mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH] mutex: Remove ww_ctx unlikely() from __mutex_lock_common()
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2017 08:54:41 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170119085441.09168f48@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170119085507.GA28607@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>


The unikely() used in __mutex_lock_common() when use_ww_ctx is set is
currently dependent on the hardware if it is likely or unlikely. The
intel drm code calls into this function and triggers this branch 100%
of the time. As this hardware is very commonly used, this is not a rare
case at all (the three boxes I tested this on, all triggered it).

The likely/unlikely annotation should be used for logical cases that
cause it to mostly be hit or not, to let gcc optimize for a certain
case. If hardware causes it to be the opposite, then the hint is
punishing some hardware over other hardware, and no hint should be
placed at all.

I added a comment stating that the branch should be unlikely, but due
to the intel drm logic, it currently isn't. Then if drm changes in the
future, we could then try it again.

Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
diff --git a/kernel/locking/mutex.c b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
index a70b90d..577bb74 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -513,7 +513,11 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock, long state, unsigned int subclass,
 
 	if (use_ww_ctx) {
 		struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
-		if (unlikely(ww_ctx == READ_ONCE(ww->ctx)))
+		/*
+		 * This really should be an unlikely() but currently
+		 * the intel drm makes this a very likely case.
+		 */
+		if (ww_ctx == READ_ONCE(ww->ctx))
 			return -EALREADY;
 	}
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-19 14:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-18 20:58 __mutex_lock_common() unlikely very likely Steven Rostedt
2017-01-19  8:55 ` Chris Wilson
2017-01-19 13:32   ` Steven Rostedt
2017-01-19 13:54   ` Steven Rostedt (VMware) [this message]
2017-01-19 16:42     ` [PATCH] mutex: Remove ww_ctx unlikely() from __mutex_lock_common() Peter Zijlstra
2017-01-19 16:50       ` Steven Rostedt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170119085441.09168f48@gandalf.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®