mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>
To: Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Cc: Nicolai Stange <nicstange@gmail.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Paul E.McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 8/9] debugfs: defer debugfs_fsdata allocation to first usage
Date: Tue, 02 May 2017 22:05:56 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y3ufvxaz.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1492508204.2472.7.camel@sipsolutions.net> (Johannes Berg's message of "Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:36:44 +0200")

On Tue, Apr 18 2017, Johannes Berg wrote:

> On Sun, 2017-04-16 at 11:51 +0200, Nicolai Stange wrote:
>> 
>> +++ b/fs/debugfs/file.c
>> @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ const struct file_operations
>> *debugfs_real_fops(const struct file *filp)
>>  {
>>  	struct debugfs_fsdata *fsd = F_DENTRY(filp)->d_fsdata;
>>  
>> +	WARN_ON((unsigned long)fsd &
>> DEBUGFS_FSDATA_IS_REAL_FOPS_BIT);
>>  	return fsd->real_fops;
>
> I'm not a fan of BUG_ON(), but in this case, if you have a completely
> bogus pointer here, and then you return fsd->real_fops which will be
> even more bogus, and *then* you call a function from within it... that
> seems like a recipe for disaster.

Hmm. Note that debugfs_real_fops() is provided for users outside of the
debugfs core which encapsulate their file_operations in a larger struct
and access this one through a container_of(debugfs_real_fops(dentry), ...).
Now, what the above WARN_ON() really checks for is whether the
debugfs_real_fops() has been called under a debugfs_file_get()/-_put()
pair. The point of requiring this isn't protection ([1]) or anything, but
merely to be able to streamline the implementation of
debugfs_real_fops(): knowing that a debugfs_file_get() is active allows
for the omission of the WARNed_ON case, namely that the fops are
encoded in ->d_fsdata itself.


> So either you could return some valid ops (perhaps
> debugfs_noop_file_operations although those don't have .name or .poll,
> so it doesn't cover everything), or you can just BUG_ON() here
> directly, saving the incomprehensible crash later.

The purpose of that WARN_ON() there was to turn a potentially
incomprehensible crash into a comprehensible one ;)

In order to avoid a new BUG_ON(), what about keeping the WARN_ON() as is
and returning NULL instead of the garbage? That would crash current on
first access and the earlier warning would hopefully give some clue?

Thanks,

Nicolai


[1] "protection" in the sense of "protection against file removal".  With
    the proposed [9/9] ("debugfs: free debugfs_fsdata instances"), the
    patch introducing occasional freeing of ->d_fsdata, an additional
    RCU read side section would be needed if debugfs_real_fops() were
    allowed to be called outside of a debugfs_file_get()/-_put() pair.


>>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_real_fops);
>> @@ -74,9 +75,35 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_real_fops);
>>   */
>>  int debugfs_file_get(struct dentry *dentry)
>>  {
>> -	struct debugfs_fsdata *fsd = dentry->d_fsdata;
>> +	struct debugfs_fsdata *fsd;
>> +	void *d_fsd;
>> +
>> +	d_fsd = READ_ONCE(dentry->d_fsdata);
>> +	if (!((unsigned long)d_fsd &
>> DEBUGFS_FSDATA_IS_REAL_FOPS_BIT)) {
>> +		fsd = d_fsd;
>> +	} else {
>> +		fsd = kmalloc(sizeof(*fsd), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		if (!fsd)
>> +			return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +		fsd->real_fops = (void *)((unsigned long)d_fsd &
>> +					~DEBUGFS_FSDATA_IS_REAL_FOPS
>> _BIT);
>> +		refcount_set(&fsd->active_users, 1);
>> +		init_completion(&fsd->active_users_drained);
>> +		if (cmpxchg(&dentry->d_fsdata, d_fsd, fsd) != d_fsd)
>> {
>> +			kfree(fsd);
>> +			fsd = READ_ONCE(dentry->d_fsdata);
>> +		}
>> +	}
>>  
>> -	/* Avoid starvation of removers. */
>> +	/*
>> +	 * In case of a successful cmpxchg() above, this check is
>> +	 * strictly necessary and must follow it, see the comment in
>> +	 * __debugfs_remove_file().
>> +	 * OTOH, if the cmpxchg() hasn't been executed or wasn't
>> +	 * successful, this serves the purpose of not starving
>> +	 * removers.
>> +	 */
>>  	if (d_unlinked(dentry))
>>  		return -EIO;
>>  
>> @@ -98,7 +125,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_file_get);
>>   */
>>  void debugfs_file_put(struct dentry *dentry)
>>  {
>> -	struct debugfs_fsdata *fsd = dentry->d_fsdata;
>> +	struct debugfs_fsdata *fsd = READ_ONCE(dentry->d_fsdata);
>>  
>>  	if (refcount_dec_and_test(&fsd->active_users))
>>  		complete(&fsd->active_users_drained);
>> @@ -109,10 +136,11 @@ static int open_proxy_open(struct inode *inode,
>> struct file *filp)
>>  {
>>  	struct dentry *dentry = F_DENTRY(filp);
>>  	const struct file_operations *real_fops = NULL;
>> -	int r = 0;
>> +	int r;
>>  
>> -	if (debugfs_file_get(dentry))
>> -		return -ENOENT;
>> +	r = debugfs_file_get(dentry);
>> +	if (r)
>> +		return r == -EIO ? -ENOENT : r;
>>  
>>  	real_fops = debugfs_real_fops(filp);
>>  	real_fops = fops_get(real_fops);
>> @@ -233,10 +261,11 @@ static int full_proxy_open(struct inode *inode,
>> struct file *filp)
>>  	struct dentry *dentry = F_DENTRY(filp);
>>  	const struct file_operations *real_fops = NULL;
>>  	struct file_operations *proxy_fops = NULL;
>> -	int r = 0;
>> +	int r;
>>  
>> -	if (debugfs_file_get(dentry))
>> -		return -ENOENT;
>> +	r = debugfs_file_get(dentry);
>> +	if (r)
>> +		return r == -EIO ? -ENOENT : r;
>>  
>>  	real_fops = debugfs_real_fops(filp);
>>  	real_fops = fops_get(real_fops);
>> diff --git a/fs/debugfs/inode.c b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
>> index 5550f11d60bd..2360c17ec00a 100644
>> --- a/fs/debugfs/inode.c
>> +++ b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
>> @@ -184,7 +184,10 @@ static const struct super_operations
>> debugfs_super_operations = {
>>  
>>  static void debugfs_release_dentry(struct dentry *dentry)
>>  {
>> -	kfree(dentry->d_fsdata);
>> +	void *fsd = dentry->d_fsdata;
>> +
>> +	if (!((unsigned long)fsd & DEBUGFS_FSDATA_IS_REAL_FOPS_BIT))
>> +		kfree(dentry->d_fsdata);
>>  }
>>  
>>  static struct vfsmount *debugfs_automount(struct path *path)
>> @@ -346,35 +349,25 @@ static struct dentry
>> *__debugfs_create_file(const char *name, umode_t mode,
>>  {
>>  	struct dentry *dentry;
>>  	struct inode *inode;
>> -	struct debugfs_fsdata *fsd;
>> -
>> -	fsd = kmalloc(sizeof(*fsd), GFP_KERNEL);
>> -	if (!fsd)
>> -		return NULL;
>>  
>>  	if (!(mode & S_IFMT))
>>  		mode |= S_IFREG;
>>  	BUG_ON(!S_ISREG(mode));
>>  	dentry = start_creating(name, parent);
>>  
>> -	if (IS_ERR(dentry)) {
>> -		kfree(fsd);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(dentry))
>>  		return NULL;
>> -	}
>>  
>>  	inode = debugfs_get_inode(dentry->d_sb);
>> -	if (unlikely(!inode)) {
>> -		kfree(fsd);
>> +	if (unlikely(!inode))
>>  		return failed_creating(dentry);
>> -	}
>>  
>>  	inode->i_mode = mode;
>>  	inode->i_private = data;
>>  
>>  	inode->i_fop = proxy_fops;
>> -	fsd->real_fops = real_fops;
>> -	refcount_set(&fsd->active_users, 1);
>> -	dentry->d_fsdata = fsd;
>> +	dentry->d_fsdata = (void *)((unsigned long)real_fops |
>> +				DEBUGFS_FSDATA_IS_REAL_FOPS_BIT);
>>  
>>  	d_instantiate(dentry, inode);
>>  	fsnotify_create(d_inode(dentry->d_parent), dentry);
>> @@ -637,8 +630,17 @@ static void __debugfs_remove_file(struct dentry
>> *dentry, struct dentry *parent)
>>  
>>  	simple_unlink(d_inode(parent), dentry);
>>  	d_delete(dentry);
>> -	fsd = dentry->d_fsdata;
>> -	init_completion(&fsd->active_users_drained);
>> +
>> +	/*
>> +	 * Paired with the closing smp_mb() implied by a successful
>> +	 * cmpxchg() in debugfs_file_get(): either
>> +	 * debugfs_file_get() must see a dead dentry or we must see
>> a
>> +	 * debugfs_fsdata instance at ->d_fsdata here (or both).
>> +	 */
>> +	smp_mb();
>> +	fsd = READ_ONCE(dentry->d_fsdata);
>> +	if ((unsigned long)fsd & DEBUGFS_FSDATA_IS_REAL_FOPS_BIT)
>> +		return;
>>  	if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&fsd->active_users))
>>  		wait_for_completion(&fsd->active_users_drained);
>>  }
>> diff --git a/fs/debugfs/internal.h b/fs/debugfs/internal.h
>> index 0eea99432840..cb1e8139c398 100644
>> --- a/fs/debugfs/internal.h
>> +++ b/fs/debugfs/internal.h
>> @@ -25,4 +25,12 @@ struct debugfs_fsdata {
>>  	struct completion active_users_drained;
>>  };
>>  
>> +/*
>> + * A dentry's ->d_fsdata either points to the real fops or to a
>> + * dynamically allocated debugfs_fsdata instance.
>> + * In order to distinguish between these two cases, a real fops
>> + * pointer gets its lowest bit set.
>> + */
>> +#define DEBUGFS_FSDATA_IS_REAL_FOPS_BIT BIT(0)
>> +
>>  #endif /* _DEBUGFS_INTERNAL_H_ */

  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-02 20:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-03-23 14:54 deadlock in synchronize_srcu() in debugfs? Johannes Berg
2017-03-23 15:29 ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-24  8:56   ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-24  9:24     ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-24 17:45       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-24 18:51         ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-24 19:33           ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-24 20:20             ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-27 11:18               ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-23 15:36 ` Nicolai Stange
2017-03-23 15:47   ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-27 11:36   ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-30  7:32     ` Nicolai Stange
2017-03-30  7:55       ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-30 10:27         ` Nicolai Stange
2017-03-30 11:11           ` Johannes Berg
2017-03-31  9:03             ` Nicolai Stange
2017-03-31  9:44               ` Johannes Berg
2017-04-16  9:51               ` [RFC PATCH 0/9] debugfs: per-file removal protection Nicolai Stange
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 1/9] debugfs: add support for more elaborate ->d_fsdata Nicolai Stange
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 2/9] debugfs: implement per-file removal protection Nicolai Stange
2017-04-18  2:23                   ` [lkp-robot] [debugfs] f3e7155d08: BUG:unable_to_handle_kernel kernel test robot
2017-04-23 18:37                     ` Nicolai Stange
2017-04-24  6:36                       ` Ye Xiaolong
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 3/9] debugfs: debugfs_real_fops(): drop __must_hold sparse annotation Nicolai Stange
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 4/9] debugfs: convert to debugfs_file_get() and -put() Nicolai Stange
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 5/9] IB/hfi1: " Nicolai Stange
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 6/9] debugfs: purge obsolete SRCU based removal protection Nicolai Stange
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 7/9] debugfs: call debugfs_real_fops() only after debugfs_file_get() Nicolai Stange
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 8/9] debugfs: defer debugfs_fsdata allocation to first usage Nicolai Stange
2017-04-18  9:36                   ` Johannes Berg
2017-05-02 20:05                     ` Nicolai Stange [this message]
2017-05-03  5:43                       ` Johannes Berg
2017-04-16  9:51                 ` [RFC PATCH 9/9] debugfs: free debugfs_fsdata instances Nicolai Stange
2017-04-17 16:01                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-18  9:39                     ` Johannes Berg
2017-04-18 13:31                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-18 13:40                         ` Johannes Berg
2017-04-18 15:17                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-04-18 15:20                             ` Johannes Berg
2017-04-18 17:19                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-23 15:37 ` deadlock in synchronize_srcu() in debugfs? Paul E. McKenney
2017-03-23 15:46   ` Johannes Berg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87y3ufvxaz.fsf@gmail.com \
    --to=nicstange@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome