mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>
Cc: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Wagner <daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ming Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] firmware_class: encapsulate firmware loading status
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2016 02:30:23 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160907003023.GW3296@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6c589f0a-6503-6104-c10c-80ebd6884995@monom.org>

On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 09:13:45AM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> Hi Luis,
> 
> On 08/30/2016 09:34 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> >On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 04:18:33PM +0200, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> >>On 08/29/2016 11:50 AM, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> >>I forgot to answer your question. So we have the dependency to
> >>loading_timeout/firmware_loading_timeout from the firmware caching
> >>path. The patch added in the previous email removes that dependency.
> >>
> >>We still need the 60 second even in the
> >>!CONFIG_FW_LOADER_USER_HELPER case. I think it would be a regression
> >>if we change that value, no?
> >
> >Oh that might be the disconnect, see my series of pending patches, I did away
> >with the cache stuff using the usermode helper, the cache stuff should not use
> >the usermode helper as the cache stuff kills off the pending usermode helper
> >requests right before suspend.
> 
> The question is how do we proceed from here. I suggest that I don't
> touch the fw cache path in my patches. Basically, leave it as it
> now. After your series in, we cleanup this bit here, maybe even move
> the user helper stuff into its own file.
> 
> I think this code is a big interleaved puzzle. Best thing is to
> split it up and figure out what interacts with what. Moving this
> bits here out is definitely the right direction.

How about I remove the timeout crap form the cache stuff in my patch
as you noted and fold then your changes on top of that pending series?

  Luis

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-07  0:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-08-25  9:52 [PATCH v3 0/3] " Daniel Wagner
2016-08-25  9:52 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] " Daniel Wagner
2016-08-25 17:50   ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-08-29  9:50     ` Daniel Wagner
2016-08-29 14:18       ` Daniel Wagner
2016-08-30 19:34         ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2016-08-31  7:13           ` Daniel Wagner
2016-09-07  0:30             ` Luis R. Rodriguez [this message]
2016-08-25  9:52 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] firmware_class: Drop bit ops in favor of simple state machine Daniel Wagner
2016-08-25  9:52 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] firmware_class: Do not use fw_lock for fw_status protection Daniel Wagner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160907003023.GW3296@wotan.suse.de \
    --to=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel.wagner@bmw-carit.de \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ming.lei@canonical.com \
    --cc=wagi@monom.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®