mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>,
	"Paul E.McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/9] debugfs: per-file removal protection
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2017 11:51:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170416095137.2784-1-nicstange@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <871stdyg0u.fsf@gmail.com>

Hello Greg,

this series implements the debugfs removal protection at file granularity,
meant to solve the livelock issue reported by Johannes [1]:

  Task 1               Task 2
  mutex_lock(&m);
                       debugfs_use_file_start(&d2, ...);
  debugfs_remove(d1);  mutex_lock(&m);

with d1 != d2.

In order to be able to store the additionally required per-dentry state,
a small container struct, debugfs_fsdata, will be allocated and installed
at ->d_fsdata.

The remaining question is if and how these debugfs_fsdata instances should
be freed. For one possible solution, please see
[9/9] ("debugfs: free debugfs_fsdata instances"). As stated in that patch's
description, I'm not convinced that it's a particularly good one -- it's
included only to show how a lock-free/RCU based scheme would look like.
In order to avoid frequent allocations and deallocations, I'd personally
not free the debugfs_fsdata instances at all: there would be exactly one
per debugfs file ever opened, which probably isn't too much. If you don't
agree, I can try and see how a simpler solution based on a global spinlock
would look like... Any advice on how to proceed with this welcome!


Thanks,

Nicolai

[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1490280886.2766.4.camel@sipsolutions.net


Nicolai Stange (9):
  debugfs: add support for more elaborate ->d_fsdata
  debugfs: implement per-file removal protection
  debugfs: debugfs_real_fops(): drop __must_hold sparse annotation
  debugfs: convert to debugfs_file_get() and -put()
  IB/hfi1: convert to debugfs_file_get() and -put()
  debugfs: purge obsolete SRCU based removal protection
  debugfs: call debugfs_real_fops() only after debugfs_file_get()
  debugfs: defer debugfs_fsdata allocation to first usage
  debugfs: free debugfs_fsdata instances

 drivers/infiniband/hw/hfi1/debugfs.c |  20 +--
 fs/debugfs/file.c                    | 272 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 fs/debugfs/inode.c                   |  55 +++++--
 fs/debugfs/internal.h                |  15 ++
 include/linux/debugfs.h              |  33 +----
 lib/Kconfig.debug                    |   1 -
 6 files changed, 256 insertions(+), 140 deletions(-)

-- 
2.12.2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-04-16  9:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-23 14:54 deadlock in synchronize_srcu() in debugfs? Johannes Berg
2017-03-23 15:29 ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-24  8:56   ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-24  9:24     ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-24 17:45       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-24 18:51         ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-24 19:33           ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-24 20:20             ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-27 11:18               ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-23 15:36 ` Nicolai Stange
2017-03-23 15:47   ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-27 11:36   ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-30  7:32     ` Nicolai Stange
2017-03-30  7:55       ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-30 10:27         ` Nicolai Stange
2017-03-30 11:11           ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-31  9:03             ` Nicolai Stange
2017-03-31  9:44               ` Johannes Berg
2017-04-16  9:51               ` Nicolai Stange [this message]
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] debugfs: add support for more elaborate ->d_fsdata Nicolai Stange
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] debugfs: implement per-file removal protection Nicolai Stange
2017-04-18  2:23                   ` [lkp-robot] [debugfs] f3e7155d08: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel kernel test robot
2017-04-23 18:37                     ` Nicolai Stange
2017-04-24  6:36                       ` Ye Xiaolong
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] debugfs: debugfs_real_fops(): drop __must_hold sparse annotation Nicolai Stange
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] debugfs: convert to debugfs_file_get() and -put() Nicolai Stange
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] IB/hfi1: " Nicolai Stange
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] debugfs: purge obsolete SRCU based removal protection Nicolai Stange
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] debugfs: call debugfs_real_fops() only after debugfs_file_get() Nicolai Stange
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] debugfs: defer debugfs_fsdata allocation to first usage Nicolai Stange
2017-04-18  9:36                   ` Johannes Berg
2017-05-02 20:05                     ` Nicolai Stange
2017-05-03  5:43                       ` Johannes Berg
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] debugfs: free debugfs_fsdata instances Nicolai Stange
2017-04-17 16:01                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-18  9:39                     ` Johannes Berg
2017-04-18 13:31                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-18 13:40                         ` Johannes Berg
2017-04-18 15:17                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-18 15:20                             ` Johannes Berg
2017-04-18 17:19                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-23 15:37 ` deadlock in synchronize_srcu() in debugfs? Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-23 15:46   ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170416095137.2784-1-nicstange@gmail.com \
    --to=nicstange@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome