mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: oleg@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, tj@kernel.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, der.herr@hofr.at,
	peterz@infradead.org, dave@stgolabs.net, riel@redhat.com,
	viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk, torvalds@linux-foundation.org,
	wagi@monom.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/7] fs/locks: Replace lg_local with a per-cpu spinlock
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2016 21:40:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160905194127.199886988@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160905194054.369038779@infradead.org>

[-- Attachment #1: peter_zijlstra-fs_locks-replace_lg_local_with_a_per-cpu_spinlock.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4582 bytes --]

As Oleg suggested, replace file_lock_list with a structure containing
the hlist head and a spinlock.

This completely removes the lglock from fs/locks.

Cc: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: oleg@redhat.com
Cc: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: tj@kernel.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com
Cc: der.herr@hofr.at
Cc: dave@stgolabs.net
Cc: riel@redhat.com
Cc: torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Suggested-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 fs/Kconfig |    1 +
 fs/locks.c |   47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/Kconfig
+++ b/fs/Kconfig
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ config EXPORTFS
 config FILE_LOCKING
 	bool "Enable POSIX file locking API" if EXPERT
 	default y
+	select PERCPU_RWSEM
 	help
 	  This option enables standard file locking support, required
           for filesystems like NFS and for the flock() system
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -128,7 +128,6 @@
 #include <linux/pid_namespace.h>
 #include <linux/hashtable.h>
 #include <linux/percpu.h>
-#include <linux/lglock.h>
 
 #define CREATE_TRACE_POINTS
 #include <trace/events/filelock.h>
@@ -159,12 +158,17 @@ int lease_break_time = 45;
 
 /*
  * The global file_lock_list is only used for displaying /proc/locks, so we
- * keep a list on each CPU, with each list protected by its own spinlock via
- * the file_lock_lglock. Note that alterations to the list also require that
- * the relevant flc_lock is held.
+ * keep a list on each CPU, with each list protected by its own spinlock.
+ * Global serialization is done using file_rwsem.
+ *
+ * Note that alterations to the list also require that the relevant flc_lock is
+ * held.
  */
-DEFINE_STATIC_LGLOCK(file_lock_lglock);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hlist_head, file_lock_list);
+struct file_lock_list_struct {
+	spinlock_t		lock;
+	struct hlist_head	hlist;
+};
+static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct file_lock_list_struct, file_lock_list);
 DEFINE_STATIC_PERCPU_RWSEM(file_rwsem);
 
 /*
@@ -557,17 +561,21 @@ static int posix_same_owner(struct file_
 /* Must be called with the flc_lock held! */
 static void locks_insert_global_locks(struct file_lock *fl)
 {
+	struct file_lock_list_struct *fll = this_cpu_ptr(&file_lock_list);
+
 	percpu_rwsem_assert_held(&file_rwsem);
 
-	lg_local_lock(&file_lock_lglock);
+	spin_lock(&fll->lock);
 	fl->fl_link_cpu = smp_processor_id();
-	hlist_add_head(&fl->fl_link, this_cpu_ptr(&file_lock_list));
-	lg_local_unlock(&file_lock_lglock);
+	hlist_add_head(&fl->fl_link, &fll->hlist);
+	spin_unlock(&fll->lock);
 }
 
 /* Must be called with the flc_lock held! */
 static void locks_delete_global_locks(struct file_lock *fl)
 {
+	struct file_lock_list_struct *fll;
+
 	percpu_rwsem_assert_held(&file_rwsem);
 
 	/*
@@ -577,9 +585,11 @@ static void locks_delete_global_locks(st
 	 */
 	if (hlist_unhashed(&fl->fl_link))
 		return;
-	lg_local_lock_cpu(&file_lock_lglock, fl->fl_link_cpu);
+
+	fll = per_cpu_ptr(&file_lock_list, fl->fl_link_cpu);
+	spin_lock(&fll->lock);
 	hlist_del_init(&fl->fl_link);
-	lg_local_unlock_cpu(&file_lock_lglock, fl->fl_link_cpu);
+	spin_unlock(&fll->lock);
 }
 
 static unsigned long
@@ -2653,9 +2663,8 @@ static void *locks_start(struct seq_file
 
 	iter->li_pos = *pos + 1;
 	percpu_down_write(&file_rwsem);
-	lg_global_lock(&file_lock_lglock);
 	spin_lock(&blocked_lock_lock);
-	return seq_hlist_start_percpu(&file_lock_list, &iter->li_cpu, *pos);
+	return seq_hlist_start_percpu(&file_lock_list.hlist, &iter->li_cpu, *pos);
 }
 
 static void *locks_next(struct seq_file *f, void *v, loff_t *pos)
@@ -2663,14 +2672,13 @@ static void *locks_next(struct seq_file
 	struct locks_iterator *iter = f->private;
 
 	++iter->li_pos;
-	return seq_hlist_next_percpu(v, &file_lock_list, &iter->li_cpu, pos);
+	return seq_hlist_next_percpu(v, &file_lock_list.hlist, &iter->li_cpu, pos);
 }
 
 static void locks_stop(struct seq_file *f, void *v)
 	__releases(&blocked_lock_lock)
 {
 	spin_unlock(&blocked_lock_lock);
-	lg_global_unlock(&file_lock_lglock);
 	percpu_up_write(&file_rwsem);
 }
 
@@ -2712,10 +2720,13 @@ static int __init filelock_init(void)
 	filelock_cache = kmem_cache_create("file_lock_cache",
 			sizeof(struct file_lock), 0, SLAB_PANIC, NULL);
 
-	lg_lock_init(&file_lock_lglock, "file_lock_lglock");
 
-	for_each_possible_cpu(i)
-		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(per_cpu_ptr(&file_lock_list, i));
+	for_each_possible_cpu(i) {
+		struct file_lock_list_struct *fll = per_cpu_ptr(&file_lock_list, i);
+
+		spin_lock_init(&fll->lock);
+		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&fll->hlist);
+	}
 
 	return 0;
 }

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-09-05 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-05 19:40 [PATCH 0/7] perpcu rwsem, fs/locks and killing lglocks Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-05 19:40 ` [PATCH 1/7] percpu-rwsem: DEFINE_STATIC_PERCPU_RWSEM Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-05 19:40 ` [PATCH 2/7] fs/locks: Replace lg_global with a percpu-rwsem Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-05 19:40 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-09-05 19:40 ` [PATCH 4/7] percpu-rwsem: Add down_read_preempt_disable() Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-05 19:40 ` [PATCH 5/7] fs/locks: Use percpu_down_read_preempt_disable Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-05 19:41 ` [PATCH 6/7] stop_machine: Remove stop_cpus_lock and lg_double_lock/unlock() Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-05 19:41 ` [PATCH 7/7] locking: Remove lglock Peter Zijlstra
2016-09-06  4:45 ` [PATCH 0/7] perpcu rwsem, fs/locks and killing lglocks Mike Galbraith

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160905194127.199886988@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=der.herr@hofr.at \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=wagi@monom.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®