From: kbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: kbuild-all@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:181:6: error: redefinition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table'
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2017 05:43:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201702130517.KPCVVbmN%fengguang.wu@intel.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4098 bytes --]
Hi Viresh,
FYI, the error/warning still remains.
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head: 7089db84e356562f8ba737c29e472cc42d530dbc
commit: f47b72a15a9679dd4dc1af681d4d2f1ca2815552 PM / OPP: Move CONFIG_OF dependent code in a separate file
date: 9 months ago
config: x86_64-randconfig-x008-201707 (attached as .config)
compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.2.0-3) 6.2.0 20160901
reproduce:
git checkout f47b72a15a9679dd4dc1af681d4d2f1ca2815552
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make ARCH=x86_64
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:181:6: error: redefinition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table'
void dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(struct device *dev)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h:21:0,
from drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:22:
include/linux/pm_opp.h:217:20: note: previous definition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table' was here
static inline void dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(struct device *dev)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:428:5: error: redefinition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_add_table'
int dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(struct device *dev)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h:21:0,
from drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:22:
include/linux/pm_opp.h:212:19: note: previous definition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_add_table' was here
static inline int dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(struct device *dev)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:468:6: error: redefinition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table'
void dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h:21:0,
from drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:22:
include/linux/pm_opp.h:226:20: note: previous definition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table' was here
static inline void dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_remove_table(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:486:5: error: redefinition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table'
int dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h:21:0,
from drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:22:
include/linux/pm_opp.h:221:19: note: previous definition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table' was here
static inline int dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table(const struct cpumask *cpumask)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>> drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:539:5: error: redefinition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus'
int dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev,
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from drivers/base/power/opp/opp.h:21:0,
from drivers/base/power/opp/of.c:22:
include/linux/pm_opp.h:230:19: note: previous definition of 'dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus' was here
static inline int dev_pm_opp_of_get_sharing_cpus(struct device *cpu_dev, struct cpumask *cpumask)
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
vim +/dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table +181 drivers/base/power/opp/of.c
175 * Locking: The internal opp_table and opp structures are RCU protected.
176 * Hence this function indirectly uses RCU updater strategy with mutex locks
177 * to keep the integrity of the internal data structures. Callers should ensure
178 * that this function is *NOT* called under RCU protection or in contexts where
179 * mutex cannot be locked.
180 */
> 181 void dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(struct device *dev)
182 {
183 _dev_pm_opp_remove_table(dev, false);
184 }
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 29562 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2017-02-12 21:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-02-12 21:43 kbuild test robot [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-10-27 23:22 kbuild test robot
2016-10-28 3:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2016-10-28 4:07 ` Fengguang Wu
2016-10-28 5:05 ` Viresh Kumar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201702130517.KPCVVbmN%fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--to=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®