mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Stable tree <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] doc: change the way how the stable backport is requested
Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2016 15:14:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161205141451.GK30758@dhcp22.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20161205135824.GA30013@kroah.com>

On Mon 05-12-16 14:58:24, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 02:05:08PM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 05-12-16 13:52:36, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2016 at 08:21:54AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > > From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Currently if a patch should aim a stable tree backport one should add
> > > > 
> > > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # $version
> > > > 
> > > > to the s-o-b block. This has two major disadvantages a) it spams the
> > > > stable mailing list with patches which are just discussed and not merged
> > > > yet
> > > 
> > > That's not a problem in that I know I like to see them to give me a
> > > "heads up" that something is coming down the pipeline soon.
> > 
> > Are you really tracking all those discussion to catch resulting patches
> > in the Linus' tree? I simply fail to see a point having N versions of
> > the patch on the stable mailing list before it gets picked up from the
> > _Linus'_ anyayw.
> 
> I do scan them, sometimes I even find problems with them (like a zram
> "fix" that went by this weekend.)  So yes, it is always good to have
> more reviewers on patches, don't you think?

Yes I do agree that more review is better. But then the stable mailing
list is a complete failure in that resopect - at least for me. Why?
Simply because it doesn't contain discussion for the stable inclusion
but rather something that eventually might happen to become stable
material. This what I call noise and the reason why I've stopped
following the stable ML.

> > > I don't think anyone has ever complained of this before, do you?
> > 
> > This is the reason I have stopped following the stable mailing list.
> > The noise level is just too high.
> 
> What "noise"?  It's all patches that are being addressed to the stable
> kernels, how is that off-topic?  What do you expect to be posted to this
> list?

Patches which are final and target the stable tree. I do not have to see
N versions of patchesets which evolve in the time just to see that
something completely different has been merged to the Linus tree. 

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

  reply	other threads:[~2016-12-05 14:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-05  7:21 Michal Hocko
2016-12-05 12:52 ` Greg KH
2016-12-05 13:05   ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-05 13:15     ` Willy Tarreau
2016-12-05 13:24       ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-05 13:30         ` Willy Tarreau
2016-12-05 13:58     ` Greg KH
2016-12-05 14:14       ` Michal Hocko [this message]
2016-12-05 14:21         ` Greg KH
2016-12-05 14:39           ` Michal Hocko
2016-12-05 14:43             ` Greg KH
2016-12-05 14:56               ` Michal Hocko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161205141451.GK30758@dhcp22.suse.cz \
    --to=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=w@1wt.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®