mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Nicolai Hähnle" <nhaehnle@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	"Nicolai Hähnle" <Nicolai.Haehnle@amd.com>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Maarten Lankhorst" <dev@mblankhorst.nl>,
	"Daniel Vetter" <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
	"Chris Wilson" <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] locking/ww_mutex: Set use_ww_ctx even when locking without a context
Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2016 16:25:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20161206152537.GV3045@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1480601214-26583-5-git-send-email-nhaehnle@gmail.com>

On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 03:06:47PM +0100, Nicolai Hähnle wrote:

> @@ -640,10 +640,11 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
>  	struct mutex_waiter waiter;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	bool first = false;
> -	struct ww_mutex *ww;
>  	int ret;
>  
> -	if (use_ww_ctx) {
> +	if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) {
> +		struct ww_mutex *ww;
> +
>  		ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
>  		if (unlikely(ww_ctx == READ_ONCE(ww->ctx)))
>  			return -EALREADY;

So I don't see the point of removing *ww from the function scope, we can
still compute that container_of() even if !ww_ctx, right? That would
safe a ton of churn below, adding all those struct ww_mutex declarations
and container_of() casts.

(and note that the container_of() is a fancy NO-OP because base is the
first member).

> @@ -656,8 +657,12 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
>  	    mutex_optimistic_spin(lock, ww_ctx, use_ww_ctx, false)) {
>  		/* got the lock, yay! */
>  		lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, ip);
> -		if (use_ww_ctx)
> +		if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) {
> +			struct ww_mutex *ww;
> +
> +			ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
>  			ww_mutex_set_context_fastpath(ww, ww_ctx);
> +		}
>  		preempt_enable();
>  		return 0;
>  	}
> @@ -702,7 +707,7 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
>  			goto err;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx->acquired > 0) {
> +		if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx && ww_ctx->acquired > 0) {
>  			ret = __ww_mutex_lock_check_stamp(lock, ww_ctx);
>  			if (ret)
>  				goto err;
> @@ -742,8 +747,12 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
>  	/* got the lock - cleanup and rejoice! */
>  	lock_acquired(&lock->dep_map, ip);
>  
> -	if (use_ww_ctx)
> +	if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx) {
> +		struct ww_mutex *ww;
> +
> +		ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
>  		ww_mutex_set_context_slowpath(ww, ww_ctx);
> +	}
>  
>  	spin_unlock_mutex(&lock->wait_lock, flags);
>  	preempt_enable();

All that then reverts to:

-	if (use_ww_ctx)
+	if (use_ww_ctx && ww_ctx)

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-12-06 15:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-12-01 14:06 [PATCH v2 00/11] locking/ww_mutex: Keep sorted wait list to avoid stampedes Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-01 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] drm/vgem: Use ww_mutex_(un)lock even with a NULL context Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-01 14:18   ` Chris Wilson
2016-12-01 15:14     ` Daniel Vetter
2016-12-01 16:24   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-01 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] locking/ww_mutex: Re-check ww->ctx in the inner optimistic spin loop Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-01 14:36   ` Chris Wilson
2016-12-06 15:06   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-06 16:03     ` Waiman Long
2016-12-06 18:29       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-06 18:46         ` Waiman Long
2016-12-01 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] locking/ww_mutex: Extract stamp comparison to __ww_mutex_stamp_after Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-01 14:42   ` Chris Wilson
2016-12-01 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] locking/ww_mutex: Set use_ww_ctx even when locking without a context Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-06 15:14   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-06 15:25   ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-12-16 13:17     ` Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-17  7:53       ` Maarten Lankhorst
2016-12-17 13:49       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-01 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] locking/ww_mutex: Add waiters in stamp order Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-01 15:59   ` Chris Wilson
2016-12-16 14:21     ` Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-06 15:36   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-16 13:34     ` Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-06 16:55   ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-16 14:19     ` Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-16 14:46       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-16 17:15       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-16 18:11         ` Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-16 20:00           ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-16 22:35             ` Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-16 17:20       ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-12-16 18:12         ` Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-01 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] locking/ww_mutex: Notify waiters that have to back off while adding tasks to wait list Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-01 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] locking/ww_mutex: Wake at most one waiter for back off when acquiring the lock Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-01 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] locking/ww_mutex: Yield to other waiters from optimistic spin Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-01 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] locking/mutex: Initialize mutex_waiter::ww_ctx with poison when debugging Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-01 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] Documentation/locking/ww_mutex: Update the design document Nicolai Hähnle
2016-12-01 14:06 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] [rfc] locking/ww_mutex: Always spin optimistically for the first waiter Nicolai Hähnle

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20161206152537.GV3045@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=Nicolai.Haehnle@amd.com \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=dev@mblankhorst.nl \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nhaehnle@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome