From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
"dvyukov@google.com" <dvyukov@google.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: perf: fuzzer BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __unwind_start
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 15:54:11 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161128215411.fkis7bbimjy4v4j7@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1611241229180.25241@macbook-air>
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 12:33:48PM -0500, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
> This is on a skylake machine, linus git as of yesterday after the various
> kasan-related fixes went in. Not sure if there were any that hadn't hit
> upstream yet.
>
> Anyway I can't tell from this one what the actual trigger is. After this
> mess the fuzzer process was locked, udev started complaining, and it
> eventually died completely after a few hours of repeated messages like
> this.
>
> [38898.373183] INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
> [38898.378452] 7-...: (5249 ticks this GP) idle=727/140000000000001/0 softirq=3141908/3141908 fqs=2625
> [38898.381211] INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks:
> [38898.381214] 0-...: (1 GPs behind) idle=05f/140000000000001/2 softirq=3285458/3285459 fqs=2625
> [38898.381217] 7-...: (5249 ticks this GP) idle=727/140000000000001/0 softirq=3141908/3141908 fqs=2625
> [38898.381218] (detected by 1, t=5252 jiffies, g=3685053, c=3685052, q=32)
> [38898.381244] ==================================================================
> [38898.381247] BUG: KASAN: stack-out-of-bounds in __unwind_start+0x1a2/0x1c0 at addr ffff8801e9727c28
> [38898.381248] Read of size 8 by task swapper/1/0
> [38898.381250] page:ffffea0007a5c9c0 count:0 mapcount:0 mapping: (null) index:0x0
> [38898.381251] flags: 0x2ffff8000000000()
> [38898.381251] page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected
> [38898.381328] Memory state around the buggy address:
> [38898.381330] ffff8801e9727b00: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> [38898.381331] ffff8801e9727b80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> [38898.381332] >ffff8801e9727c00: 00 00 00 00 f1 f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 00 f3 f3 f3 f3
> [38898.381333] ^
> [38898.381334] ffff8801e9727c80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 f1
> [38898.381335] ffff8801e9727d00: f1 f1 f1 00 00 00 f4 f2 f2 f2 f2 00 00 00 00 f3
> [38898.381335] ==================================================================
> [38898.510702] (t=5284 jiffies g=3685053 c=3685052 q=32)
>
> (That's all, the report above repeats but no useful things like a
> backtrace are ever printed)
After looking at the RCU stall detection code, I think the KASAN error
and missing stack dump aren't very surprising. RCU calls the scheduler
dump_cpu_task() function, which seems inherently problematic: it tries
to dump the stack of a task while it's running on another CPU.
There are some issues with that:
1) There's no way to find the starting frame of a currently running task
from another CPU.
In fact, I'm wondering how dump_cpu_task() ever worked at all? It
seems like you'd have to get lucky that the sp/bp registers stored by
the last call to schedule() happen to point to a currently valid
stack frame.
2) Even if there were a way to find the starting frame, it's racy
because the target task could be overwriting the stack while we're
reading it.
3) IRQ/exception stack dumps would be missing anyway because the stack
dump code only looks at the current CPU's interrupt stacks.
Maybe dump_cpu_task() should instead run the stack dump directly from
the target CPU, e.g. with trigger_single_cpu_backtrace() or
smp_call_function_single()?
Paul, Peter, Ingo, any thoughts?
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-28 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-24 17:33 Vince Weaver
2016-11-28 21:54 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2016-11-29 0:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-29 5:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-11-29 9:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-29 14:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-29 15:09 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-11-29 16:12 ` Petr Mladek
2016-11-29 18:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-29 16:51 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-29 17:17 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-11-29 17:36 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-30 9:29 ` Petr Mladek
2016-11-29 10:28 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-29 12:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-29 15:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-29 16:29 ` Petr Mladek
2016-11-29 17:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-29 19:39 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-29 19:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-11-29 20:07 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-29 20:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-30 19:13 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2016-11-30 19:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-12-01 5:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-01 12:33 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-12-01 16:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-01 17:00 ` Paul E. McKenney
2016-11-30 10:01 ` Petr Mladek
2016-11-30 11:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20161128215411.fkis7bbimjy4v4j7@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vincent.weaver@maine.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome