mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: __mutex_lock_common() unlikely very likely
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:32:52 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170119083252.6cbb0c8d@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170119085507.GA28607@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>

On Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:55:07 +0000
Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 03:58:24PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > Chris,
> > 
> > My branch tracer flagged the unlikely in __mutex_lock_common() as
> > always hit. That's the:
> > 
> > 	if (use_ww_ctx) {
> > 		[...]
> > 		if (unlikely(ww_ctx == READ_ONCE(ww->ctx)))
> > 			return -EALREADY;
> > 	}
> > 
> > This is hit 100% of the time, and its coming from the drm logic:  
> 
> By design this is an exceptional case. In practice, drm modesetting is a
> little slapsidasical when it comes to locking. However, it is the
> minority use case, just that on intel, the more prevalent users do not
> hit this path - though they will with the ww_mutex refactoring work. ttm
> drivers (amdgpu, nouveau etc) will be demonstrating that this is the
> unlikely branch.
>

Then I suggest that we remove the unlikely, as it's only "unlikely" if
you have the right hardware. If you don't (and I appear to have three
boxes that don't) then it becomes very likely.

"unlikely" is not about how likely you have the right hardware. It's
about high likely the logic is. If it's a hardware issue, it shouldn't
have a likely or unlikely attached to it.

I'll send a patch to nuke it. When drm is no longer a special case,
because it's a popular platform, we can add it back.

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-19 13:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-18 20:58 Steven Rostedt
2017-01-19  8:55 ` Chris Wilson
2017-01-19 13:32   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2017-01-19 13:54   ` [PATCH] mutex: Remove ww_ctx unlikely() from __mutex_lock_common() Steven Rostedt (VMware)
2017-01-19 16:42     ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-19 16:50       ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170119083252.6cbb0c8d@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®