From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: "Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)" <elliott@hpe.com>
Cc: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>, Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>,
"linux-efi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-efi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] block: partitions: efi: Always check for alternative GPT at end of drive
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 14:15:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160426211547.GC16601@linux-uzut.site> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94D0CD8314A33A4D9D801C0FE68B402963904365@G4W3296.americas.hpqcorp.net>
On Tue, 26 Apr 2016, Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory) wrote:
>The UEFI specification is not ambiguous - you should always look
>for the backup GPT Header at the last LBA:
>
>"Two GPT Header structures are stored on the device: the primary
>and the backup. The primary GPT Header must be located in LBA 1
>(i.e., the second logical block), and the backup GPT Header must
>be located in the last LBA of the device."
>
>If the primary GPT Header is corrupted (e.g., CRC is bad), you
>cannot trust any fields in it, including the Alternate LBA field.
I'm well aware of this, and is really what I meant with 'ambiguous'
(which was ambiguous in itself). All I'm arguing is that I don't see
a solid reason to change the default, when we have (and have had for
a long time) the gpt param alternative.
>The Alternate LBA field is there to help you tolerate failures
>while growing or shrinking the block device size (not important
>for individual physical drives, but an issue for logical drives
>presented by RAID controllers).
I have nothing against the agpt, just pass a boot param and voila,
you can use it. This is not some sort of recent regression we are
talking about here. How is this such a burden all of a sudden?
Thanks,
Davidlohr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-26 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-26 1:06 Julius Werner
2016-04-26 10:20 ` Karel Zak
2016-04-26 18:33 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-04-26 20:13 ` Julius Werner
2016-04-26 20:34 ` Elliott, Robert (Persistent Memory)
2016-04-26 21:15 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2016-04-26 21:51 ` Gwendal Grignou
2016-04-27 15:09 ` Karel Zak
2016-04-27 15:45 ` Doug Anderson
2016-04-27 21:44 ` Julius Werner
2016-04-27 6:00 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2016-04-27 12:59 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-04-26 14:38 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
2016-04-26 18:10 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-04-26 19:27 ` Austin S. Hemmelgarn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160426211547.GC16601@linux-uzut.site \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dianders@chromium.org \
--cc=elliott@hpe.com \
--cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
--cc=jwerner@chromium.org \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome