From: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>,
Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Subject: Re: pstore/core: drop cmpxchg based updates
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2016 14:32:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160908213205.GA4276@roeck-us.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160824130935.23110-1-bigeasy@linutronix.de>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:09:35PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> I have here a FPGA behind PCIe which exports SRAM which I use for
> pstore. Now it seems that the FPGA no longer supports cmpxchg based
> updates and writes back 0xff…ff and returns the same. This leads to
> crash during crash rendering pstore useless.
> Since I doubt that there is much benefit from using cmpxchg() here, I am
> dropping this atomic access and use the spinlock based version.
>
> Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>
> Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Tested-by: Rabin Vincent <rabinv@axis.com>
Great, one item taken off my task list.
As Rabin suggested, this patch is needed for at least some ARM chips,
and should be applied to stable releases.
Reviewed-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
> ---
> fs/pstore/ram_core.c | 43 ++-----------------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
> index 76c3f80efdfa..4bae54bb61cd 100644
> --- a/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
> +++ b/fs/pstore/ram_core.c
> @@ -47,39 +47,6 @@ static inline size_t buffer_start(struct persistent_ram_zone *prz)
> return atomic_read(&prz->buffer->start);
> }
>
> -/* increase and wrap the start pointer, returning the old value */
> -static size_t buffer_start_add_atomic(struct persistent_ram_zone *prz, size_t a)
> -{
> - int old;
> - int new;
> -
> - do {
> - old = atomic_read(&prz->buffer->start);
> - new = old + a;
> - while (unlikely(new >= prz->buffer_size))
> - new -= prz->buffer_size;
> - } while (atomic_cmpxchg(&prz->buffer->start, old, new) != old);
> -
> - return old;
> -}
> -
> -/* increase the size counter until it hits the max size */
> -static void buffer_size_add_atomic(struct persistent_ram_zone *prz, size_t a)
> -{
> - size_t old;
> - size_t new;
> -
> - if (atomic_read(&prz->buffer->size) == prz->buffer_size)
> - return;
> -
> - do {
> - old = atomic_read(&prz->buffer->size);
> - new = old + a;
> - if (new > prz->buffer_size)
> - new = prz->buffer_size;
> - } while (atomic_cmpxchg(&prz->buffer->size, old, new) != old);
> -}
> -
> static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(buffer_lock);
>
> /* increase and wrap the start pointer, returning the old value */
> @@ -124,9 +91,6 @@ static void buffer_size_add_locked(struct persistent_ram_zone *prz, size_t a)
> raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&buffer_lock, flags);
> }
>
> -static size_t (*buffer_start_add)(struct persistent_ram_zone *, size_t) = buffer_start_add_atomic;
> -static void (*buffer_size_add)(struct persistent_ram_zone *, size_t) = buffer_size_add_atomic;
> -
> static void notrace persistent_ram_encode_rs8(struct persistent_ram_zone *prz,
> uint8_t *data, size_t len, uint8_t *ecc)
> {
> @@ -338,9 +302,9 @@ int notrace persistent_ram_write(struct persistent_ram_zone *prz,
> c = prz->buffer_size;
> }
>
> - buffer_size_add(prz, c);
> + buffer_size_add_locked(prz, c);
>
> - start = buffer_start_add(prz, c);
> + start = buffer_start_add_locked(prz, c);
>
> rem = prz->buffer_size - start;
> if (unlikely(rem < c)) {
> @@ -426,9 +390,6 @@ static void *persistent_ram_iomap(phys_addr_t start, size_t size,
> return NULL;
> }
>
> - buffer_start_add = buffer_start_add_locked;
> - buffer_size_add = buffer_size_add_locked;
> -
> if (memtype)
> va = ioremap(start, size);
> else
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-08 21:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-08-24 13:09 [PATCH] " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-09-08 10:23 ` Rabin Vincent
2016-09-08 21:32 ` Guenter Roeck [this message]
2016-09-08 22:01 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160908213205.GA4276@roeck-us.net \
--to=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=anton@enomsg.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=ccross@android.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome