From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched: Enabled schedstat when schedstat tracepoints are enabled
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2017 10:12:03 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170413101203.72e7fd5f@gandalf.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170413100118.rggxbhlgluynysmp@suse.de>
On Thu, 13 Apr 2017 11:01:19 +0100
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 12, 2017 at 10:56:07PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > From: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
> >
> > During my tests, I see this in my dmesg:
> >
> > "Scheduler tracepoints stat_sleep, stat_iowait, stat_blocked and
> > stat_runtime require the kernel parameter schedstats=enabled or
> > kernel.sched_schedstats=1"
> >
> > And found the commit:
> >
> > cb2517653fc ("sched/debug: Make schedstats a runtime tunable that is
> > disabled by default")
> >
> > Which states:
> >
> > "For tracepoints, there is a simple warning as it's not safe to activate
> > schedstats in the context when it's known the tracepoint may be wanted
> > but is unavailable."
> >
> > I'm assuming that Mel did not know about the TRACE_EVENT_FN() and
> > DEFINE_EVENT_FN() that allow for callbacks for tracepoints as they are
> > enabled and disabled. I do not see any reason for not enabling
> > schedstat when one of its tracepoints are enabled.
> >
> > The state of schedstat is saved when the first tracepoint is enabled,
> > and that state is put back when the tracepoints are disabled.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
>
> You're right, I wasn't aware. Patch looks ok. When it triggers, there
> will be a short interval of garbage numbers but that's the same as what
> happens currently. It's not deliberate action any more that would flag
> to the user that there is a hazard but I think it'll be manageable.
I wonder if there's a way to figure out when the measurements are no
longer garbage, and have a tracepoint or something to notify the user
applications that they are good to go? Or perhaps even suppress the
tracepoints (TRACE_EVENT_FN_COND) until they are stable.
>
> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Thanks!
-- Steve
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-13 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-04-12 20:04 [PATCH] " Steven Rostedt
2017-04-13 2:02 ` kbuild test robot
2017-04-13 9:00 ` [PATCH v2] " Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-13 9:01 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-04-13 14:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-04-13 10:01 ` Mel Gorman
2017-04-13 14:12 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2017-04-13 11:05 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2017-04-13 14:14 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170413101203.72e7fd5f@gandalf.local.home \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®