov
2016-03-20 18:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-03-20 18:42 ` Andrey Korolyov
2016-03-20 18:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2016-04-13 18:22 ` Marc Haber
2016-04-13 20:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-04-13 18:20 ` Marc Haber
2016-03-21 9:08 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160421145005.GI21755@torres.zugschlus.de \
--to=mh+linux-kernel@zugschlus.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®