* perf: massive perf_event slowdown between 4.9 and 4.11-rc
@ 2017-03-16 15:54 Vince Weaver
2017-03-16 17:57 ` Vince Weaver
2017-03-16 18:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vince Weaver @ 2017-03-16 15:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
Hello
My student actually noticed this before I did, I was hoping it was some
sort of error in her data.
Anyway all perf_event functionality (especially reads) has become about
20x slower, at least on Intel machines (haswell and skylake are the only
ones I've tested) sometime between 4.9 and 4.11-rc
For example, in the PAPI tests:
4.11-rc2
Total cost for PAPI_read (2 counters) over 1000000 iterations
min cycles : 15192
max cycles : 3887735
mean cycles : 15662.057418
std deviation: 19079.398693
4.9
Total cost for PAPI_read (2 counters) over 1000000 iterations
min cycles : 864
max cycles : 78459
mean cycles : 908.010315
std deviation: 144.875697
The perf_event_test validation tests are also showing this, even when
using rdpmc() rather than read.
Is there a likely change that might have caused this? Hoping to avoid
bisecting it as that will kill the rest of the week probably.
Vince
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: perf: massive perf_event slowdown between 4.9 and 4.11-rc
2017-03-16 15:54 perf: massive perf_event slowdown between 4.9 and 4.11-rc Vince Weaver
@ 2017-03-16 17:57 ` Vince Weaver
2017-03-16 18:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 18:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Vince Weaver @ 2017-03-16 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vince Weaver
Cc: linux-kernel, Peter Zijlstra, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Vince Weaver wrote:
> Anyway all perf_event functionality (especially reads) has become about
> 20x slower, at least on Intel machines (haswell and skylake are the only
> ones I've tested) sometime between 4.9 and 4.11-rc
False alarm, I forgot I had debugging (KASAN, etc) turned on in this
kernel tree because I had been fuzzing.
sorry about that.
Vince
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: perf: massive perf_event slowdown between 4.9 and 4.11-rc
2017-03-16 15:54 perf: massive perf_event slowdown between 4.9 and 4.11-rc Vince Weaver
2017-03-16 17:57 ` Vince Weaver
@ 2017-03-16 18:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2017-03-16 18:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vince Weaver; +Cc: linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 11:54:58AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> Hello
>
> My student actually noticed this before I did, I was hoping it was some
> sort of error in her data.
>
> Anyway all perf_event functionality (especially reads) has become about
> 20x slower, at least on Intel machines (haswell and skylake are the only
> ones I've tested) sometime between 4.9 and 4.11-rc
>
> For example, in the PAPI tests:
>
> 4.11-rc2
>
> Total cost for PAPI_read (2 counters) over 1000000 iterations
> min cycles : 15192
> max cycles : 3887735
> mean cycles : 15662.057418
> std deviation: 19079.398693
>
>
> 4.9
>
> Total cost for PAPI_read (2 counters) over 1000000 iterations
> min cycles : 864
> max cycles : 78459
> mean cycles : 908.010315
> std deviation: 144.875697
>
>
> The perf_event_test validation tests are also showing this, even when
> using rdpmc() rather than read.
>
> Is there a likely change that might have caused this? Hoping to avoid
> bisecting it as that will kill the rest of the week probably.
No immediate clue; but I can have a poke. Do you have a handy way of
showing this using: perf test rdpmc, or should I hack something
together?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: perf: massive perf_event slowdown between 4.9 and 4.11-rc
2017-03-16 17:57 ` Vince Weaver
@ 2017-03-16 18:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Peter Zijlstra @ 2017-03-16 18:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Vince Weaver; +Cc: linux-kernel, Ingo Molnar, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 01:57:31PM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2017, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
> > Anyway all perf_event functionality (especially reads) has become about
> > 20x slower, at least on Intel machines (haswell and skylake are the only
> > ones I've tested) sometime between 4.9 and 4.11-rc
>
> False alarm, I forgot I had debugging (KASAN, etc) turned on in this
> kernel tree because I had been fuzzing.
>
> sorry about that.
Ha! no problem.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-03-16 18:49 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2017-03-16 15:54 perf: massive perf_event slowdown between 4.9 and 4.11-rc Vince Weaver
2017-03-16 17:57 ` Vince Weaver
2017-03-16 18:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-03-16 18:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®