mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: mingo@kernel.org, juri.lelli@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	xlpang@redhat.com, bigeasy@linutronix.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	jdesfossez@efficios.com, bristot@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI
Date: Sat, 8 Oct 2016 18:55:40 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161008165540.GI3568@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1610081726270.5222@nanos>

On Sat, Oct 08, 2016 at 05:53:49PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Oct 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Solve all that by:
> > 
> >  - using futex specific rt_mutex calls that lack the fastpath, futexes
> >    have their own fastpath anyway. This makes that
> >    rt_mutex_futex_unlock() doesn't need to drop rt_mutex::wait_lock
> >    and the unlock is guaranteed if we manage to update user state.
> > 
> >  - make futex_unlock_pi() drop hb->lock early and only use
> >    rt_mutex::wait_lock to serialize against rt_mutex waiters
> >    update the futex value and unlock.
> > 
> >  - in case futex and rt_mutex disagree on waiters, side with rt_mutex
> >    and simply clear the user value. This works because either there
> >    really are no waiters left, or futex_lock_pi() triggers the
> >    lock-steal path and fixes up the WAITERS flag.
> 
> I stared at this for a few hours and while I'm not yet done analyzing all
> possible combinations I found at least one thing which is broken:
> 
> CPU 0				CPU 1
> 
> unlock_pi(f)
>   ....
>   unlock(hb->lock)
>   *f = new_owner_tid | WAITERS;
> 
> 				lock_pi(f) 
> 				  lock(hb->lock)
> 				  uval = *f;
> 				  topwaiter = futex_top_waiter();
> 				    attach_to_pi_state(uval, topwaiter->pistate);
> 				      pid = uval & TID_MASK;
> 				      if (pid != task_pid_vnr(pistate->owner))
> 				      	 return -EINVAL;
>   ....
>   pistate->owner = newowner;
> 
> So in this case we tell the caller on CPU 1 that the futex is in
> inconsistent state, because pistate->owner still points to the unlocking
> task while the user space value alread shows the new owner. So this sanity
> check triggers and we simply fail while we should not. It's [10] in the
> state matrix above attach_to_pi_state().

Urgh, yes. I think I can cure that, by taking
pi_state->pi_mutex.wait_lock in attach_to_pi_state(), but blergh.

> I suspect that there are more issues like this, especially since I did not
> look at requeue_pi yet, but by now my brain is completely fried.

Yes, I know about fried brains :-( This stuff has far too many moving
parts. I've been staring at this stuff far too long.


Also, we need better tools to stress this stuff.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-08 16:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-03  9:12 [RFC][PATCH 0/4] FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI wobbles Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-03  9:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/4] futex: Cleanup variable names for futex_top_waiter() Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-03 14:15   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-10-05  3:58   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-03  9:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/4] futex: Use smp_store_release() in mark_wake_futex() Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-03 14:19   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-10-05  3:57   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-05  6:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-03  9:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/4] futex: Remove rt_mutex_deadlock_account_*() Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-03  9:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-03 14:25   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-10-05  1:08   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-05  7:29   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-10-03  9:12 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/4] futex: Rewrite FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-03 15:36   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-10-03 15:44     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-03 15:45     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-03 16:23       ` Steven Rostedt
2016-10-05  7:41   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-10-05  8:09     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-05  8:21       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-10-05  8:32         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-06 10:29   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-07 11:21   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-08 15:53     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-08 16:55       ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-10-08 17:06         ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-10 10:17         ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-10 11:40           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-21 12:27           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-27 20:36             ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-23 19:20               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-24 16:52                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-24 17:56                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-24 18:58                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-25  9:23                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-25 10:03                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-25 19:13                           ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-25 14:09               ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-08 18:22     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-09 11:17     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-10-10 14:06       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-05  1:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/4] FUTEX_UNLOCK_PI wobbles Davidlohr Bueso
2016-10-05  6:20   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-10-05  7:26     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2016-10-05 16:04     ` Davidlohr Bueso

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161008165540.GI3568@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=jdesfossez@efficios.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=xlpang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome