mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/ptrace: Remove questionable TS_COMPAT usage in ptrace
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2016 23:19:07 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160619211906.GA14712@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94bda8cd5f326ae5591c80fb5d7c1c22624accec.1466244711.git.luto@kernel.org>

Let me first thank Pedro who has already replied!

And I have to admit I will need to re-read his explanations after
sleep to (try to) convince myself I fully understans the problems ;)
Too late for me.

Right now I have nothing to add, but

On 06/18, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>
> @@ -922,16 +922,7 @@ static int putreg32(struct task_struct *child, unsigned regno, u32 value)
>  	R32(esp, sp);
>  
>  	case offsetof(struct user32, regs.orig_eax):
> -		/*
> -		 * A 32-bit debugger setting orig_eax means to restore
> -		 * the state of the task restarting a 32-bit syscall.
> -		 * Make sure we interpret the -ERESTART* codes correctly
> -		 * in case the task is not actually still sitting at the
> -		 * exit from a 32-bit syscall with TS_COMPAT still set.
> -		 */
>  		regs->orig_ax = value;
> -		if (syscall_get_nr(child, regs) >= 0)
> -			task_thread_info(child)->status |= TS_COMPAT;

I agree it would be nice to remove this code, but then it is not clear
how/when we should sign-extend regs->ax..

And this leads to another question, why do we actually need to set/clear
TS_COMPAT in set_personality_ia32() ??

Oleg.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-06-19 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-18 10:21 Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-18 13:55 ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-18 14:41   ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-18 17:02   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-19 22:09     ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-20 10:27       ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-20 15:24       ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-20 16:30         ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-20 16:14           ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-20 17:25             ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-20 10:07     ` Pedro Alves
2016-06-20 11:12       ` Jan Kratochvil
2016-06-18 17:48 ` Kees Cook
2016-06-19 21:19 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2016-06-19 22:23   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-20  6:12   ` Andy Lutomirski
2016-06-20 15:31     ` Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-20 17:53     ` the usage of __SYSCALL_MASK in entry_SYSCALL_64/do_syscall_64 is not consistent Oleg Nesterov
2016-06-21 19:01       ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160619211906.GA14712@redhat.com \
    --to=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome