mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:181:6: error: redefinition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table'
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 07:22:35 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <201610280732.WFLV0Ag9%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3908 bytes --]

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head:   e3300ffef0653774f1099cab153d25d24bd773ce
commit: f47b72a15a9679dd4dc1af681d4d2f1ca2815552 PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file
date:   6 months ago
config: xtensa-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: xtensa-linux-gcc (GCC) 4.9.0
reproduce:
        wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        git checkout f47b72a15a9679dd4dc1af681d4d2f1ca2815552
        # save the attached .config to linux build tree
        make.cross ARCH=xtensa 

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:181:6: error: redefinition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table'
    void dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(struct device *dev)
         ^
   In file included from drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h:21:0,
                    from drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:22:
   include/linux/pm_opp.h:217:20: note: previous definition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table' was here
    static inline void dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(struct device *dev)
                       ^
>> drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:428:5: error: redefinition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_add_table'
    int dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(struct device *dev)
        ^
   In file included from drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h:21:0,
                    from drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:22:
   include/linux/pm_opp.h:212:19: note: previous definition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_add_table' was here
    static inline int dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(struct device *dev)
                      ^
>> drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:468:6: error: redefinition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table'
    void dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
         ^
   In file included from drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h:21:0,
                    from drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:22:
   include/linux/pm_opp.h:226:20: note: previous definition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table' was here
    static inline void dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
                       ^
>> drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:486:5: error: redefinition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table'
    int dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
        ^
   In file included from drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h:21:0,
                    from drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:22:
   include/linux/pm_opp.h:221:19: note: previous definition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table' was here
    static inline int dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
                      ^
>> drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:539:5: error: redefinition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus'
    int dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev,
        ^
   In file included from drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h:21:0,
                    from drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:22:
   include/linux/pm_opp.h:230:19: note: previous definition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus' was here
    static inline int dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev, struct cpumask *cpumask)
                      ^

vim +/dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table +181 drivers/base/power/opp/of.c

   175	 * Locking: The internal opp_table and opp structures are RCU protected.
   176	 * Hence this function indirectly uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks
   177	 * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure
   178	 * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where
   179	 * mutex cannot be locked.
   180	 */
 > 181	void dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(struct device *dev)
   182	{
   183		_dev_pm_opp_remove_table(dev, false);
   184	}

---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure                Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all                   Intel Corporation

[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 44915 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2016-10-27 23:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-27 23:22 kbuild test robot [this message]
2016-10-28  3:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-28  4:07   ` Fengguang Wu
2016-10-28  5:05     ` Viresh Kumar
2017-02-12 21:43 kbuild test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=201610280732.WFLV0Ag9%fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®