* [PATCH 1/5] notify: Call mutex_destroy() before freeing mutex memory
2017-03-24 21:36 [PATCH 0/5] inofify: Reduce lock contention on read() Jes Sorensen
@ 2017-03-24 21:36 ` Jes Sorensen
2017-03-24 21:36 ` [PATCH 2/5] inotify: Use mutex to prevent threaded clients reading events out of order Jes Sorensen
` (3 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jes Sorensen @ 2017-03-24 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: john, rlove, eparis, josef, kernel-team, Jes Sorensen
The conversion of notify from using a spinlock to a mutex missed
adding the call mutex_destroy().
Fixes: 986ab09 ("fsnotify: use a mutex instead of a spinlock to protect a groups mark list")
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
---
fs/notify/group.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/fs/notify/group.c b/fs/notify/group.c
index fbe3cbe..d231be3 100644
--- a/fs/notify/group.c
+++ b/fs/notify/group.c
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ static void fsnotify_final_destroy_group(struct fsnotify_group *group)
if (group->ops->free_group_priv)
group->ops->free_group_priv(group);
+ mutex_destroy(&group->mark_mutex);
kfree(group);
}
--
2.9.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH 2/5] inotify: Use mutex to prevent threaded clients reading events out of order
2017-03-24 21:36 [PATCH 0/5] inofify: Reduce lock contention on read() Jes Sorensen
2017-03-24 21:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] notify: Call mutex_destroy() before freeing mutex memory Jes Sorensen
@ 2017-03-24 21:36 ` Jes Sorensen
2017-03-24 21:36 ` [PATCH 3/5] notify: Split up some fsnotify functions Jes Sorensen
` (2 subsequent siblings)
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jes Sorensen @ 2017-03-24 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: john, rlove, eparis, josef, kernel-team, Jes Sorensen
Introduces mutex in the read() path to prevent a threaded client reading
from the same fd consuming events out of order.
This will matter when avoiding taking the spinlock when consuming each
event in the read() path.
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
---
fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c | 1 +
fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c | 4 ++++
include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h | 3 +++
3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
index 1aeb837..63c071f 100644
--- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
+++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_fsnotify.c
@@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ static void inotify_free_group_priv(struct fsnotify_group *group)
idr_destroy(&group->inotify_data.idr);
if (group->inotify_data.ucounts)
dec_inotify_instances(group->inotify_data.ucounts);
+ mutex_destroy(&group->inotify_data.consumer_mutex);
}
static void inotify_free_event(struct fsnotify_event *fsn_event)
diff --git a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
index 498d609..6f5b360 100644
--- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
+++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
@@ -230,6 +230,7 @@ static ssize_t inotify_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
start = buf;
group = file->private_data;
+ mutex_lock(&group->inotify_data.consumer_mutex);
add_wait_queue(&group->notification_waitq, &wait);
while (1) {
spin_lock(&group->notification_lock);
@@ -264,6 +265,7 @@ static ssize_t inotify_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
}
remove_wait_queue(&group->notification_waitq, &wait);
+ mutex_unlock(&group->inotify_data.consumer_mutex);
if (start != buf && ret != -EFAULT)
ret = buf - start;
@@ -650,6 +652,8 @@ static struct fsnotify_group *inotify_new_group(unsigned int max_events)
group->max_events = max_events;
+ mutex_init(&group->inotify_data.consumer_mutex);
+
spin_lock_init(&group->inotify_data.idr_lock);
idr_init(&group->inotify_data.idr);
group->inotify_data.ucounts = inc_ucount(current_user_ns(),
diff --git a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
index e6e689b..e0686ed 100644
--- a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
+++ b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
@@ -172,6 +172,9 @@ struct fsnotify_group {
spinlock_t idr_lock;
struct idr idr;
struct ucounts *ucounts;
+ struct mutex consumer_mutex; /* Prevent out of order
+ * delivery of events
+ * to threaded consumers */
} inotify_data;
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_FANOTIFY
--
2.9.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH 3/5] notify: Split up some fsnotify functions
2017-03-24 21:36 [PATCH 0/5] inofify: Reduce lock contention on read() Jes Sorensen
2017-03-24 21:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] notify: Call mutex_destroy() before freeing mutex memory Jes Sorensen
2017-03-24 21:36 ` [PATCH 2/5] inotify: Use mutex to prevent threaded clients reading events out of order Jes Sorensen
@ 2017-03-24 21:36 ` Jes Sorensen
2017-03-24 21:36 ` [PATCH 4/5] inotify: switch get_one_event() to use fsnotify_list_*() helpers Jes Sorensen
2017-03-24 21:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] inotify: Avoid taking spinlock for each event processed in read() Jes Sorensen
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jes Sorensen @ 2017-03-24 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: john, rlove, eparis, josef, kernel-team, Jes Sorensen
This splits up fsnotify_remove_first_event() and fsnotify_peek_first_event()
into a helper function with a wrapper, and introduces two new versions that
takes a list instead of the group as argument.
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
---
fs/notify/notification.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h | 4 ++++
2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/notify/notification.c b/fs/notify/notification.c
index 66f85c6..7b38cf8 100644
--- a/fs/notify/notification.c
+++ b/fs/notify/notification.c
@@ -144,26 +144,43 @@ int fsnotify_add_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
* Remove and return the first event from the notification list. It is the
* responsibility of the caller to destroy the obtained event
*/
-struct fsnotify_event *fsnotify_remove_first_event(struct fsnotify_group *group)
+struct fsnotify_event *
+__fsnotify_remove_first_event(struct list_head *notification_list)
{
struct fsnotify_event *event;
- assert_spin_locked(&group->notification_lock);
-
- pr_debug("%s: group=%p\n", __func__, group);
-
- event = list_first_entry(&group->notification_list,
+ event = list_first_entry(notification_list,
struct fsnotify_event, list);
/*
* We need to init list head for the case of overflow event so that
* check in fsnotify_add_event() works
*/
list_del_init(&event->list);
- group->q_len--;
return event;
}
+struct fsnotify_event *fsnotify_remove_first_event(struct fsnotify_group *group)
+{
+ struct list_head *notification_list = &group->notification_list;
+
+ assert_spin_locked(&group->notification_lock);
+
+ pr_debug("%s: group=%p\n", __func__, group);
+
+ group->q_len--;
+ return __fsnotify_remove_first_event(notification_list);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Note this version doesn't update the queue depth counter.
+ */
+struct fsnotify_event *
+fsnotify_list_remove_first_event(struct list_head *notification_list)
+{
+ return __fsnotify_remove_first_event(notification_list);
+}
+
/*
* This will not remove the event, that must be done with
* fsnotify_remove_first_event()
@@ -176,6 +193,13 @@ struct fsnotify_event *fsnotify_peek_first_event(struct fsnotify_group *group)
struct fsnotify_event, list);
}
+struct fsnotify_event *
+fsnotify_list_peek_first_event(struct list_head *notification_list)
+{
+ return list_first_entry(notification_list,
+ struct fsnotify_event, list);
+}
+
/*
* Called when a group is being torn down to clean up any outstanding
* event notifications.
diff --git a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
index e0686ed..80d4c3b 100644
--- a/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
+++ b/include/linux/fsnotify_backend.h
@@ -313,8 +313,12 @@ extern int fsnotify_add_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
extern bool fsnotify_notify_queue_is_empty(struct fsnotify_group *group);
/* return, but do not dequeue the first event on the notification queue */
extern struct fsnotify_event *fsnotify_peek_first_event(struct fsnotify_group *group);
+/* return, but do not dequeue the first event on the notification list */
+extern struct fsnotify_event *fsnotify_list_peek_first_event(struct list_head *notification_list);
/* return AND dequeue the first event on the notification queue */
extern struct fsnotify_event *fsnotify_remove_first_event(struct fsnotify_group *group);
+/* return AND dequeue the first event on the notification list */
+extern struct fsnotify_event *fsnotify_list_remove_first_event(struct list_head *notification_list);
/* functions used to manipulate the marks attached to inodes */
--
2.9.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH 4/5] inotify: switch get_one_event() to use fsnotify_list_*() helpers
2017-03-24 21:36 [PATCH 0/5] inofify: Reduce lock contention on read() Jes Sorensen
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2017-03-24 21:36 ` [PATCH 3/5] notify: Split up some fsnotify functions Jes Sorensen
@ 2017-03-24 21:36 ` Jes Sorensen
2017-03-24 21:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] inotify: Avoid taking spinlock for each event processed in read() Jes Sorensen
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jes Sorensen @ 2017-03-24 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: john, rlove, eparis, josef, kernel-team, Jes Sorensen
Preparing to switch inotify to code not taking the spinlock for each
event in read()
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
---
fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
index 6f5b360..4a93750 100644
--- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
+++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
@@ -138,18 +138,18 @@ static int round_event_name_len(struct fsnotify_event *fsn_event)
*
* Called with the group->notification_lock held.
*/
-static struct fsnotify_event *get_one_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
+static struct fsnotify_event *get_one_event(struct list_head *notification_list,
size_t count)
{
size_t event_size = sizeof(struct inotify_event);
struct fsnotify_event *event;
- if (fsnotify_notify_queue_is_empty(group))
+ if (list_empty(notification_list))
return NULL;
- event = fsnotify_peek_first_event(group);
+ event = fsnotify_list_peek_first_event(notification_list);
- pr_debug("%s: group=%p event=%p\n", __func__, group, event);
+ pr_debug("%s: event=%p\n", __func__, event);
event_size += round_event_name_len(event);
if (event_size > count)
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static struct fsnotify_event *get_one_event(struct fsnotify_group *group,
/* held the notification_lock the whole time, so this is the
* same event we peeked above */
- fsnotify_remove_first_event(group);
+ fsnotify_list_remove_first_event(notification_list);
return event;
}
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static ssize_t inotify_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
add_wait_queue(&group->notification_waitq, &wait);
while (1) {
spin_lock(&group->notification_lock);
- kevent = get_one_event(group, count);
+ kevent = get_one_event(&group->notification_list, count);
spin_unlock(&group->notification_lock);
pr_debug("%s: group=%p kevent=%p\n", __func__, group, kevent);
--
2.9.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* [PATCH 5/5] inotify: Avoid taking spinlock for each event processed in read()
2017-03-24 21:36 [PATCH 0/5] inofify: Reduce lock contention on read() Jes Sorensen
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2017-03-24 21:36 ` [PATCH 4/5] inotify: switch get_one_event() to use fsnotify_list_*() helpers Jes Sorensen
@ 2017-03-24 21:36 ` Jes Sorensen
4 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Jes Sorensen @ 2017-03-24 21:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel; +Cc: john, rlove, eparis, josef, kernel-team, Jes Sorensen
Splice off the notification list while processing read events, which allows
it to be processed without taking and releasing the spinlock for each
event.
Signed-off-by: Jes Sorensen <jsorensen@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
---
fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
index 4a93750..45b1f69 100644
--- a/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
+++ b/fs/notify/inotify/inotify_user.c
@@ -224,22 +224,27 @@ static ssize_t inotify_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
struct fsnotify_group *group;
struct fsnotify_event *kevent;
char __user *start;
- int ret;
+ int ret, consumed = 0;
DEFINE_WAIT_FUNC(wait, woken_wake_function);
+ LIST_HEAD(tmp_list);
start = buf;
group = file->private_data;
mutex_lock(&group->inotify_data.consumer_mutex);
add_wait_queue(&group->notification_waitq, &wait);
+
+ spin_lock(&group->notification_lock);
+ list_splice_init(&group->notification_list, &tmp_list);
+ spin_unlock(&group->notification_lock);
+
while (1) {
- spin_lock(&group->notification_lock);
- kevent = get_one_event(&group->notification_list, count);
- spin_unlock(&group->notification_lock);
+ kevent = get_one_event(&tmp_list, count);
pr_debug("%s: group=%p kevent=%p\n", __func__, group, kevent);
if (kevent) {
+ consumed++;
ret = PTR_ERR(kevent);
if (IS_ERR(kevent))
break;
@@ -262,8 +267,23 @@ static ssize_t inotify_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
if (start != buf)
break;
+ spin_lock(&group->notification_lock);
+ list_splice_init(&tmp_list, &group->notification_list);
+ group->q_len -= consumed;
+ consumed = 0;
+ spin_unlock(&group->notification_lock);
+
wait_woken(&wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE, MAX_SCHEDULE_TIMEOUT);
+
+ spin_lock(&group->notification_lock);
+ list_splice_init(&group->notification_list, &tmp_list);
+ spin_unlock(&group->notification_lock);
}
+ spin_lock(&group->notification_lock);
+ list_splice(&tmp_list, &group->notification_list);
+ group->q_len -= consumed;
+ spin_unlock(&group->notification_lock);
+
remove_wait_queue(&group->notification_waitq, &wait);
mutex_unlock(&group->inotify_data.consumer_mutex);
--
2.9.3
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread