mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@intel.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <h.peter.anvin@intel.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [kernel-hardening] Re: [RFC v4 PATCH 00/13] HARDENED_ATOMIC
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 13:47:55 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161111124755.GI3117@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161111124126.GG11945@leverpostej>

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:41:27PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 01:29:21AM +0100, Colin Vidal wrote:

> > I wonder if we didn't make a confusion between naming and
> > specifications. I have thought about Kees idea and what you're saying:
> > 
> > - The name "atomic_t" name didn't tell anything about if the variable
> >   can wrap or not. It just tells there is no race condition on
> >   concurrent access, nothing else, and users are well with that. OK
> >   then, we don't modify atomic_t, it makes sense.
> > 
> > - Hence, let's say a new type "refcount_t". It names exactly what we
> >   try to protect in this patch set. A much more simpler interface than
> >   atomic_t would be needed, and it protects on race condition and
> >   overflows (precisely what is expected of a counter reference). Not
> >   an opt-in solution, but it is much less invasive since we "just"
> >   have to modify the kref implementation and some vfs reference
> >   counters.
> > 
> > That didn't tell us how actually implements refcount_t: reuse some
> > atomic_t code or not (it would be simpler anyways, since we don't have
> > to implement the whole atomic_t interface). Still, this is another
> > problem.
> > 
> > Sounds better?
> 
> Regardless of atomic_t semantics, a refcount_t would be far more obvious
> to developers than atomic_t and/or kref, and better documents the intent
> of code using it.
> 
> We'd still see abuse of atomic_t (and so this won't solve the problems
> Kees mentioned), but even as something orthogonal I think that would
> make sense to have.

Furthermore, you could implement that refcount_t stuff using
atomic_cmpxchg() in generic code. While that is sub-optimal for ll/sc
architectures you at least get generic code that works to get started.

Also, I suspect that if your refcounts are heavily contended, you'll
have other problems than the performance of these primitives.

Code for refcount_inc(), refcount_inc_not_zero() and
refcount_sub_and_test() can be copy-pasted from the kref patch I send
yesterday.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-11-11 12:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <1478809488-18303-1-git-send-email-elena.reshetova@intel.com>
2016-11-10 20:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 20:48   ` Will Deacon
2016-11-10 21:01     ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 21:23       ` [kernel-hardening] " David Windsor
2016-11-10 21:27         ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 21:39           ` David Windsor
2016-11-10 21:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 21:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-10 21:23       ` Kees Cook
2016-11-11  4:25         ` [kernel-hardening] " Rik van Riel
2016-11-10 22:27       ` Greg KH
2016-11-10 23:15         ` Kees Cook
2016-11-10 23:38           ` Greg KH
2016-11-10 23:57           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11  0:29             ` Colin Vidal
2016-11-11 12:41               ` Mark Rutland
2016-11-11 12:47                 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-11-11 13:00                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 14:39                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-11-11 14:48                       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-11 23:07                     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-13 11:03             ` Greg KH
2016-11-10 20:56   ` Kees Cook
2016-11-11  3:20     ` [kernel-hardening] " David Windsor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161111124755.GI3117@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=h.peter.anvin@intel.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kernel-hardening@lists.openwall.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome