From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
To: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Phidias Chiang <phidias.chiang@canonical.com>,
Anisse Astier <anisse@astier.eu>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
Yu C Chen <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Add possibility to mask which GPIOs are added to IRQ domain
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2016 21:12:44 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160915181244.GI1811@lahna.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <57DAC75E.5080203@arm.com>
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 05:07:58PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> Mika,
>
> On 15/09/16 16:52, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > When using GPIO irqchip helpers to setup irqchip for a gpiolib based
> > driver, it is not possible to select which GPIOs to add to the IRQ domain.
> > Instead it just adds all GPIOs which is not always desired. For example
> > there might be GPIOs that for some reason just cannot be used as interrupts
> > at all.
> >
> > To make this possible we add valid_mask to each gpio_chip and by default
> > assume all GPIOs can be used as interrupts. Drivers can then tune this
> > using clear_bit() or similar before they call gpiochip_irqchip_add().
> >
> > Suggested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> > include/linux/gpio/driver.h | 1 +
> > 2 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > index 53ff25ac66d8..d84c23b47f44 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
> > @@ -1186,6 +1186,18 @@ int gpiochip_add_data(struct gpio_chip *chip, void *data)
> > if (status)
> > goto err_remove_chip;
> > }
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP
> > + chip->valid_mask = kcalloc(BITS_TO_LONGS(chip->ngpio), sizeof(long),
> > + GFP_KERNEL);
>
> Do we really want to make this a mandatory thing? In most cases, I'd
> expect this valid_mask to have all bits set, so you might as well not
> allocate it at all in that case (and only allocate it if you actually
> need it).
We can make drivers to allocate it and only if set use it in core.
>
> > + if (!chip->valid_mask)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
>
> You really want to revise your error handling here.
Oops, right. It should be:
if (!chip->valid_mask) {
status = -ENOMEM;
goto err_remove_chip;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-15 18:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-22 7:56 [PATCH] pinctrl: cherryview: Do not mask all interrupts on probe Mika Westerberg
2015-06-01 9:23 ` Mika Westerberg
2015-06-02 13:53 ` Linus Walleij
2015-06-02 14:15 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-08-16 16:12 ` Anisse Astier
2016-08-17 8:13 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-08-17 13:42 ` Anisse Astier
2016-08-18 12:13 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-08-18 13:52 ` Anisse Astier
2016-08-18 13:58 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-08 10:13 ` Phidias Chiang
2016-09-08 10:24 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-08 16:28 ` Phidias Chiang
2016-09-09 6:18 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-09 8:23 ` Phidias Chiang
2016-09-09 8:58 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-11 8:05 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-12 6:56 ` Phidias Chiang
2016-09-12 9:04 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-12 13:04 ` Phidias Chiang
2016-09-12 13:11 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-13 9:18 ` Linus Walleij
2016-09-13 9:33 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-13 12:22 ` Linus Walleij
2016-09-13 12:52 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-13 20:57 ` Linus Walleij
2016-09-14 8:26 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-14 12:46 ` Linus Walleij
2016-09-14 15:12 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-15 12:39 ` Linus Walleij
2016-09-15 15:42 ` Mika Westerberg
2016-09-15 15:52 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Add possibility to mask which GPIOs are added to IRQ domain Mika Westerberg
2016-09-15 15:52 ` [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: cherryview: Do not add all southwest and north GPIOs " Mika Westerberg
2016-09-15 16:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] gpiolib: Add possibility to mask which GPIOs are added " Marc Zyngier
2016-09-15 18:12 ` Mika Westerberg [this message]
2016-09-15 18:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-09-18 11:16 ` Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160915181244.GI1811@lahna.fi.intel.com \
--to=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anisse@astier.eu \
--cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=phidias.chiang@canonical.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome