mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, der.herr@hofr.at,
	peterz@infradead.org, dave@stgolabs.net, riel@redhat.com,
	viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	wagi@monom.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] perpcu rwsem, fs/locks and killing lglocks
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 21:40:54 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160905194054.369038779@infradead.org> (raw)

Hi all,

Here are some patches that I've been sitting on for far too long now.

They're a respin of earlier work [1], and have been verified by Daniel Wagner
to not suffer the regression he measured with the previous set (part of which
was operator error).

Patches 4 and 5 were needed to solve a (smallish) performance regression on
CONFIG_PREEMPT=y. They avoid a number of preemption points (and code).

I was going to gather pretty numbers from Daniels data, but I keep putting that
off and figured I ought to send the patches already.

[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20150622121623.291363374@infradead.org

---
 Documentation/locking/lglock.txt | 166 ---------------------------------------
 fs/Kconfig                       |   1 +
 fs/locks.c                       |  68 +++++++++++-----
 include/linux/lglock.h           |  81 -------------------
 include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h     |  36 +++++++--
 kernel/locking/Makefile          |   1 -
 kernel/locking/lglock.c          | 111 --------------------------
 kernel/stop_machine.c            |  42 ++++++----
 8 files changed, 107 insertions(+), 399 deletions(-)

             reply	other threads:[~2016-09-05 19:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-05 19:40 Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-09-05 19:40 ` [PATCH 1/7] percpu-rwsem: DEFINE_STATIC_PERCPU_RWSEM Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-05 19:40 ` [PATCH 2/7] fs/locks: Replace lg_global with a percpu-rwsem Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-05 19:40 ` [PATCH 3/7] fs/locks: Replace lg_local with a per-cpu spinlock Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-05 19:40 ` [PATCH 4/7] percpu-rwsem: Add down_read_preempt_disable() Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-05 19:40 ` [PATCH 5/7] fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-05 19:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] stop_machine: Remove stop_cpus_lock and lg_double_lock/unlock() Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-05 19:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] locking: Remove lglock Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-06  4:45 ` [PATCH 0/7] perpcu rwsem, fs/locks and killing lglocks Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160905194054.369038779@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=der.herr@hofr.at \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=wagi@monom.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome