From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] rtc: remove modular usage from non-modular code
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 23:30:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161104223053.luroc2zcwfmppejo@piout.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161031185527.20279-1-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
On 31/10/2016 at 14:55:24 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote :
> My ongoing audit looking for non-modular code that needlessly uses
> modular macros (vs. built-in equivalents) and/or has dead code
> relating to module unloading that can never be executed led to the
> creation of these rtc related commits.
>
> For anyone new to the underlying goal of this cleanup, we are trying to
> not use module support for code that can never be built as a module since:
>
> (1) it is easy to accidentally write unused module_exit and remove code
> (2) it can be misleading when reading the source, thinking it can be
> modular when the Makefile and/or Kconfig prohibit it
> (3) it requires the include of the module.h header file which in turn
> includes nearly everything else, thus adding to CPP overhead.
> (4) it gets copied/replicated into other code and spreads like weeds.
>
> Build tested on current linux-next (sparc32) to ensure no silly typos
> or implicit include issues that would break compilation crept in.
>
> ---
>
> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
> Cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
> Cc: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com
> Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org
>
> Paul Gortmaker (3):
> rtc: make rtc-lib explicitly non-modular
> rtc: sparc: make starfire explicitly non-modular
> rtc: sparc: make sun4v explicitly non-modular
>
> drivers/rtc/rtc-lib.c | 4 +---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-starfire.c | 10 ++++------
> drivers/rtc/rtc-sun4v.c | 10 ++++------
> 3 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
Applied, thanks.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-04 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-31 18:55 Paul Gortmaker
2016-10-31 18:55 ` [PATCH 1/3] rtc: make rtc-lib explicitly non-modular Paul Gortmaker
2016-10-31 18:55 ` [PATCH 2/3] rtc: sparc: make starfire " Paul Gortmaker
2016-11-20 21:29 ` David Miller
2016-11-20 21:38 ` Alexandre Belloni
2016-10-31 18:55 ` [PATCH 3/3] rtc: sparc: make sun4v " Paul Gortmaker
2016-11-20 21:29 ` David Miller
2016-11-04 22:30 ` Alexandre Belloni [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161104223053.luroc2zcwfmppejo@piout.net \
--to=alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®