* [PATCH v2 0/2] sched/loadavg: Fix loadavg spikes and sprinkle {READ,WRITE}_ONCE()
@ 2017-02-17 12:07 Matt Fleming
2017-02-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO_HZ accounting Matt Fleming
2017-02-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/loadavg: Use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() for sample window Matt Fleming
0 siblings, 2 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Matt Fleming @ 2017-02-17 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Frederic Weisbecker
Cc: linux-kernel, Matt Fleming
Peter, Frederic,
Here's a v2 of the patch series to fix the loadavg spikes I'm seeing
on a v3.12 based kernel, caused by delaying load sampling if a sample
period was crossed while in NO_HZ idle.
I tried to make the changelog for PATCH 1 clearer this time around by
incorporating suggestions from both of you. Please let me know if it's
still unclear.
PATCH 2 addresses Peter's comment:
"Irrespective the above though; should we not make this:
+ this_rq->calc_load_update = READ_ONCE(calc_load_update);
because if for some reason we do a double load of calc_load_update and
see two different values, weird stuff could happen.
And because, on general principle, a READ_ONCE() should be paired with a
WRITE_ONCE(), that should be done too I suppose."
The v1 of the patch can be found here:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170208132924.3038-1-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk
Matt Fleming (2):
sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO_HZ accounting
sched/loadavg: Use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() for sample window
kernel/sched/loadavg.c | 20 ++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--
2.10.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO_HZ accounting 2017-02-17 12:07 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched/loadavg: Fix loadavg spikes and sprinkle {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() Matt Fleming @ 2017-02-17 12:07 ` Matt Fleming 2017-02-22 15:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker ` (2 more replies) 2017-02-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/loadavg: Use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() for sample window Matt Fleming 1 sibling, 3 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Matt Fleming @ 2017-02-17 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Frederic Weisbecker Cc: linux-kernel, Matt Fleming, Mike Galbraith, Morten Rasmussen, stable, Vincent Guittot If we crossed a sample window while in NO_HZ we will add LOAD_FREQ to the pending sample window time on exit, setting the next update not one window into the future, but two. This situation on exiting NO_HZ is described by: this_rq->calc_load_update < jiffies < calc_load_update In this scenario, what we should be doing is: this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update [ next window ] But what we actually do is: this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update + LOAD_FREQ [ next+1 window ] This has the effect of delaying load average updates for potentially up to ~9seconds. This can result in huge spikes in the load average values due to per-cpu uninterruptible task counts being out of sync when accumulated across all CPUs. It's safe to update the per-cpu active count if we wake between sample windows because any load that we left in 'calc_load_idle' will have been zero'd when the idle load was folded in calc_global_load(). This issue is easy to reproduce before, commit 9d89c257dfb9 ("sched/fair: Rewrite runnable load and utilization average tracking") just by forking short-lived process pipelines built from ps(1) and grep(1) in a loop. I'm unable to reproduce the spikes after that commit, but the bug still seems to be present from code review. Fixes: commit 5167e8d ("sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation -- again") Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.5+ Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> --- kernel/sched/loadavg.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Changes in v2: - Folded in Peter's suggestion for how to fix this. - Tried to clairfy the changelog based on feedback from Peter and Frederic diff --git a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c index a2d6eb71f06b..ec91fcc09bfe 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c +++ b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c @@ -201,8 +201,9 @@ void calc_load_exit_idle(void) struct rq *this_rq = this_rq(); /* - * If we're still before the sample window, we're done. + * If we're still before the pending sample window, we're done. */ + this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update; if (time_before(jiffies, this_rq->calc_load_update)) return; @@ -211,7 +212,6 @@ void calc_load_exit_idle(void) * accounted through the nohz accounting, so skip the entire deal and * sync up for the next window. */ - this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update; if (time_before(jiffies, this_rq->calc_load_update + 10)) this_rq->calc_load_update += LOAD_FREQ; } -- 2.10.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO_HZ accounting 2017-02-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO_HZ accounting Matt Fleming @ 2017-02-22 15:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2017-03-08 8:47 ` Wanpeng Li 2017-03-16 11:13 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Matt Fleming 2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Frederic Weisbecker @ 2017-02-22 15:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matt Fleming Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, linux-kernel, Mike Galbraith, Morten Rasmussen, stable, Vincent Guittot On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 12:07:30PM +0000, Matt Fleming wrote: > If we crossed a sample window while in NO_HZ we will add LOAD_FREQ to > the pending sample window time on exit, setting the next update not > one window into the future, but two. > > This situation on exiting NO_HZ is described by: > > this_rq->calc_load_update < jiffies < calc_load_update > > In this scenario, what we should be doing is: > > this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update [ next window ] > > But what we actually do is: > > this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update + LOAD_FREQ [ next+1 window ] > > This has the effect of delaying load average updates for potentially > up to ~9seconds. > > This can result in huge spikes in the load average values due to > per-cpu uninterruptible task counts being out of sync when accumulated > across all CPUs. > > It's safe to update the per-cpu active count if we wake between sample > windows because any load that we left in 'calc_load_idle' will have > been zero'd when the idle load was folded in calc_global_load(). > > This issue is easy to reproduce before, > > commit 9d89c257dfb9 ("sched/fair: Rewrite runnable load and utilization average tracking") > > just by forking short-lived process pipelines built from ps(1) and > grep(1) in a loop. I'm unable to reproduce the spikes after that > commit, but the bug still seems to be present from code review. > > Fixes: commit 5167e8d ("sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation -- again") > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> > Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> > Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Acked-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Thanks it's much clearer now! ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO_HZ accounting 2017-02-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO_HZ accounting Matt Fleming 2017-02-22 15:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker @ 2017-03-08 8:47 ` Wanpeng Li 2017-03-16 11:13 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Matt Fleming 2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Wanpeng Li @ 2017-03-08 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Matt Fleming Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Frederic Weisbecker, linux-kernel, Mike Galbraith, Morten Rasmussen, stable, Vincent Guittot 2017-02-17 20:07 GMT+08:00 Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>: > If we crossed a sample window while in NO_HZ we will add LOAD_FREQ to > the pending sample window time on exit, setting the next update not > one window into the future, but two. > > This situation on exiting NO_HZ is described by: > > this_rq->calc_load_update < jiffies < calc_load_update > > In this scenario, what we should be doing is: > > this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update [ next window ] > > But what we actually do is: > > this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update + LOAD_FREQ [ next+1 window ] > > This has the effect of delaying load average updates for potentially > up to ~9seconds. > > This can result in huge spikes in the load average values due to > per-cpu uninterruptible task counts being out of sync when accumulated > across all CPUs. > > It's safe to update the per-cpu active count if we wake between sample > windows because any load that we left in 'calc_load_idle' will have > been zero'd when the idle load was folded in calc_global_load(). > > This issue is easy to reproduce before, > > commit 9d89c257dfb9 ("sched/fair: Rewrite runnable load and utilization average tracking") > > just by forking short-lived process pipelines built from ps(1) and > grep(1) in a loop. I'm unable to reproduce the spikes after that > commit, but the bug still seems to be present from code review. > > Fixes: commit 5167e8d ("sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation -- again") > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> > Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> > Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> > Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> > Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v3.5+ > Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> > --- > kernel/sched/loadavg.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > Changes in v2: > > - Folded in Peter's suggestion for how to fix this. > > - Tried to clairfy the changelog based on feedback from Peter and > Frederic > > diff --git a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c > index a2d6eb71f06b..ec91fcc09bfe 100644 > --- a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c > +++ b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c > @@ -201,8 +201,9 @@ void calc_load_exit_idle(void) > struct rq *this_rq = this_rq(); > > /* > - * If we're still before the sample window, we're done. > + * If we're still before the pending sample window, we're done. > */ > + this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update; > if (time_before(jiffies, this_rq->calc_load_update)) > return; > > @@ -211,7 +212,6 @@ void calc_load_exit_idle(void) > * accounted through the nohz accounting, so skip the entire deal and > * sync up for the next window. > */ > - this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update; > if (time_before(jiffies, this_rq->calc_load_update + 10)) > this_rq->calc_load_update += LOAD_FREQ; > } > -- > 2.10.0 > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [tip:sched/core] sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO_HZ accounting 2017-02-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO_HZ accounting Matt Fleming 2017-02-22 15:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker 2017-03-08 8:47 ` Wanpeng Li @ 2017-03-16 11:13 ` tip-bot for Matt Fleming 2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: tip-bot for Matt Fleming @ 2017-03-16 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-tip-commits Cc: umgwanakikbuti, morten.rasmussen, hpa, peterz, vincent.guittot, tglx, matt, linux-kernel, fweisbec, mingo, efault, torvalds Commit-ID: 6e5f32f7a43f45ee55c401c0b9585eb01f9629a8 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/6e5f32f7a43f45ee55c401c0b9585eb01f9629a8 Author: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> AuthorDate: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 12:07:30 +0000 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> CommitDate: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:21:00 +0100 sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO_HZ accounting If we crossed a sample window while in NO_HZ we will add LOAD_FREQ to the pending sample window time on exit, setting the next update not one window into the future, but two. This situation on exiting NO_HZ is described by: this_rq->calc_load_update < jiffies < calc_load_update In this scenario, what we should be doing is: this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update [ next window ] But what we actually do is: this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update + LOAD_FREQ [ next+1 window ] This has the effect of delaying load average updates for potentially up to ~9seconds. This can result in huge spikes in the load average values due to per-cpu uninterruptible task counts being out of sync when accumulated across all CPUs. It's safe to update the per-cpu active count if we wake between sample windows because any load that we left in 'calc_load_idle' will have been zero'd when the idle load was folded in calc_global_load(). This issue is easy to reproduce before, commit 9d89c257dfb9 ("sched/fair: Rewrite runnable load and utilization average tracking") just by forking short-lived process pipelines built from ps(1) and grep(1) in a loop. I'm unable to reproduce the spikes after that commit, but the bug still seems to be present from code review. Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Fixes: commit 5167e8d ("sched/nohz: Rewrite and fix load-avg computation -- again") Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170217120731.11868-2-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/loadavg.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c index 7296b73..3a55f3f 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c +++ b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c @@ -202,8 +202,9 @@ void calc_load_exit_idle(void) struct rq *this_rq = this_rq(); /* - * If we're still before the sample window, we're done. + * If we're still before the pending sample window, we're done. */ + this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update; if (time_before(jiffies, this_rq->calc_load_update)) return; @@ -212,7 +213,6 @@ void calc_load_exit_idle(void) * accounted through the nohz accounting, so skip the entire deal and * sync up for the next window. */ - this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update; if (time_before(jiffies, this_rq->calc_load_update + 10)) this_rq->calc_load_update += LOAD_FREQ; } ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/loadavg: Use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() for sample window 2017-02-17 12:07 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched/loadavg: Fix loadavg spikes and sprinkle {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() Matt Fleming 2017-02-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO_HZ accounting Matt Fleming @ 2017-02-17 12:07 ` Matt Fleming 2017-03-16 11:13 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Matt Fleming 1 sibling, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Matt Fleming @ 2017-02-17 12:07 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Frederic Weisbecker Cc: linux-kernel, Matt Fleming, Mike Galbraith, Morten Rasmussen, Vincent Guittot 'calc_load_update' is accessed without any kind of locking and there's a clear assumption in the code that only a single value is read or written. Make this explicit by using READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE(), and avoid unintentionally seeing multiple values, or having the load/stores split. Technically the loads in calc_global_*() don't require this since those are the only functions that update 'calc_load_update', but I've added the READ_ONCE() for consistency. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> --- kernel/sched/loadavg.c | 18 +++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c index ec91fcc09bfe..3f96a7d014ce 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c +++ b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static inline int calc_load_write_idx(void) * If the folding window started, make sure we start writing in the * next idle-delta. */ - if (!time_before(jiffies, calc_load_update)) + if (!time_before(jiffies, READ_ONCE(calc_load_update))) idx++; return idx & 1; @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ void calc_load_exit_idle(void) /* * If we're still before the pending sample window, we're done. */ - this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update; + this_rq->calc_load_update = READ_ONCE(calc_load_update); if (time_before(jiffies, this_rq->calc_load_update)) return; @@ -307,13 +307,15 @@ calc_load_n(unsigned long load, unsigned long exp, */ static void calc_global_nohz(void) { + unsigned long sample_window; long delta, active, n; - if (!time_before(jiffies, calc_load_update + 10)) { + sample_window = READ_ONCE(calc_load_update); + if (!time_before(jiffies, sample_window + 10)) { /* * Catch-up, fold however many we are behind still */ - delta = jiffies - calc_load_update - 10; + delta = jiffies - sample_window - 10; n = 1 + (delta / LOAD_FREQ); active = atomic_long_read(&calc_load_tasks); @@ -323,7 +325,7 @@ static void calc_global_nohz(void) avenrun[1] = calc_load_n(avenrun[1], EXP_5, active, n); avenrun[2] = calc_load_n(avenrun[2], EXP_15, active, n); - calc_load_update += n * LOAD_FREQ; + WRITE_ONCE(calc_load_update, sample_window + n * LOAD_FREQ); } /* @@ -351,9 +353,11 @@ static inline void calc_global_nohz(void) { } */ void calc_global_load(unsigned long ticks) { + unsigned long sample_window; long active, delta; - if (time_before(jiffies, calc_load_update + 10)) + sample_window = READ_ONCE(calc_load_update); + if (time_before(jiffies, sample_window + 10)) return; /* @@ -370,7 +374,7 @@ void calc_global_load(unsigned long ticks) avenrun[1] = calc_load(avenrun[1], EXP_5, active); avenrun[2] = calc_load(avenrun[2], EXP_15, active); - calc_load_update += LOAD_FREQ; + WRITE_ONCE(calc_load_update, sample_window + LOAD_FREQ); /* * In case we idled for multiple LOAD_FREQ intervals, catch up in bulk. -- 2.10.0 ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* [tip:sched/core] sched/loadavg: Use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() for sample window 2017-02-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/loadavg: Use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() for sample window Matt Fleming @ 2017-03-16 11:13 ` tip-bot for Matt Fleming 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: tip-bot for Matt Fleming @ 2017-03-16 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-tip-commits Cc: tglx, fweisbec, torvalds, linux-kernel, hpa, morten.rasmussen, umgwanakikbuti, vincent.guittot, efault, mingo, matt, peterz Commit-ID: caeb5882979bc6f3c8766fcf59c6269b38f521bc Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/caeb5882979bc6f3c8766fcf59c6269b38f521bc Author: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> AuthorDate: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 12:07:31 +0000 Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> CommitDate: Thu, 16 Mar 2017 09:21:01 +0100 sched/loadavg: Use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() for sample window 'calc_load_update' is accessed without any kind of locking and there's a clear assumption in the code that only a single value is read or written. Make this explicit by using READ_ONCE() and WRITE_ONCE(), and avoid unintentionally seeing multiple values, or having the load/stores split. Technically the loads in calc_global_*() don't require this since those are the only functions that update 'calc_load_update', but I've added the READ_ONCE() for consistency. Suggested-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Mike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de> Cc: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com> Cc: Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170217120731.11868-3-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> --- kernel/sched/loadavg.c | 18 +++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c index 3a55f3f..f15fb2b 100644 --- a/kernel/sched/loadavg.c +++ b/kernel/sched/loadavg.c @@ -169,7 +169,7 @@ static inline int calc_load_write_idx(void) * If the folding window started, make sure we start writing in the * next idle-delta. */ - if (!time_before(jiffies, calc_load_update)) + if (!time_before(jiffies, READ_ONCE(calc_load_update))) idx++; return idx & 1; @@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ void calc_load_exit_idle(void) /* * If we're still before the pending sample window, we're done. */ - this_rq->calc_load_update = calc_load_update; + this_rq->calc_load_update = READ_ONCE(calc_load_update); if (time_before(jiffies, this_rq->calc_load_update)) return; @@ -308,13 +308,15 @@ calc_load_n(unsigned long load, unsigned long exp, */ static void calc_global_nohz(void) { + unsigned long sample_window; long delta, active, n; - if (!time_before(jiffies, calc_load_update + 10)) { + sample_window = READ_ONCE(calc_load_update); + if (!time_before(jiffies, sample_window + 10)) { /* * Catch-up, fold however many we are behind still */ - delta = jiffies - calc_load_update - 10; + delta = jiffies - sample_window - 10; n = 1 + (delta / LOAD_FREQ); active = atomic_long_read(&calc_load_tasks); @@ -324,7 +326,7 @@ static void calc_global_nohz(void) avenrun[1] = calc_load_n(avenrun[1], EXP_5, active, n); avenrun[2] = calc_load_n(avenrun[2], EXP_15, active, n); - calc_load_update += n * LOAD_FREQ; + WRITE_ONCE(calc_load_update, sample_window + n * LOAD_FREQ); } /* @@ -352,9 +354,11 @@ static inline void calc_global_nohz(void) { } */ void calc_global_load(unsigned long ticks) { + unsigned long sample_window; long active, delta; - if (time_before(jiffies, calc_load_update + 10)) + sample_window = READ_ONCE(calc_load_update); + if (time_before(jiffies, sample_window + 10)) return; /* @@ -371,7 +375,7 @@ void calc_global_load(unsigned long ticks) avenrun[1] = calc_load(avenrun[1], EXP_5, active); avenrun[2] = calc_load(avenrun[2], EXP_15, active); - calc_load_update += LOAD_FREQ; + WRITE_ONCE(calc_load_update, sample_window + LOAD_FREQ); /* * In case we idled for multiple LOAD_FREQ intervals, catch up in bulk. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-16 11:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-02-17 12:07 [PATCH v2 0/2] sched/loadavg: Fix loadavg spikes and sprinkle {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() Matt Fleming
2017-02-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/loadavg: Avoid loadavg spikes caused by delayed NO_HZ accounting Matt Fleming
2017-02-22 15:18 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2017-03-08 8:47 ` Wanpeng Li
2017-03-16 11:13 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Matt Fleming
2017-02-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/loadavg: Use {READ,WRITE}_ONCE() for sample window Matt Fleming
2017-03-16 11:13 ` [tip:sched/core] " tip-bot for Matt Fleming
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®