mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Waiman Long <waiman.long@hpe.com>
Cc: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	manfred@colorfullife.com, mingo@kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, ggherdovich@suse.com,
	mgorman@techsingularity.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Subject: Re: sem_lock() vs qspinlocks
Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 22:53:00 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160520205300.GJ3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <573F7723.8030201@hpe.com>

On Fri, May 20, 2016 at 04:44:19PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
> On 05/20/2016 07:58 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:39:26PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> >>As such, the following restores the behavior of the ticket locks and 'fixes'
> >>(or hides?) the bug in sems. Naturally incorrect approach:
> >>
> >>@@ -290,7 +290,8 @@ static void sem_wait_array(struct sem_array *sma)
> >>
> >>	for (i = 0; i<  sma->sem_nsems; i++) {
> >>		sem = sma->sem_base + i;
> >>-               spin_unlock_wait(&sem->lock);
> >>+               while (atomic_read(&sem->lock))
> >>+                       cpu_relax();
> >>	}
> >>	ipc_smp_acquire__after_spin_is_unlocked();
> >>}
> >The actual bug is clear_pending_set_locked() not having acquire
> >semantics. And the above 'fixes' things because it will observe the old
> >pending bit or the locked bit, so it doesn't matter if the store
> >flipping them is delayed.
> 
> The clear_pending_set_locked() is not the only place where the lock is set.
> If there are more than one waiter, the queuing patch will be used instead.
> The set_locked(), which is also an unordered store, will then be used to set
> the lock.

Ah yes. I didn't get that far. One case was enough :-)

      reply	other threads:[~2016-05-20 20:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-20  5:39 Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-20  7:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20 15:00   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-20 15:05     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20 15:25       ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-20 15:28       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20 20:47     ` Waiman Long
2016-05-20 20:52       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-21  0:59         ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-21  4:01           ` Waiman Long
2016-05-21  7:40             ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20  7:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20  8:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20  8:18   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20  9:07     ` Giovanni Gherdovich
2016-05-20  9:34       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20  8:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20  9:00   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20 10:09     ` Ingo Molnar
2016-05-20 10:45       ` Mel Gorman
2016-05-20 11:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20 14:05   ` Boqun Feng
2016-05-20 15:21     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20 16:04       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20 17:00         ` Linus Torvalds
2016-05-20 21:06           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20 21:44             ` Linus Torvalds
2016-05-21  0:48               ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-21  2:30                 ` Linus Torvalds
2016-05-21  7:37                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-21 13:49                   ` Manfred Spraul
2016-05-24 10:57                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-21 17:14                   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-23 12:25           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-23 17:52             ` Linus Torvalds
2016-05-25  6:37               ` Boqun Feng
2016-05-22  8:43         ` Manfred Spraul
2016-05-22  9:38           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-20 16:20   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-20 20:44   ` Waiman Long
2016-05-20 20:53     ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160520205300.GJ3193@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=ggherdovich@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manfred@colorfullife.com \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=waiman.long@hpe.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome